Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Welcome back to
the Wednesday in the Word
podcast.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
Serious Bible Study Applied to
Real Life.
This is the podcast where we
explain not only what Scripture
means, but how we know.
We are studying 1 Corinthians
12, verses 14 through 31 today.
This is the 38th talk in the
series on 1 Corinthians.
Lecture notes for today's talk
are on the link below the
podcast, and you can find them
on the website at
wednesdayintheword.com slash 1
Corinthians 3.8.
Glad to have you along.
We're finishing chapter 12
today of 1 Corinthians, and in
chapters 12 through 14, Paul is
addressing a problem in the
church in Corinth involving
manifestations of the Spirit or
the way we see the Spirit at
work.
We are in the now concerning
section of the letter where Paul
is addressing specific
questions that the Corinthians
have asked him, and each time he
starts a new question, he says
now concerning and then the new
topic.
With chapter 11, Paul began
answering questions related to
how they're handling themselves
in their church gatherings, and
then in 12.1 he started
addressing the problem of
tongues.
Some of the folks in the
Corinthian church believe that
speaking in tongues marks a
person as truly spiritual.
So the Corinthians think, well,
if you have this obviously
visible physical manifestation
of the spirit, like speaking in
tongues, then that is the mark
of spiritual maturity because
the Spirit of God has so
obviously overtaken you.
And Paul is speaking to the
situation where a group of
believers are grading and
judging each other based on
whether or not they speak in
tongues.
So those who speak in tongues
see themselves as spiritually
superior and they're looking
down on and rejecting those who
don't speak in tongues.
So far Paul has made two points
in this argument.
First, while the Corinthians
believe that tongues is the true
mark of spirituality, Paul has
said no, the true mark of people
who have been influenced by the
Holy Spirit is that those
people say and mean Jesus is
Lord.
If you want to see evidence
that the Spirit is at work in
someone, that's what you look
for.
Can they say and mean in a
profound way that Jesus is Lord?
Second, while the Corinthians
believe that everyone ought to
have the same gifts from the
Spirit, Paul says no, there is
both unity and diversity in the
body of Christ, and he
highlighted under that second
point two ways the Spirit works,
and it's important for us to
see the difference.
One is how the Spirit works the
same in all of us, and the
other is how the Spirit works
differently in each of us.
So on the one hand, the Spirit
gives us all the same saving
faith, the same spiritual
awakening, the same perseverance
in the faith, and the same
desire to follow Jesus.
We are all saved by the same
Lord and we have the same
Spirit.
On the other hand, the Spirit
gives us very different roles to
play in the body of Christ.
Each of us have different
functions, like different parts
of the body have different jobs
to fulfill to keep the body
healthy, so each believer has a
different job to fulfill in the
history of God's people to bring
about God's purposes and his
glory.
The section we're looking at
today is part of that second
point.
And to make this point, Paul
compares the people of Christ to
a human body, and we're going
to finish up his analogy today.
I want to back up to twelve
twelve because that's where he
starts his analogy and review a
little bit what we talked about
last time.
This is first Corinthians
twelve twelve through fourteen.
For even as the body is one and
yet has many members, and all
the members of the body, though
they are many, are one body, so
also is Christ.
For by one spirit we were all
baptized into one body, whether
Jews or Greeks, whether slaves
are free, and we were all made
to drink of one spirit.
For the body is not one member,
but many.
So let me remind you what we
talked about last time in the
last podcast.
Paul is making an analogy.
He's saying just as the body is
this way, so also are the
people of Christ.
Just as the human body is made
up of lots of different parts
and pieces, so is the Church of
Christ.
My body is a unified whole made
up of many different parts, and
each of those parts has a
different function.
My eye plays one role, my
finger plays a different role,
my heart plays a role, but
together it is all me.
My body is one unified entity
made up of lots of different
organs and joints and muscles
and things that play different
roles.
So there is a variety of
members of my body, but together
it's me.
