Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Welcome to
Wednesday in the Word.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
Today we'll be studying Matthew
chapter 3, verses 1 through 12.
This is the eighth talk in our
series on the Gospel of Matthew.
Lecture notes for today's talk,
which contain links to
everything mentioned in the
podcast and an outline of the
main point.
Those lecture notes can be
found on the link below this
podcast, or you can go to
wednesdayintheword.com slash
Matthew 8.
Thanks so much for listening
today.
Well, we're continuing our
series in the Gospel of Matthew
today, and we're starting
Matthew chapter 3, and we'll be
turning our attention to John
the Baptist.
In the first two chapters,
Matthew covered the early life
of Jesus, explaining how Jesus
came to be born in Bethlehem but
raised in Nazareth.
With chapter three, Matthew
skips ahead many years.
Jesus is now an adult and about
to begin his public ministry.
We're going to start with
Matthew chapter three verses one
through three.
In those days John the Baptist
came preaching in the wilderness
of Judea.
Repent, for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand, for this is
he who was spoken of by the
prophet Isaiah when he said, The
voice of one crying in the
wilderness, prepare the way of
the Lord, make his path
straight.
Matthew is quoting from Isaiah
forty verse three, and it seems
to be a fairly straightforward
quotation.
Isaiah forty three reads, A
voice is calling, clear the way
for the Lord in the wilderness,
make smooth in the desert a
highway for our God.
Isaiah says that someone will
come proclaiming a message that
the people should prepare for
the coming of the Lord, and John
the Baptist comes proclaiming a
message that people should
prepare for the coming of the
Lord.
There is one interpretive
question in this section, and
it's one we have to answer about
Isaiah forty.
First, just to set the stage,
Isaiah was a prophet to the
southern kingdom of Judah during
the time of the divided
kingdom.
He dates his ministry to four
kings who reigned from about
seven hundred forty BC to six
hundred eighty BC, which means
his ministry spanned about fifty
or sixty years.
The first section of the book,
chapters one through thirty
five, is set against the
background of the Assyrian
Empire.
When the Assyrians ravaged the
northern and the southern
kingdoms of Israel and Judah,
eventually taking the northern
kingdom into exile.
The last section of Isaiah,
chapters forty through
sixty-six, is the section where
we find this quote, and this
section is concerned with the
Babylonian captivity, and it's
addressed to a group of people
who lived about 120 to 140 years
after Isaiah.
So chapters 40 through 66 are
set against the Babylonian
exile.
In this section, Isaiah is
prophesying to the captives in
Babylon, but at the time he is
writing, they are not yet
captives.
So Isaiah is a unique prophet
in that he not only ministered
and prophesied to his
contemporaries, he also
prophesied to a generation who
would come after him and would
live through the Babylonian
exile.
So we find this quote in
chapter forty.
Let me read you Isaiah forty
verses three through five.
A voice is calling, clear the
way for the Lord in the
wilderness, make smooth in the
desert a highway for our God.
Let every valley be lifted up,
and every mountain and hill be
made low, and let the rough
ground become a plain, and the
rugged terrain a broad valley.
Then the glory of the Lord will
be revealed, and all flesh will
see it together, for the mouth
of the Lord has spoken.
A voice is crying in the
wilderness, prepare the way of
the Lord, make straight a desert
or a highway for our God.
And the question we have to
answer is what does the phrase
in the wilderness modify?
Is the voice crying in the
wilderness saying, prepare the
way of the Lord?
Or is the voice saying, prepare
the way of the Lord in the
wilderness?
You'll recall that a feature of
Hebrew poetry is parallelism,
where two lines of the poem work
together, and there are lots
and lots of ways for those two
lines to relate to each other,
but the most common way is for
the two lines to say the same
thing in different words.
We call this synonymous.
So the second line restates the
same idea of the first line but
in different words.
Parallelism would suggest that
the phrases are arranged like
this In the wilderness is
parallel to in the desert,
prepare is parallel to make
smooth.
The way of our Lord is parallel
to a highway for our God.
The parallelism suggests that
the wilderness is not where the
voice is crying out, the
wilderness is part of the
message that the voice is
proclaiming.
At the time it was hard to
travel through the wilderness.
When a king wanted to travel
from point A to point B, the
king's people would go before
him and they would make a road,
they would clear out the
obstacles and level it out so
that the king could then travel
easily and quickly and his path
would not be obstructed.
