Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Thank you for
joining me today for the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
Today we're going to study
Galatians chapter 4, verses 1
through 11.
This is the ninth talk in my
series on the book of Galatians.
Lecture notes for today's talk
are on the link below the
podcast, or you can find them at
Wednesdaytheword.com slash
Galatians 9.
Glad to have you along.
We're starting chapter 4 of
Galatians today, and just to
review where we are in the book,
Paul wrote this book to
churches he founded on his first
missionary journey.
They have since turned away to
a false gospel.
They've been influenced by the
Judaizers who have told them
that it's not enough to believe
in Jesus.
You must also keep the law.
Paul is writing to correct
that.
In the first two chapters, he
defended his gospel and his
authority to preach it.
And then in chapters three and
four, he makes a series of five
arguments for justification by
faith alone.
And we have looked at the first
three of those arguments.
First, he says, look at your
own experience.
Did you receive the spirit
because you got your act
together and finally started
keeping the law?
Or because you heard the gospel
that Jesus died in your place
and you believed it.
And he says, You receive the
Spirit because you have faith.
And he's using that receiving
the Spirit as the sign or the
seal that God has accepted you.
His second argument is that
Scripture confirms our
experience.
The scripture teaches that
Abraham believed and God counted
that belief to him as
justification.
And that God's plan from the
beginning was for justification
to come through faith.
Before Moses even gave the law,
God had promised that all those
who had faith like Abraham
would be blessed.
In his third argument, which we
looked at in the last podcast,
Paul argued that God made a
promise to Abraham, but the law
which came later did not nullify
the promise.
So the law was a deal.
The covenant with Abraham was a
promise.
The promise to Abraham was a
one-sided covenant in which God
promised to bless Abraham and
those who have faith like him.
The law, which was a two-sided
covenant or a deal, was given to
Israel, and that did not
nullify the promise.
Now Paul's in a kind of a
tangent.
It's a related, but it's still
kind of a tangent.
He's answering the question
raised in 319, why the law then?
If the promise of God is as
good as Paul says it is, then
why was the law even given?
Is there any good reason for
it?
And Paul has been answering
that.
Yes, there is a very good
reason.
The law teaches us that we are
sinful and that we need a
savior.
God gave us the law to give us
boundaries and a kind of
protective custody.
The law was necessary because
of our tendency to choose evil.
And yes, following the law may
be a demanding and stretching
experience, but it teaches us a
very valuable lesson.
Continuing in that thought in
our passage today, he's going to
argue that having learned that
lesson, we should graduate from
law keeping to the maturity of
faith.
So Galatians 4 continues this
theme of the importance of
graduation, the importance of
being spiritually mature, and
Paul is expanding on the thought
that we went over in the last
podcast.
Let me read the whole section
and then we'll go back and walk
through it in chunks.
So I'm going to read Galatians
chapter 4, verses 1 through 11.
I mean that the heir, as long
as he is a child, is no
different from a slave, though
he is the owner of everything.
But he is under guardians and
managers until the date set by
his father.
In the same way we also, when
we were children, were enslaved
to the elementary principles of
the world.
But when the fullness of time
had come, God sent forth his son
born of a woman, born under the
law, to redeem those who were
under the law, so that we might
receive adoption as sons.
And because you are sons, God
has sent the Spirit of His Son
into our hearts, crying, Abba,
Father, so you are no longer a
slave, but a son, and if a son,
then an heir through God.
Formerly, when you did not know
God, you were enslaved to those
that by nature are not gods.
But now that you have come to
know God, or rather to be known
by God, how can you turn back
again to the weak and worthless
elementary principles of the
world whose slaves you want to
be once more?
You observe days and months and
seasons and years, I am afraid
I may have labored over you in
vain.
Let's start with the first two
verses.
I mean that the heir, as long
as he is a child, is no
different from a slave, though
he is the owner of everything,
but he is under guardians and
managers until the date set by
his father.
Paul takes an example from his
world, the Roman era, to
illustrate his point.