So in the human body we see
this picture of unity in
diversity.
I am one unified body made up
of all kinds of different parts
that do all kinds of different
things, and by God's design, the
human body is meant to be a
coherent whole made up of these
parts, and Paul is saying so it
is with the Church of Christ.
Now why does Paul pick this
analogy?
Why does he think this is a
good analogy to make his point?
I think the reason is that both
the body and the church are
designed by God, and both of
them have been designed with a
similar principle in mind.
There's a logic to the way the
human body functions that is
applicable to the body of
Christ.
The human body is not a one
cell physical organism.
It's not made up of just one
kind of physical thing that does
everything.
It is a collection of parts.
Our body works and functions
well because we're made up of
these variety of parts with a
variety of functions.
If one part stops functioning,
the whole organism becomes sick.
And when all the parts are
functioning properly, we're
healthy and we can do amazing
things.
And Paul says that analogy
holds for the church.
As a church, as the people of
Christ, we are one people
together.
We're a collection of
individual parts and pieces, if
you will.
So just like the body has a
hand and an eye and a foot, we
have a variety of individuals
who play different parts in the
body of Christ.
Ultimately, the point he's
making is that it makes no sense
to think there's something
wrong if the Spirit does one
thing in one believer and a
different thing in a different
believer.
That makes no sense because of
this principle of being a
unified whole made up of a
variety of parts.
God designed the church to be a
unified group of people with a
variety of things to do.
We've been designed to be
multifaceted, a
multi-functioning group of
people, and so we should expect
to see the Spirit working
differently in different people.
That's the main point he's
making in the section, but he
makes a couple of interesting
sub points along the way.
The first one is in verses
twelve fifteen through twelve
seventeen, and in this section
he's talking about how each part
views itself.
So this is first Corinthians
twelve fifteen through
seventeen.
If the foot says, Because I am
not a hand, I am not a part of
the body, it is not for this
reason any less a part of the
body.
And if the ear says, Because I
am not an eye, I am not a part
of the body, it is not for this
reason any less a part of the
body.
If the whole body were an eye,
where would hearing be?
If the whole were hearing,
where would the sense of smell
be?
Now Paul's making this analogy
by personifying the body parts
the eye, the ear, the hand, they
don't speak or have minds of
their own.
This is a literary device.
And he wants the Corinthians to
change how they're thinking
about themselves.
They're saying things like,
Well, gosh, I don't speak in
tongues, so I must be a second
class Christian.
Maybe I'm not even a believer.
And Paul's point is that's like
the eye saying I'm not really
part of the body.
He wants them to say, Well,
that's silly, of course my eye
is part of the body, it's part
of me.
It's me, it's my own body.
And he wants them to begin to
view the church as they view
their own bodies.
I don't accuse my hand of being
useless because it can't see,
so why do I think I'm worthless
because I don't speak in
tongues?
So in this part of the analogy,
his sub point is how each part
of the body views itself.
And that makes sense because if
there's a group saying, Well,
you know, you're not really a
believer if you don't speak in
tongues, then there probably is
another group who's saying,
Gosh, I don't speak in tongues,
I am really worried.
And they're wondering if they
really belong in the church at
all, and maybe there's something
wrong with them.
So Paul starts with that fear.
He says, think about the human
body.
If the whole body were an eye,
all you could do is see.
You couldn't hear, you couldn't
smell, you could see a flower,
but you couldn't walk over and
pick it up and smell it.
In fact, you couldn't do much
of anything at all.
You can accomplish what you
accomplish precisely because the
parts of the body are
different.
The human body depends on
diversity and depends on each
part of the body doing their
different things.
He goes on then in twelve,
eighteen through twenty, but now
God has placed the members,
each one of them in the body
just as he desired.
If they were all one member,
where would the body be?
But now there are many members,
but one body.
So again he's emphasizing the
body is a collection of parts
that God purposely placed.