Kind of like today when the
president goes through town and
the police go before him and
they turn all the traffic lights
green in his direction and they
stop all the cross traffic so
that he can just travel straight
down the road.
When the king was traveling to
another country, a large crew
would go before him and prepare
the roadway.
They'd remove the obstacles,
they'd smooth the road so that
his chariot could travel
unobstructed when it came later.
That's the image here.
Isaiah is saying to Israel,
prepare the highway, prepare the
roadway to meet your God.
So Isaiah is presenting this
metaphorical picture calling for
a path to be made in the
wilderness so that the
wilderness can be transfersed
easily because the king is
coming.
And that's what he goes on to
say.
Every valley should be lifted
up, so in order to make it easy
to travel, you level the ground,
you bring the valleys up.
Likewise, every mountain or
hill made low, same idea, bring
all the high places down to
level ground so it's easy for
the king to travel.
Make all the uneven ground
level, make the road straight
and easy so that God can come
and meet his people.
The context of Isaiah forty is
this metaphorical picture of
clearing all the obstacles out
of God's way as you prepare for
his arrival.
In the earlier chapters, Isaiah
used the image of the highway
to talk about the people going
back to the land after the exile
was over.
Now in chapter forty, he's
switching the metaphor to a
highway for God to come and meet
his people.
And Matthew quotes this section
with reference to John the
Baptist, but there's a slight
variation in Matthew's
translation.
The Hebrew Bible reads a voice
cries in the wilderness, prepare
the way of the Lord.
And the question is, is the
voice crying, quote, in the
wilderness, prepare the way, so
prepare the wilderness, or is
the voice crying in the
wilderness, quote, prepare the
way of the Lord?
In the Hebrew, the wilderness
is the place where the highway
is prepared, and we saw that
with the parallelism with the
next verse, but when this was
translated into Greek in the
translation that we know of as
the Septuagint, which was a
translation made around the
third century BC, it was changed
slightly.
The Septuagint version reads In
the wilderness a voice cries,
quote, prepare the way of the
Lord.
So in the Septuagint
translation, the place where the
voice is crying is the
wilderness, not the place where
the roadway is being prepared,
and the Septuagint actually
omits that second phrase in the
desert, so they locate the voice
in the wilderness.
Now Matthew quotes the
Septuagint, which would have
been the version his audience
was familiar with.
In fact, this passage gets
quoted by all four of the gospel
writers, and all four of them
quote the Septuagint because
that was the main translation
people were using in their day.
Now critical scholars like to
claim that the gospel writers
made a mistake here, or that
they have some kind of devious
motives, that they're quoting
the Septuagint to make it sound
like Isaiah is talking about
John the Baptist, but really
Isaiah's not talking about that
at all.
Or they claim the gospel
authors are trying to stack the
deck in their favor, making it
sound like Isaiah was predicting
John the Baptist when in fact
he wasn't.
And some say the Septuagint is
a mistranslation of the original
Hebrew, and so the gospel
writers are quoting a mistake.
So basically this is one of
those places that critics of the
Bible like to point to and say,
see, it's an error.
But I don't think it's an
error.
Matthew is simply quoting a
different translation.
That does not mean that Matthew
made a mistake.
We can decide that the
translators of the Septuagint
were right, or we can decide
they were wrong, and it doesn't
change Matthew's meaning.
Someone is calling out to
prepare a way for the coming
king, and that's the role John
the Baptist played.
Matthew used the Septuagint
because it was the translation
at hand.
It was the one that his
audience is likely to know, and
there's nothing wrong with that.
I might quote the New
International Version or any
English translation of the
Bible, and there might be places
where I disagree with that
translation.
Looking at the parallelism, I
think the Hebrew text is the
more accurate understanding, and
that the Septuagint messed it
up a little, but I'm really not
an expert in the ancient
languages.
Either way you take it, though,
both Matthew and Isaiah are
making the same point.
Before the Messiah comes,
someone is going to call out,
prepare the way for the coming
king, and Matthew is telling us
that someone is John the
Baptist.
Isaiah's point is this is an
announcement of comfort.
This is an announcement that
the exile will end and that God
is coming to meet them again.
A herald is calling that a king
is coming and it's time to get
ready.
It's time to prepare to meet
him.
Isaiah's immediate prediction
concerned the end of the exile,
but John the Baptist is a
fulfillment in the fullest sense
of the word.