Noble Roman households had
these father figures who were
kind of Olympian.
They were men who lived above
the ordinary run of the mill
home life.
Roman children were not raised
by their fathers typically, but
rather by a highly educated
slave who taught and directed
them like a drill master or a
guardian, like he was just
referring to in the previous
section.
Here Paul is pointing to the
irony of that kind of family
situation.
The son will someday be master
of the estate.
When he comes of age, the son
will actually own the slave from
whom he is now taking
direction.
So when the son is a child, the
slave is master over the son.
The slave tells him when to go
to bed, when to get up, what to
eat, when to eat it, what to
study, when to study, how to be
polite and respectful, and the
slave pretty much disciplines
him and controls his life.
While he is underage, there's a
sense in which the son is no
different than a slave, even
though he is the heir to the
household.
For the young child, from his
perspective, there's very little
difference between being an
heir and being a slave.
In fact, there's no appreciable
difference between being a
slave and being a son until the
child reaches his age of
majority.
Then he becomes owner of the
very slave from whom he took
direction.
So childhood consists of this
kind of slavery, this kind of
restriction.
It's a life under a taskmaster.
But when childhood ends, that
relationship ends.
It points toward the fullness
of time, the date set by the
father when the child will be
considered a grown-up and given
adult freedom and adult
responsibility.
Paul goes on to explain his
analogy.
This is three through five.
In the same way, we also, when
we were children, were enslaved
to the elementary principles of
the world.
But when the fullness of time
had come, God sent forth his
son, born of a woman, born under
the law, to redeem those of us
who were under the law, so that
we might receive adoption as
sons.
So the first question we want
to ask in these verses is who is
we?
Paul tells us it's those under
the law, and I think in this
context, he's got believing Jews
in mind.
Remember, the near context is
he's answering a question about
the place of the law.
Why was the law given?
And the far context is this
issue of whether Gentiles must
keep the law in order to be
saved.
Now here he's spelling out his
metaphor.
When we were under the law, we
Jews were like that Roman child
taking orders from a slave until
he reaches the age of majority.
But at the right time, God sent
his son, the Messiah, Jesus
Christ, to redeem us from under
the law so that we might be
reconciled to God and adopted
into the family of God.
Now, why does Paul emphasize
born of a woman born under the
law in this context?
I'm not really sure.
He seems to be emphasizing the
human personhood of Jesus.
I suspect he might have
something in mind like the
argument he makes in Romans 5.
There in Romans, Paul draws a
parallel between the one man
Adam and the one man Jesus.
The man Adam introduced the
problem of sin to the human
race.
What's the solution to the
problem?
It's not the law.
The law can't solve the problem
of our sin.
The solution is another man, a
second Adam, and the man Jesus
will solve the problem of our
sin.
Jesus was born under the
covenant.
He wasn't an outsider.
He grew up under the law.
He understood it.
He learned it.
He followed it.
He was not an enemy of the law.
He lived under the law and kept
it.
He understands all its plans,
purposes, and goals.
I think that's kind of what
he's emphasizing here, that
Jesus as a man lived under the
covenant just like we did.
He uses this other interesting
phrase in 4.3 and 4.9, this
Greek word that's translated
elemental things or elementary
principles of the world.
I think by that he means the
basics, the stuff of
kindergarten, the stuff of
childhood, like what you would
learn in elementary school.
Like the child in the
household, we were ruled by the
basics.
We needed to learn and be
taught the basic principles to
grow to adulthood.
So children need to learn their
ABCs if they want to read.
Children need to learn to read
so they can cope as adults in
the world.
They need to learn the basics
of math to function as an adult.
They need to learn to write and
to be able to communicate.
They need to know the rules of
their culture, how to be polite,
what's respectful, what's
expected in various social
situations.
All that is the basics, the
elementary stuff.
It is the stuff that you learn
in childhood, and you must learn
it.
You are enslaved to it in that
sense, but eventually you leave
it behind.