God purposely gathered all
those parts into one person, and
this is also how he makes his
church.
He gathers together a diverse
group of individuals and makes
them one people or one tribe.
If there were only one body
part, there wouldn't be a body,
it couldn't function the way God
intends the body to function.
And God designed his church the
same way.
In the church we are one people
who all follow the same Lord,
but we serve Him in a wide
variety of ways.
And God has taken each of us
and put us into this people who
belong to Christ by design, and
he gives each of us a different
role to play in that body, a
different way to function, just
like the different organs do
different things in the human
body, or the way different
instruments in an orchestra play
different parts, but they're
all playing the same piece of
music.
If everyone did the same thing,
then the church wouldn't
function the way God wants it
to.
And that plays itself on both
the local level with the local
church, but ultimately I think
Paul's talking about the
universal church across all of
history.
Now he turns to how we think
about each other.
This is twenty one through
twenty five.
And the eye cannot say to the
hand, I have no need of you, or
again the head to the feet, I
have no need of you.
On the contrary, it is much
truer that the members of the
body which seem to be weaker are
necessary, and those members of
the body which we deem less
honorable, on these we bestow
more abundant honor, and our
less presentable members become
much more presentable.
Whereas our more presentable
members have no need of it.
But God has so composed the
body, giving more abundant honor
to that member which lacked, so
that there may be no division
in the body, but the members may
have the same care for one
another.
So in this section, Paul
changes the emphasis.
Before he was looking at how
does each part of the body think
about itself.
Now he's talking about how does
one part think about another
part.
So before it was I'm not an I,
so I'm a lesser part of the
body, and Paul says that's a
foolish way to think because God
designed the body with many
different parts.
Now the issue is, well, you're
not an I, so you don't belong.
I'm the I, I'm important, but
you're not, so there's something
wrong with you.
And again, this is the attitude
we see causing strife in the
Corinthian church.
They are judging each other and
grading each other on whether
or not they've ever spoken in
tongues, and the tongue speakers
are rejecting or dismissing
everyone else.
And Paul turns to that attitude
and says, Look, if you realize
that God designed the church to
have the same kind of unity and
diversity as the human body,
then why would you say such
things?
You don't treat your body that
way.
You don't say you have no need
of your foot or your hand, so
why are you saying you have no
need of your fellow believer?
The church requires diverse
functioning parts just like the
human body.
And he makes a couple of
interesting points here.
First he has this language
about some parts may indeed be
weaker than others.
As you might expect, there's
some debate over what he means
by weaker.
There are a number of good
options, but they all basically
have the same flavor.
So the idea is something like
the weaker member works behind
the scenes as opposed to front
and center in the spotlight.
Or the weaker member has a less
visible or less obvious impact.
They don't play as public a
role.
Something along those lines.
My hands and my mouth play an
obviously visible role in what I
can do and what I can say.
How well my stomach functions
also plays a role in what I can
do and what I can say by
providing nutrients and energy
so that I can say and do those
things, but you don't really see
it.
You don't see the role it's
playing.
It's weaker and that it's not
so obvious, it's not so visible.
Or Paul could be saying, Some
parts of the human body just are
weaker, they require more
protection than others, but
they're just as important.
So I use my eyes every day.
I'm very conscious about how
important my eyes are to me.
I wear sunglasses, I protect
them from harm.
I'm less conscious of my spleen
or my kneecap.
I don't think about protecting
those as much.
So he could be making that kind
of analogy.
But again, you can see that's a
similar flavor of some parts
having a highly visible, public,
understandable role, and others
having a less tangible, less
visible, less obvious role.
However, we understand weaker.
His point is that there are
weaker parts of the body and the
weaker parts are necessary.
All the parts of my human body
have a function.
That function may not be as
obviously strongly necessary as,
say, my beating heart or my
breathing lungs, but all of them
are necessary.
They're part of me, they all
contribute.