He is the ultimate herald who
announces the ultimate king who
is coming and it's time to get
ready to meet him.
If exiled Israel is to humble
herself to prepare to return to
God because her period of
judgment is coming to an end,
how much more important is it
that the people of John the
Baptist's time prepare to meet
the Messiah who has now come?
So the voice is a herald, the
king is coming, and his servants
are to prepare the road so that
he can come and meet his
people.
This is the herald announcing
his coming, and that's exactly
what John the Baptist did.
God is coming to save his
people, and a herald is
announcing him.
And this is very consistent in
the way Matthew has been quoting
the Old Testament up to this
point.
We have seen that most often he
uses the idea of fulfillment in
the idea of the fullest type or
the fullest picture.
And that's we've talked about
that a lot in the previous
podcast, so I'm not going to go
over all that in detail again
here.
If you missed it, go back and
listen to the last three
podcasts.
Notice that the voice in Isaiah
is vague, obscure, almost
unnoticeable.
It doesn't call attention to
itself because the message is
more important than the
messenger.
What God wants them to pay
attention to is the content of
the message, not the voice
saying it.
John the Baptist, even though
Jesus calls him the greatest
prophet ever born, is given no
title.
He's given no designation in
Isaiah because for Isaiah the
important point is what the
voice is saying, not who it is.
I think the idea is that when
the new king comes, his glory is
so great that no other name
need to be mentioned next to
his.
John the Baptist is like the
best man at a wedding.
He performs a very vital
function, he's necessary to the
ceremony, but he is not there to
call attention to himself, and
he most certainly should not go
on the honeymoon.
After summarizing John's
message, Matthew then describes
John and his popularity.
This is Matthew chapter three
verses four through six.
Now John wore a garment of
camel's hair and a leather belt
around his waist, and his food
was locusts and wild honey.
Then Jerusalem and all Judea
and all the region about the
Jordan were going out to him,
and they were baptized by him in
the Jordan River, confessing
their sins.
So from three five we learn
that John the Baptist was a very
popular figure.
The crowds accurately recognize
that he is a prophet of God.
There's been about four hundred
years of prophetic silence, and
now here is John the Baptist,
and everybody wants to know what
he says.
Later in Matthew 21, we learn
that even after John's death,
the Pharisees fear saying
anything bad about him because
they were afraid of how the
crowds might react, because he
was still that well known and
that popular.
This is Matthew 21, verses 23
through 27.
And when he entered the temple,
this is Jesus, when he entered
the temple, the chief priests
and the elders of the people
came up to him as he was
teaching and said, By what
authority are you doing these
things, and who gave you this
authority?
Jesus answered them, I also
will ask you one question, and
if you tell me the answer, then
I will also tell you by what
authority I do these things.
The baptism of John, where did
it come from?
From heaven or from man?
And they discussed it among
themselves, saying, If we say
from heaven, he will say to us,
Why then did you not believe
him?
But if we say from man, we are
afraid of the crowd, for they
all hold that John was a
prophet.
So they answered Jesus, We do
not know, and he said to them,
Neither will I tell you by what
authority I do these things.
So notice they're afraid of the
reaction of the crowd because
John was very popular even after
his death.
In the Gospel of John, whenever
John the Baptist is mentioned,
the author makes a point of
saying John the Baptist was not
the Messiah, which seems to
indicate that a lot of people
thought he might have been.
And the book of Acts reports
finding disciples of John the
Baptist around the Mediterranean
years after John's death.
Matthew tells us that he
preached in the wilderness of
Judea and that he baptized in
the Jordan River.
That doesn't mean he spent all
his time in that one location.
We know that he was eventually
arrested by Herod Antipos, and
Herod Antipas was in charge of
the area on the east side of the
Jordan, and John was arrested
there.
He wasn't limited to the area
of Judea, but it was probably
his main location.
Now many scholars argue that
his clothes indicate his
prophetic role.
Zechariah speaks of a time when
there will be no more false
prophets, and he says this in
Zechariah 13 4.
Also, it will come about in
that day that the prophets will
each be ashamed of his vision
when he prophesies, and they
will not put on a hairy robe in
order to deceive.
So scholars argue that there
was a kind of dress code for the
prophets, which included this
hairy robe, and that's what
Zechariah is referring to, that
false prophets would put on a
hairy robe in order to deceive
the people into believing that
they were true prophets, and
that's certainly possible.
I don't think there's enough
evidence to be definitive.