In the same way that the heir
in a household, at least in
Rome, was under the rule of a
guardian, we were enslaved to
the elementary principles of the
world, which I think in this
context is the world of the law.
And by enslaved, I think he
means we didn't have the option
of not keeping the law.
It was our master, it was our
guardian.
We were in its protective
custody.
Ignoring the law was not an
option.
It's compulsory, like it's
compulsory for a child to obey
his guardian.
But when the fullness of time
came, just as the child
eventually comes of age and
becomes the owner, at the right
time God sent his son, Jesus the
Messiah, to buy us out of our
slavery to the law so that God
could adopt us as sons.
Now, if you redeem a slave, you
pay a price and buy their
freedom.
We were under God's wrath,
enslaved to our sin, facing
condemnation on judgment day,
and no amount of law keeping
could change that.
We desperately need someone to
pay the price to buy us out of
that slavery, and that's what
Jesus did on the cross.
That's the concept of
redemption.
Jesus came and redeemed those
under the covenant, under the
law.
Now, obviously, Jesus redeemed
Gentile believers too, but
Paul's talking about the Jews
and their relationship to the
law here.
I don't think he has the
Gentiles in mind yet, but he's
about to.
His point right now is like a
child in the house who is under
the rule of his governess, so
the Jews were under the rule of
the law.
Like a child follows the rule
set by his governess, so the
Jews followed the law.
They ate the way the law said
to eat, they dressed the way the
law said to dress.
They celebrated the feasts and
made the offerings that the law
prescribed.
They rested the way the
covenant said to rest, and so
forth.
But like a child in a
household, there was a date set
when they would transition from
being a child to being an adult.
That date corresponds to the
coming of the Messiah.
Now, like a child who has come
of age and reached majority, the
believing Jews are no longer
under the rule of the law.
When the fullness of time had
come, when all the time had
passed that God and his purposes
had set between giving the law
and the coming of the Messiah,
when that time passed, the
Messiah came, and with the
coming of the Messiah, the
believing Jews' relationship to
the law changes in the same way
the child's relationship to the
household changes when he comes
of age.
What is that change?
Paul goes on to explain.
This is four, six, and seven.
And because you are sons, God
sent the Spirit of His Son into
our hearts, crying, Abba Father,
so you are no longer a slave,
but a son, and if a son, then an
heir through God.
Now notice the pronoun shift.
Paul's now shifting from
speaking of believing Jews, I
think, to believers in general.
All the believers in Galatia,
both Jew and Gentile, are now
sons.
Not only did the we believing
Jews experience this change,
becoming adult children of God,
so you Gentiles are sons as
well.
You're not little children
under the custody of the law
either.
You are also sons.
And two things change.
God is now father, and we are
no longer slaves.
The father is no longer this
Olympian, distant,
unapproachable figure to us.
Rather, he is now someone we
address as Abba or Daddy.
The Aramaic word Abba means
daddy or papa.
It conveys intimacy.
Abba is typically the first
word a child would learn.
It was used by children to
address their earthly fathers.
It was also used to address a
person of respected rank, so a
student could address a
respected teacher, for example,
as Abba.
It affirms both the respect of
I am addressing a superior, but
also a profound personal
relationship between the speaker
and the one addressed.
By contrast, in the Old
Testament, Father is never used
as direct address to God.
The Hebrew word father is used
only about a dozen times with
reference to God in the Old
Testament, and most of those are
part of a simile or a metaphor.
So in the Old Testament, we see
Father as a metaphor to
describe what God is like.
In the New Testament, Jesus
then uses this Aramaic title
Abba, which expresses both our
profound respect for God and our
profound relationship to Him.
Now there's some uncertainty
about how common it was for Jews
of the day to refer to God as
Father.
Some scholars I found argued
that it was never done, and that
Jesus is introducing a new and
revolutionary way of speaking to
God.
Others argued that while it
wasn't common, it was done, so
this isn't all that new or
unusual, and I don't know which
position is correct.
What's clear is that Jesus made
Father his preferred way of
talking about God to us.