You might not think about your
kneecap, but the minute it gets
bruised or broken, you discover
how significant it really is.
Likewise, in the body of
Christ, in the church, you may
not appreciate or understand the
role that someone else is
playing, but by God's design
it's necessary.
This is why one body part does
not reject or dismiss another
part.
And likewise in the church,
everyone has a role to play.
Everyone is necessary.
We are placed in the church
body by God's design, just as He
placed each organ and joint and
ligament and nerve in the body.
God has given each person a
role to play in the body of
Christ, and therefore each
person's role contributes in
some way.
No one can be dismissed as
unimportant or negligible.
And now when I say role, I'm
talking about more than sign up
sheets and jobs.
This is not a pitch to get out
your clipboards and have some
sign up for cleanup duties or
some people for childcare and
some people for music and some
people for snacks or whatever.
True, those are roles or jobs
we can do in the church, but I
think Paul is speaking more
generally about all the various
opportunities God gives us to
serve, including things like
being a friend, being a sister
or a brother, being a parent,
the roles we play in each
other's lives to encourage each
other, to rebuke each other, to
offer a shoulder to cry on, or
leg up when you've been knocked
down.
This could be anything from
driving someone to their cancer
treatments to teaching them a
second language, to offering a
word of encouragement on a bad
day, or giving them a lift when
their car breaks down.
It's not limited to the kinds
of professional ministerial jobs
we tend to think about, like
pastor, teacher, evangelist,
missionary.
The ways we can serve are
incredibly multifaceted.
His point, though, is that
everyone has a role to play and
contributes to the body of
Christ in some way, and we have
no cause to judge or dismiss
anyone else because we don't
like their role or we don't
understand it.
Paul has a second point in this
section.
It's not just that some members
are weaker, there's another
point he makes that's a little
more subtle and harder to
follow.
Some translations make it
easier to see than others, but I
think it's a really important
point.
In twelve twenty three he says
that those parts of the body
which we think to be less
respectable, we clothe these
parts in more abundant
respectability and our less
presentable members become more
presentable.
What's going on there?
This word respectable has the
idea of honor or dignity,
respectability, importance,
glory.
And I think his analogy is that
in the human body, some parts
play a very public role in who I
am.
My face is intended to be
public.
You see my face and you
recognize me.
You hear the sound of my voice
and you recognize it's me, or
you see the way I walk and you
recognize it's me.
These are the parts that have a
publicly visible, beautiful
face.
And he says to our
unpresentable parts we give more
presentability.
I think he's being euphemistic
there.
Essentially, I think he's
saying our indecent parts, our
private parts, the parts of our
body that we cover up and we
don't expose to the public in
the way that other parts of our
body are presentable and exposed
to the public.
You can understand what he's
saying by the contrast.
There are those parts of the
body that have a certain honor
and dignity, and we publicly
display them.
And then there are the indecent
parts that we cover up.
They don't have the same honor
and respectability, and they're
not something we show to the
world.
Now what's the analogy?
What's he saying?
I don't expose the flaws and
the indecent and the private
parts of my body, but I don't
reject them.
I honor them.
Why?
Because it's all part of me.
It may not be perfect or
presentable or honorable, but
it's still me.
It gains honor and dignity
because it's part of me.
I don't make a distinction.
What do I do about the
indecent, dishonorable parts?
I clothe them.
I clothe them with more
respectability.
I wear clothes that might
disguise the faults, or I use
makeup to cover the blemishes.
I try to make myself look as
good as I can by clothing the
indecent parts, covering the
flaws, and trying to make them
less obvious.
I adorn them to make them more
presentable.
Because I want all parts of me
to be honorable.
I don't divide myself up into
these parts that I care about
and parts that I don't care
about.
It's all me.
I care about all of me, even
the less presentable parts.
And Paul's point is we make our
less presentable parts more
presentable, whereas our
presentable parts don't have a
need of it.