Perhaps dress code is too
strong a word.
Perhaps many prophets dress
this way, but they didn't have
to, but we don't really know.
It sounds like though, if you
wanted to look like a prophet,
you put on a hairy robe.
We find this description of
Elijah in Second Kings one,
seven and eight.
He said to them, What kind of
man was he who came up to meet
you and spoke these words to
you?
They answered him, He was a
hairy man with a leather girdle
about his loins, and he said,
It's Elijah the Tishbite.
Now it's possible that when
they say he was a hairy man, he
was physically a hairy man, or
it could be just that he wore a
hairy robe, meaning he was a
hairy man because he was wearing
this hairy camel's hair robe,
and if so, then this description
here in Kings is very
strikingly similar to the
description of John the Baptist.
We know that Elijah had a robe
and that he passed that robe on
to his successor Elisha.
The Lord tells Elijah to anoint
Elisha to be a prophet in his
place, and he does that in part
by casting his cloak or his robe
on Elijah.
This is first Kings nineteen
nineteen.
So he, that's Elijah, departed
from there and found Elisha, the
son of Shapat, who was
ploughing with twelve yoke of
oxen in front of him, and he was
the tw was with the twelfth.
Elijah passed by him and cast
his cloak upon him.
And it's possible that was a
hairy cloak, and that this
became then the tradition for
prophets to wear this hairy
mantle.
It's also possible that Matthew
included this description of
John the Baptist's appearance to
highlight the fact that he was
a prophet because he looked like
the prophet Elijah, because
both were hairy.
It's but it could be that many
of the prophets traditionally
wore this kind of hairy cloak,
and John the Baptist is
following that tradition.
I don't think there's enough
evidence to decide definitively
one way or the other, and I'm
not sure it matters, but it's
interesting.
Matthew also tells us that John
was baptizing people with
water, but one is coming who
will baptize with the Spirit.
Let's look at verses three
through twelve.
Then Jerusalem and all Judea
and all the region about the
Jordan were going out to him,
and they were baptized by him in
the river Jordan, confessing
their sins.
But when he saw many of the
Pharisees and Sadducees coming
to his baptism, he said to them,
You brood of vipers, who warned
you to flee from the wrath to
come, bear fruit in keeping with
repentance, and do not presume
to say to yourselves, We have
Abraham as our father, for I
tell you, God is able from these
stones to raise up children for
Abraham.
Even now the axe is laid to the
root of the trees, every tree
therefore that does not bear
good fruit is cut down and
thrown into the fire.
I baptize you with water for
repentance, but he who is coming
after me is mightier than I,
whose sandals I am not worthy to
carry.
He will baptize you with the
Holy Spirit and fire, his
widowing fork in his hand, and
he will clear his threshing
floor and gather his wheat into
the barn, but the chaff he will
burn with unquenchable fire.
This idea that Jesus Christ
will baptize with the Holy
Spirit and fire, while John
baptized with water is one of
the few things that are found in
all four of the Gospels.
You're probably aware that the
three synoptic gospels, Matthew,
Mark, and Luke, are quite
similar, and many of the stories
we have are found in all three
of them.
But John's Gospel is much
different.
He wrote later he had a
different agenda, and he didn't
feel the need to repeat what the
other three gospels contained.
So very little that John says
is duplicated.
In the other gospels, but this
idea that Christ will baptize
with the Holy Spirit in fire
while John baptizes with water
is one of the few things that is
in all four Gospels.
I think John the Baptist is
contrasting the outward water
baptism that he practiced with
the inward baptism of the Holy
Spirit that the Messiah brings.
Now, what's going on here?
Both the Old Testament and the
New Testament use water as a
symbol of cleansing.
It's controversial how much of
what we think of as baptism
today was going on prior to
John.
But certainly washing with
water in a ritual way meant to
symbolize ritual cleansing and
purity that was going on.
Washing with water symbolized
the washing away of the guilt of
my sins and leaving behind my
old way of living and adopting a
new way of living.
Baptism is different.
It's something you only do
once, not something you would do
repeatedly when you needed to
become ritually clean.
At the time, only proselytes
were baptized.
That is, those people who
wanted to convert to Judaism
were baptized, and their baptism
was self-administered.
This idea to baptize someone
else is new.
That's what John introduces,
this baptizing others.
And I think he's using this
ritual in a new way to
communicate something new to his
fellow Jews.