I don't need to make those
parts intended for public view
more presentable because they're
already presentable.
I might brush my hair, wash my
face, but fundamentally good to
go.
If I don't have time to do
that, I'm still presentable.
But the rest of me, well, it
needs a little help before I
walk out the door.
I have to cover it or adorn it
and give it some honor to make
it presentable.
And this is how I think about
myself, and Paul's point is this
is how you should think about
the church body.
The weaker parts, the parts
that are not as public, that
aren't given as much.
Much honor.
We don't reject them, we don't
dismiss them, we should adorn
them, we should treat them with
even more care and honor than
the parts that don't need it.
I don't have to worry about my
face, but I better make sure the
rest of me is properly
presentable.
Everyone takes a certain amount
of care to make their entire
body presentable before they go
out in public, and that's Paul's
point.
You should think about everyone
in the church that way.
The parts that have less honor
that seem less public, that seem
less obvious, you should adorn
them and honor them.
Now Paul sums this up in twenty
four through twenty six, but
God has so composed the body,
giving more abundant honor to
that member which lacked, so
that there may be no division in
the body, but that the members
may have the same care for one
another, and if one member
suffers, all the members suffer
with it, if one member is
honored, all the members rejoice
with it.
Now he's getting to the heart
of the point, so that there may
be no division in the body.
God has created the various
parts of my human body and put
them together to make me.
The fact that they are separate
but put together to make me
changes the way I think about
them.
I honor them equally.
The parts of me that are not
presentable or not particularly
honorable gain honor because
they're part of me.
In my mind there's no
difference.
I don't reject or dismiss them.
So by putting them together in
one body, God has made it so all
the parts have the same dignity
and honor because they're all
one.
My body parts are not at war
with each other.
So what's the analogy to the
body of Christ?
Well, Paul is not saying that
some people in the church are
indecent and need to be hidden
away.
That would be taking his
analogy too far, and it would be
contrary to what he's just said
about how God designed and
placed each person in the body
of Christ.
He's making a point about how
we are to think about each
other, how we are to view each
other.
Some roles are more striking
and visible than others.
Some roles get the kind of
attention that the face or the
voice gets when I present myself
to the world.
Some people are more up front
and publicly visible, others
work behind the scenes or in
quiet.
Some roles we all seem to covet
because we secretly want to be
rock stars, and other roles we
don't value as perhaps we
should.
The Corinthians have made a
mistake in focusing on speaking
in tongues, and Paul's going to
argue that point strongly as we
get into chapter fourteen.
Of all the gifts of the Spirit,
tongues is on the less
significant side, and they've
elevated one of the least
significant to the top spot, and
in that they've made a mistake.
But we need to see that Paul is
not at all concerned that some
roles are more public than
others, that some roles have a
more visible, tangible impact on
others.
Some roles are done in the
spotlight of human history, and
some roles are done backstage in
the shadows, and that's okay.
And he's going to have more to
say on that in chapter 14.
He is going to argue there that
doing something that edifies
the entire church is more
significant than something that
doesn't.
Thus, doing something that
edifies the worldwide church is
more significant than something
that edifies only a few.
It has a greater impact in the
functioning of the body.
But his point is it's all one
body.
The analogy is those high
impact, glamorous roles are like
the public parts of my body.
The roles no one notices and
everyone takes for granted are
like the indecent parts.
But the point is they're all
necessary.
They are equally part of the
people of Christ, and therefore
they are clothed with the same
honor and dignity.
The importance of our role in
the grand scheme of history and
measured by certain human
standards should have nothing to
do with how we think about each
other.
The honor of the body covers
everyone in it.
I am not to judge you or
dismiss you because of the role
you play.
I'm not to give more honor to
say the apostle Paul or Mother
Teresa or Billy Graham than the
person sitting next to me in the
pew.
Paul is saying take that same
attitude toward the body of
Christ that you have toward your
own human body.