He's sending the message, you
need to convert just like a
Gentile.
Now to be baptized is to commit
yourself to the teaching of the
one in whose name you're being
baptized.
The word disciple simply means
student or one who learns from
someone else.
Disciples are those people who
say, I want to hang around and
listen to this teacher, this
rabbi, because I think God has
sent him with a message and I
want to know what it is.
There is this natural
connection between the concept
of being someone's student,
being someone's disciple, and
being baptized.
This is how John did things.
He gathered disciples.
When they repented and began to
follow him, he baptized them.
And those students identified
themselves as students or
disciples of John the Baptist.
So John the Baptist baptized
his students as the symbol of
new life and repentance and
preparation for the coming
kingdom.
John was the last to have his
own disciples, and he taught his
followers to look for the
Christ or the one who was coming
after him.
After Jesus comes fully into
his public ministry, the
apostles also teach their
followers to be baptized, but
they become followers of Christ,
not of Peter or Paul or John.
So baptism is a ritual that
symbolizes your commitment to
follow the teaching of the one
in whose name you're being
baptized.
And John the Baptist's message
is summarized as repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand.
And that phrase very succinctly
captures two main themes in
John's message repent and the
kingdom of heaven is at hand.
And I want to spend most of our
time today then thinking about
that.
First, let's start with the
kingdom of heaven.
The kingdom of heaven, the
kingdom of God, those are
synonymous phrases.
It's a central topic in both of
the testaments.
So let's start with the Old
Testament background on this
phrase.
The kingdom of God or the
kingdom of heaven refers to the
rule or the reign of God as
king.
The kingdom of heaven is that
time promised by the prophets
when God will rule over all the
earth.
Now you say, isn't that already
the case?
Isn't he already ruling over
all the earth now?
Well, yes and no.
Yes, in one sense he is ruling
over all the earth, and that it
all exists at his pleasure.
He is the one true God and
king, and all the others are
counterfeits.
We have rain because he blesses
us with rain.
We have peace and prosperity
when he decides to bless us with
peace and prosperity.
He is the king of glory and he
reigns now, and we see him very
clearly on his throne in places
like the calling of Isaiah in
Isaiah six.
But there is another sense in
which the world does not
recognize God's reign, and in
that sense we are still waiting
for him to reign.
We are waiting for the day when
every knee will bow before him
and recognize him as Lord.
And that day is coming.
A day is coming when God's rule
will be perfected over all the
earth and all creation.
When a good king is reigning
well, there is peace and
prosperity and blessing over his
kingdom, and that day is coming
for us.
The day is coming when everyone
will live in peace and
righteousness and justice, when
sin and death and corruption and
futility will all be
eliminated, and everyone will
live under the reign of God and
obey him.
This is what we say in the
Lord's Prayer Thy kingdom come,
thy will be done on earth as it
is in heaven.
We're looking for that day when
God's will will be established
perfectly over all the earth.
There will be no more
rebellion, no sin, just like
there is in heaven.
So the kingdom of heaven is
that time when all sin and
rebellion is gone, and all God's
people are blessed living under
his righteous rule.
For example, Zechariah predicts
a time when all the world will
align themselves against Israel,
but God will rescue them and
establish his rule on earth, and
then he says this in Zechariah
fourteen nine.
And the Lord will be king over
all the earth, in that day the
Lord will be the only one and
his name the only one.
So yes, God is in fact king
over all the earth now, but not
everyone recognizes that to be
true.
However, a day is coming when
that will change.
A day is coming when God will
rescue his people both
physically and spiritually and
establish his rule in a new way.
Isaiah says something similar.
This is Isaiah fifty two verses
seven to ten.
How lovely on the mountains are
the feet of him who brings good
news, who announces peace and
brings good news of happiness,
who announces salvation and says
to Zion, your God reigns.
Listen, your watchmen lift up
their voices, they shout
joyfully together, for they will
see with their own eyes when
the Lord restores Zion.
Break forth, shout joyfully
together, you waste places of
Jerusalem, for the Lord has
comforted his people, he has
redeemed Jerusalem.
The Lord has bared his holy arm
in the sight of all the
nations, that all the ends of
the earth may see the salvation
of our God.
So here the good news is
announced to Jerusalem, and that
good news is your God reigns.
The Lord will comfort and
redeem his people and restore
Jerusalem, and all the nations
will see it.
It will reach even to the ends
of the earth.
And all this good news is
captured by the phrase your God
reigns.
So even though he always
reigns, his perfect will is not
yet established on earth.
He has intervened in history to
bring salvation and
restoration, to end sin,
futility, and death, but he has
not fully and finally brought
that about.
This is what the prophets mean
by the kingdom of God or the
kingdom of heaven, that time
when God steps into history to
establish his rule once and for
all, to end sin, end death, end
rebellion, and to fully
establish justice, peace, and
righteousness.
It's the time when God
establishes his perfect rule and
law on earth.
So that's the first aspect of
the kingdom of God, but there's
a second aspect we need to know,
and that is how is God going to
establish this kingdom?
He's going to establish it
through his Messiah.
Remember that the word Messiah
simply means anointed one, and
that is a Hebrew word.
The Greek word Christ also
means the anointed one.
So the Messiah is the anointed
king of Israel, a son of David
and a son of Abraham who will
rule over all the earth.
God promised that a king would
sit on the throne of David who
would rule over all the earth.
David's kingdom was lost to the
exile, his throne was lost to
the exile, but the prophets
promised that one day a son of
David would come and rule on
David's throne again and
establish this peace and
justice.
And we saw this in the servant
songs.
We also see this in Isaiah
nine, this is nine verses six
and seven.
For a child will be born to us,
a son will be given to us, and
the government will rest on his
shoulders, and his name will be
called wonderful counselor,
mighty God, eternal father,
prince of peace.
There will be no end to the
increase of his government or of
peace on the throne of David
and over his kingdom, to
establish it and to uphold it
with justice and righteousness
from then on and forevermore,
the zeal of the Lord of hosts
will accomplish this.
So a child will be born, he
will sit on David's throne, and
his rule will establish peace
and justice over all the earth.
Jeremiah twenty three verses
five and six says the same
thing.
Behold, the days are coming,
declares the Lord, when I will
raise up for David a righteous
branch, and he will reign as
king and act wisely and do
justice and righteousness in the
land.
In his days Judah will be saved
and Israel will dwell securely,
and this is his name by which
he will be called the Lord our
righteousness.
So like a tree gets cut off at
the base and leaves only the
stump, the throne of David has
been toppled and the people
taken into exile, but from that
stump a branch will grow, a new
Davidic king who will reign
wisely and establish peace and
righteousness in the land.
And then here's a different
kind of prophecy, but it's the
same idea.
This is in Daniel seven.
Daniel is having a vision, and
he sees this in Daniel seven,
thirteen and fourteen.
I kept looking in the night
visions, and behold with the
clouds of heaven one like a son
of man was coming.
He came up to the ancient of
days and was presented before
him, and to him was given
dominion, glory, and a kingdom,
that all the peoples and nations
and men of every language might
serve him.
His dominion is an everlasting
dominion which will not pass
away, and his kingdom is one
which will not be destroyed.
So he says, One like a son of
man, in other words, a human
being, is given a kingdom over
which he will rule forever.
So we see that there is a day
coming when God will intervene
in history to establish his
rule.
He will bless his people, he
will defeat those who reject
him, and he will establish his
rule over all of creation
through the Messiah, the
anointed king of Israel.
Now there's a lot more to this
picture, there's a lot more Old
Testament passages we could look
at, but for now those are the
two aspects that we need to
know.
God will establish his rule
through a man, the Christ, the
Messiah, the anointed son of
David.
And John the Baptist's message
then is the kingdom of heaven is
at hand.
Why?
Because the king himself, the
Messiah, has come.
And Matthew's readers would be
very familiar with this concept
of a coming Messiah.
And Matthew has told us that
Messiah is Jesus, the son of
David, son of Abraham.
We have been told this through
his genealogy and the
circumstances of his birth, but
when John the Baptist first
appears, he does not announce
who the Messiah is, just that
the Messiah is coming.
Now in 311, as for me, I
baptize you with water for
repentance, but he who is coming
after me is mightier than I,
and I am not fit to remove his
sandals, he will baptize you
with the Holy Spirit and fire.
The image of the sandal comes
from the idea that when the
master of the house returned,
one of his servants would come,
remove his sandals, and wash his
feet.
And this job was usually
reserved for the lowest and most
menial of servants.
And John is saying, The Messiah
is so much greater than I am
that I am not even worthy to be
his lowest, most menial servant.