Some parts of your body are
more public, some are more
private, but you see them all as
you and you give them equal
honor, and so it should be in
the body of Christ.
You should be concerned about
everyone in it.
The Corinthians have made this
exact mistake.
Not only did they elevate
tongues and give it more
importance than the rest of the
gifts in the body, they have
used it as a measuring rod to
reject and dismiss other parts
of the body.
And Paul's saying that's a
foolish way to think.
God puts the human body
together so that there's no
division, no strife, and no part
is graded or rejected by the
role it plays or by how public
or private it is.
And that's the way the church
should be.
You should take the same care
for everyone in the church.
Measuring each other and
grading each other by what role
you play is foolish.
But that's not what we've seen
in Corinth.
Division seems to be their
middle name.
We've seen that there are
divisions in the church since
chapter one.
There we saw some rejecting
Paul as an apostle.
Later we saw some people
looking down on others who
didn't eat meat sacrificed to
idols.
We've seen divisions because
the wealthy are mistreating the
poor, and now we see divisions
because some think they have the
cool gift and other people
don't.
And Paul says think of the
church the way you think of your
own body.
To divide over these sorts of
issues, especially whether or
not you speak in tongues, makes
about as much sense as lopping
off your hand because it's not
an eye.
Whatever role that other person
is playing in the body of
Christ, it is a necessary role
to play, whether it's public or
it's private, it has local
impact or it has global impact,
or whether you understand or
value it or not.
You and that other person are
both part of the plans and
purposes of God in the same way
your organs are part of your
body.
You're in this together.
You are both part of God's plan
and God's design, and it is not
your place to judge, reject, or
dismiss each other.
It is your place to think of
each other as part of you
because you are both people whom
Christ has saved and in whom
the Spirit of God is at work.
To wrap this up then, Paul gets
very specific.
He's been implying all these
ideas through his analogy, and
now he makes it clear.
Along the way he didn't explain
it to these points, but now he
brings it home.
So this is first Corinthians
twelve twenty seven.
Now you are Christ's body and
individually members of it, and
God has appointed in the church
first apostles, second prophets,
third teachers, then miracles,
then gifts of healings, helps,
administrations, various kinds
of tongues.
All are not apostles, are they?
All are not prophets, are they?
All are not teachers, are they?
All are not workers of
miracles, are they?
All do not have the gifts of
healing, do they?
All do not speak with tongues,
do they?
All do not interpret, do they,
but earnestly desire the greater
gifts, and I show you a still
more excellent way.
First we notice that Paul lists
various roles that God has
given to various people in the
church.
These are analogous to the
parts of the human body, these
are various roles that various
people have been given to play
by the Spirit.
And Paul says, look around you,
not everyone is an apostle, not
everyone is a prophet, not
everyone is a teacher, not
everyone works a miracle.
God intends there to be
different roles.
This is the way God wants it to
be.
And you'll notice that this
list is not the same as the one
he gave earlier.
And I think the reason is
because he's not working from
some comprehensive master
catalog.
This is not an official list of
official gifts.
These are just some of the many
ways that the Spirit gives
various people to work and to
serve in the body.
I think if you were to ask
Paul, is this the list?
He'd say, look around you.
Is this the only way the Spirit
works in the world?
Is this the only way
individuals can serve the
church?
Of course not.
And the more individually we
want to look at it, the more we
could multiply the list.
For example, Peter and Paul
were both apostles, but their
apostleship looked very
different.
They both served as apostles,
but they served in very
different ways.
So how specific do you want to
get?
If we get detailed enough and
specific enough, we could
probably see that the list is as
long as the number of
individual believers.
Of course, there's some
overlap, there's some
generalization, but potentially
we could individualize the list
to the same as the number of
believers.
Notice that apostle is first on
the list and followed by
prophets.
I think this clues us in that
Paul has the universal church in
mind, not a particular local
body.
The apostles are servants to
the entire body of Christ
throughout history.