Then he says, Let's read eleven
and then twelve, as for me I
baptize you with water for
repentance, but he who is coming
after me is mightier than I,
and I am not fit to remove his
sandals, he will baptize you
with the Holy Spirit and fire.
His winnowing fork is in his
hand, and he will thoroughly
clear his threshing floor, and
he will gather his wheat into
the barn, but he will burn up
the chaff with unquenchable
fire.
So John saying, I baptize with
water, but the coming Messiah is
going to baptize with the Holy
Spirit and with fire.
And there is some scholarly
debate over what exactly is
being emphasized by this idea of
fire.
Fire can be and often is a
metaphor for purification
because fire burns away
impurities, like you heat gold,
and as you heat the gold, the
impurities rise to the top, and
then the goldsmith removes them,
skims them off the surface.
John the Baptist could be
saying that Jesus will put his
followers through a kind of
purifying ritual.
And we could speculate all day
on the different nuances of what
fire could mean, but I think
the context gives us the clue we
need and that we should see
verse 12, the very next verse,
as explaining the metaphor of
what he means by fire.
John tells us in the very next
verse that he will gather the
wheat into his barn and he will
burn the chap with fire.
And that suggests to me that
the fire he's talking about is
the fire of judgment and
destruction.
When grain was harvested, the
first step is to break up the
stalks and separate the parts
that are edible from the parts
that are not edible.
And winnowing is this process
of separating the wheat, the
part you want to eat, from the
chaff, the part that you don't
want to eat.
So winnowing involves throwing
it all up in the air and the
wind will carry the lighter
chaff away while the heavier
seeds and the edible parts fall
back into the pile, thus
separating them.
The wheat then is the good part
that you keep and you put in
your barn, and the chaff is the
useless part that you burn up
and remove.
So John is picturing mankind as
being divided into two parts,
those who accept the Messiah,
the wheat, and those who reject
the Messiah, the chaff.
And the Messiah is going to
separate all of humanity into
two groups like wheat and chaff.
And this explains, I think, the
baptism language in verse 11.
Those who accept him as the
Messiah, he will baptize with
the Holy Spirit.
Those who reject him, he quote,
baptizes with a fire of
judgment, like the fire that
burns the chaff.
And this is an either or kind
of baptism.
You get one and the or the
other.
And this is the sort of king
that John is announcing, and
that squares with the picture
that we have gleaned from the
Old Testament.
The Messiah ultimately holds
your destiny in his hands, and
that destiny will be either
repentance and renewal and a
place in the kingdom of God, or
it will be judgment and
condemnation.
And that makes perfect sense
with the other part of John the
Baptist's message.
Repent, for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand.
If you want to avoid that
judgmental fire, if you want to
avoid judgment and find a place
in the kingdom of heaven, what
must you do?
Repent.
Now repent means more than
being sorry, and it means more
than changing your mind.
Repent means to do a one
hundred eighty, to turn around,
and more often than not the
context means return to God.
We need to stop denying God
exists, stop denying that he is
God, stop denying that he is
Lord, admit we are sinners in
need of a savior, and turn back
toward God seeking his mercy.
And the arrival of the king
forces that choice.
The time to decide is now.
John could have said, The
king's here, put on your best
clothes, come on, cheer him on
the road as he defeats the
Romans, and that sort of king
doesn't require any hard choice
from me except to show up on
parade day.
But if you've read the Old
Testament, you know the arrival
of the Messiah is not going to
be this way, and the way the
Messiah arrives, God requires us
to choose.
Why didn't the Israelites
prosper in the land?
Because they chose to disobey
the Lord.
Why was the throne of David
lost and the people taken into
exile?
Why was Israel under Roman rule
at the time of Jesus?
Because the people of Israel
were faithless.
They turned away from the Lord.
Repentance is turning back to
the Lord.
The Old Testament makes it
quite clear that there is a
connection between faithfulness
and blessing.
If you want God's blessing, you
have to follow Him and trust
Him.
You have to turn back from the
direction of rebellion that
you're currently heading and
return to God and say, You are
my God, I am your servant.
The prophets announced that one
day God would spiritually
transform his people.
And what does that
transformation look like?
Well, the very first step is
repentance, turning back to God
and following him.
And this makes perfect sense.
If you want a place in the
kingdom of God, you need to turn
back and repent.
Now notice 3.6 says that they
were confessing their sins as
John baptized them.
That's another part of this
picture.
In order to find a place in the
kingdom of God, we need to have
our sins forgiven, and that
comes through confession and
repentance, acknowledging that
we are indeed sinful, that we
have turned away from God, that
we do indeed deserve judgment,
but we want to flee from those
sins and ask for grace because
of the blood of the Messiah.
Now, my understanding of the
time period is that by and large
the Jews of this day were not
particularly devout, and we see
this in John's words addressed
to the Pharisees and Sadducees.
Let's look again at seven
through ten.
But when he saw many of the
Pharisees and Sadducees coming
to his baptism, he said to them,
You brood of vipers, who warned
you to flee from the wrath to
come?
Flee from the wrath to come,
basically that means repent, and
then he tells them, Bear fruit
in keeping with repentance, and
do not presume to say to
yourselves, We have Abraham as
our father, for I tell you, God
is able from these stones to
raise up children for Abraham.
Even now the axes laid to the
root of the trees, every tree
therefore that does not bear
good fruit is cut down and
thrown into the fire.
Now he is talking to the
Pharisees and the Sadducees.
The Pharisees were a group who
were particularly zealous at law
keeping, and they looked down
on everyone else, but they were
very, very religious in their
outward actions, and they saw
the masses of people as being
not so strict, a little slack
and therefore impious.
The Sadducees were a very
different kind of group,
although they often appear with
the Pharisees in the text.
They were the aristocrats and
the leaders, they were the party
of the rich and the high
priestly families.
They were in charge of the
temple and its services, and
they were very materialistic.
They did not believe in
resurrection from the dead or
life after death, and they were
very politically motivated.
They seem to be coming here to
actually be baptized.
Now maybe they're just coming
to watch and see what's going
on.
Maybe they just want to check
out who this John the Baptist
character is, or more likely, I
think they realize how popular
John the Baptist has become, and
they want to appear like they
are part of his tribe.
However, John doesn't seem to
think they have actually
repented.
And essentially, in his little
tirade, he's calling on them to
repent.
He says, There is a wrath
coming and you need to flee from
it.
In other words, judgment is
coming and you need to flee th
from it.
But he doesn't believe they
have repentance on their mind.
I think that's what he means by
who told you to flee from the
wrath to come.
Who told you that you need to
repent, with the implication no
one did, because that's not why
you're here.
Are you really here to flee
from God's wrath, to admit that
you're a sinner in need of a
savior?
Or are you just here to be
politically correct?
So John speaks harshly to them,
calling them a nest of
poisonous snakes, presumably
because their influence is
poisonous and dangerous.
And he drives his point home
with this verses in 3, 8, and 9.
Don't think that being a
physical descendant of Abraham
is enough to save you.
It's not enough to be born a
child of Abraham.
You have to be repentant.
And if you are repentant, your
lives are going to show evidence
of that repentance.
Repentance involves a change, a
180, and we should see that
change.
So if you have truly repented,
your lives would show that you
want to change, you want to know
God, and you know you need to
change, but their lives show
that they're complacent and
confident in the fact that they
were born Jewish.
And John says, that's no big
deal.
God could take these stones and
raise up children of Abraham.
So wake up and smell the
coffee, guys, because the axe of
judgment is already here, and
those who don't repent and show
evidence of the fruit of
repentance are going to be cut
down.
So to summarize, John the
Baptist was an important and
popular figure.
He was widely accepted as a
prophet, and some thought he was
the Messiah.
His message had two parts
repent, that is, turn back to
God, for the kingdom of heaven
is at hand.
The king has arrived, and now
is the time to make your choice.
The day of judgment is coming
when the king will separate his
people from those who are not
his people, and the way to be
among his people is to repent.
Being Jewish is not enough.
The king is coming, and it's
time to turn back to God and
follow his Messiah.
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast,
and I'm so glad you are.
My mission is to explain not
only what a passage means, but
how we figure it out.
Your podcast speed may be
limited to the last 20 or so
episodes, but don't worry, you
can hear all previous episodes,
and there are about 500 of them
by going to
wednesdayintheword.com.
There are no advertisements, I
don't ask for donations, you'll
only find podcasts and Bible
study resources on my website,
and it is free and there to help
you improve your skills and
understanding.
If you want to thank me, join
the mailing list, subscribe to
the podcast, and most
importantly, tell a friend what
you learned and where you
learned it.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by my friend Reggie
Coates of heartfeltmusic.org.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you next week at Wednesday
in the world.