Paul's ministry continues today
because we're here studying his
letters.
Hopefully what you get from me
is what Paul thought.
You've probably heard the joke
that the greatest insult you can
give a Bible teacher is that
your work is both original and
good.
The part that's original is not
good, and the part that's good
is not original.
That's funny because we
selfishly want to be original
geniuses, but if we are original
geniuses, then we're not
explaining what the author meant
to say.
So to the extent that I tell
you something that is not what
Paul meant to say, it may be
original, but it's not good.
And to the extent that I tell
you what Paul meant to say, it's
good, but it's not original.
So to the extent that this
podcast is good, it's because
it's not original, and it's a
continuation of the ministry of
the apostle Paul as we
understand his letters, and
hopefully prayerfully that's the
case.
When Paul starts this list with
apostles and prophets, I think
that tells us he's talking about
the universal church comprised
of all believers throughout
history and not a particular
local gathering.
He says, first there are
apostles, and I don't think he
means in time, they have a
priority over the other gifts
because Jesus taught them
personally.
Jesus and the Spirit at work in
them gifted them with a clear,
accurate understanding of the
truth.
Christ came to teach that truth
and he taught it to the
apostles.
Christ laid the foundation and
the apostles are the first ones
to build on that foundation.
Everyone else comes after them.
And again, we see this idea
that some roles are more public
and visible than others.
There's no question that the
apostles have had a more
important, visible, widespread
global public impact on the
universal church than, say, me
or any local teacher.
It's not even a comparison.
Now I do realize if you took me
out of the equation, it would
make a difference.
This is part of the point that
Paul has just made about each
individual in the body being
individually placed there as
part of God's plan and purpose
and design.
But clearly, my impact is
nowhere near the historical
impact of Paul, and that is by
God's design.
So how should I think about
that?
Should I be jealous?
Should I feel like I was
gypped?
Should Paul look down on me and
judge me because I have such a
small, insignificant role to
play?
Paul say no, you should think
of that difference like you
think of your own body.
Yes, when compared to the
apostle Paul, I am the weaker,
indecent part of the body, but I
have honor nevertheless.
Paul and I are on the same
team.
We are serving the same Lord,
we are part of the same body,
though we have vastly different
roles to play.
Our honor comes from the fact
that the Spirit of God is at
work in both of us such that we
can both say Jesus is Lord.
We have different roles to play
in the universal church, and
that's by God's design.
We don't need a church full of
apostles, just like we don't
need a body full of eyes.
Now Paul's going to go on to
say zealously desire the greater
gifts, and he's going to
explain what he means by that as
we go on.
We shouldn't be afraid that
some gifts have more impact than
others.
Paul is trying to establish the
idea that our worth, our value,
our dignity as human beings,
our worth as individual members
of the body of Christ has
nothing to do with the role we
play in that body.
Our roles are different by
God's design.
Our roles have different impact
by God's design.
Some roles are weaker, less
obvious, have less public global
impact.
Some roles have more of that.
That's by God's design.
This is all part of the
Spirit's gift to us, and it has
nothing to do with our worth
because we are all part of one
body.
We are all necessary to a
healthy functioning church.
Alright, just one more thought
to wrap this up.
Diversity in the church is
God's intention.
It's not appropriate for me to
dismiss myself as unimportant
because my role looks different
than yours.
If I'm doing that, then I have
misunderstood what the body of
Christ is all about.
Likewise, it is very wrong for
me to judge, grade, or reject
others because I don't see the
value in their gift.
It is inappropriate for me to
look down on anyone else because
they don't serve the way I do.
By God's design, we all
contribute something to Christ
and his church and we all
contribute differently.
That's part of the plan.
Everyone has a different part
to play.
And Paul is quite prepared to
say that some people are given
big impact parts to play and
others aren't, but in the end we
should all see ourselves as
part of the grand design.
If you think of history as a
grand tapestry that God is
weaving, we are all threads in
the fabric.
Some colors may be more
prominent than others, and they
may stand out more, but we are
all part of the final picture
and we are all necessary, and
that's the attitude we need to
take toward each other.
But there's another very
important point here.
It is true we all contribute
something, but it is equally
true that our worth, our value,
and our dignity is not dependent
on what we contribute.
That's the point he's trying to
make.
The issue is not what role do
you have to play in the Church
of Christ and who has the best
role and who got the bigger role
and the more impact role.
The issue is are you part of
his church at all?
If you are, you have worth and
value and dignity the same as
every other member of the
church.
Paul is not more worthy as a
Christian than any of us today.
We all have the same Lord, the
same Father, the same spirit,
and the same grace.
In what truly matters, we are
equal.
This is a really hard concept
to grasp because it is directly
opposite of what our modern
world tells us.
Society teaches us that role
matters, and if you have an
impact role, then you're an
important person.
And if you don't have an impact
role, then you've just wasted
your life, you're nothing.
That is worldly thinking, and
we are all inclined to think
that way.
We are all inclined to think
that God gives us spiritual
gifts so that we can solve the
problem of our self-image and
see ourselves as important
people and feel good about
ourselves.
I don't think that's why he
gives us these roles to play,
and thinking like that sets us
up for disappointment.
Because no role, no matter what
it is, is going to fill up my
self-image.
Just ask anyone who hit the
role lottery and they'll tell
you that role didn't really
satisfy.
No role is going to solve the
problem of my worth and my
self-image in part because we
are sinners.
We will never be good enough.
No matter how exquisitely we
might execute our roles, we know
deep inside we could have done
better.
And roles that we are given to
play were not made to fill that
void.
That's why it's extremely
important that we understand
Paul's distinction between the
roles we play in the body of
Christ and the honor and the
dignity we have as human beings
saved and redeemed by Christ.
Our role is all the different
things God allows us to do and
gifts us to do and calls us to
do, but our identity, our worth
comes from being part of the
body of Christ.
And that worth is not dependent
on what role you play.
If you are part of Christ's
body, you have a dignity that is
the same as every other part of
his body.
Christ died to save Paul and to
make him part of his people,
and Christ died to save you and
me and make us part of his
people, and that gives us worth.
Now, all human beings have
worth because they're made in
the image of God, but that's not
the point Paul's making here.
He's saying, as believers, we
are people in whom the Spirit of
God is at work, maturing and
strengthening our faith.
We are the people Jesus died to
save and we are in this
together.
We are one in a way that
someone who has rejected the
claims of Jesus is not.
And just as I think of all the
parts of my body as equally
significant and part of me, so
all of us in whom God is working
this miracle of saving faith
are part of Christ's body, and
we are equally significant no
matter what roles God gives us
to play in history.
It is by God's design that we
have these various roles, and
you could argue, well, Paul got
the best one and the rest of us
got gypped, but if we argued to
God that he's not playing fair
because look at what role let's
say Martin Luther got compared
to someone like me, he would say
that's not what your roles are
intended to be.
You were not designed to find
your worth in your roles.
You were designed to find your
worth in being part of the body
of Christ.
Your roles are supposed to be
different.
You are destined for glory
because of what Christ has done
for you, and you should find
your worth in that, and then
gratefully play whatever part
God gives you to play in the
body of Christ.
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
My mission is to explain not
only what a passage means, but
how I reach those conclusions.
I don't accept any advertising
on my website, nor do I ask for
donations, but it does encourage
me to hear what you've learned.
I hope you leave a positive
comment on your favorite podcast
platform, and please share what
you've learned with a friend.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by Reggie Coates of
Heartfeltmusic.org.
I invite you to check out his
other music.
You'll be glad you did.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you next week at Wednesday
in the Word.
In the meantime, I hope you
find some time to visit my
website, wednesdayintheword.com,
and take advantage of some of
my free Bible study materials.