When he talks about God to us,
he refers to God as our heavenly
father, and it's a great
metaphor for God.
A father imparts life to his
children, a father cares about
and cares for his children, a
father passes on an inheritance
to his children, a father is
wiser than his children and
teaches them.
Children respect and seek to
imitate their father, and we see
all those ideas in Scripture in
talking about God as our
father.
So that's the first change.
The second change involves
moving from a slave to a son and
an heir.
Since God is now our father, we
can leave behind the drill
instructor, the guardian of the
law, and leave behind all those
elementary things.
We are no longer under God's
wrath, we are no longer
rebellious children, the price
of our guilt has been paid and
we can be reconciled to God.
And that means having been
reconciled, we can be adopted
into his family and he will give
us his spirit.
We don't need the law to fence
us in anymore because now we
have the spirit to teach us and
make us people who choose what
is right and good.
We can know God by coming to
know Jesus, we can relate to God
and understand him, learn to
value what he values, learn to
think like him and be conform to
his character because we now
belong to his son and he has
given us his spirit.
So we no longer need to follow
the dictates of the law, it is
no longer our guardian.
We are no longer slaves to the
law, but heirs entitled to
inherit all the riches of the
promises of Abraham.
Instead of being told what to
do by the law, we now make our
own decisions on some other
basis.
Now Paul doesn't spell out here
what that basis is, but as we
get into the later chapters in
Galatians, he is going to tell
us, he is going to tell us that
now we follow the dictates of
our Master Jesus, or as Paul
puts it, we do what the Spirit
of His Son tells us to do.
God now teaches and guides us
through the work of the Spirit.
Since we are now forgiven and
reconciled to God because of the
cross, God is free to give us
his life-giving spirit who
teaches us and opens our eyes to
the truth.
As we learn and grow, the
spirit gives us understanding,
and we become more and more
people who want to live like
Jesus, people who love God and
love our neighbors.
As the Spirit sanctifies us, we
learn to hear and obey the
truth.
The instruction of the law no
longer governs our actions.
Instead, the instruction of the
Spirit of God now governs our
actions.
But that's stuff he's going to
spell out in chapter five.
Now there is a great deal of
overlap between the instruction
of the Spirit and the law.
Much of what the Spirit is
teaching us to do, we could
learn from obeying the law.
But Paul's point right here in
this section is that the Messiah
has come, the law no longer
controls and governs us.
Now the Spirit of God controls
and governs us and influences
our life and choices and
behavior.
And again, we'll get into that
into more detail as we get into
chapter five.
Let's finish this part of
Paul's argument.
Let me read verses eight
through eleven.
Formerly, when you did not know
God, you were enslaved to those
that by nature are not gods,
but now that you have come to
know God, or rather to be known
by God, how can you turn back
again to the weak and worthless
elementary principles of the
world, whose slaves you want to
be once more?
You observe days and months and
seasons and years.
I am afraid I may have labored
over you in vain.
Notice again the pronoun here
is you.
I think he's speaking to the
Gentile believers in the
Galatian churches.
He's saying, You Gentiles did
not know God the way the Jews
knew God.
You didn't have any history
with him.
You didn't know the rich
heritage of the history of the
nation of Israel, and you didn't
have that to teach you about
God.
Instead, you were enslaved to
idols, things that are man made
and not gods at all.
Idols are just blocks of wood
and hunks of gold and silver,
and they offer counterfeit
promises.
Chasing them is like chasing
the wind.
They didn't create the
universe, they don't ordain
history.
They are nothing, but you
thought they were gods, so you
did what you thought you needed
to do to appease them and gain
their favor.
Your life was controlled and
governed by what you thought
those gods required.
But now, having come to know
the one true God through the
Messiah, why would you want to
go back to all those rules and
rituals?
Neither keeping the Jewish law
nor following the dictates of
idols solves the problem of sin.
You simply cannot make yourself
acceptable to God by following
the dictates of any religion's
rules and regulations.
No amount of outward obedience
changes the fact that we are
motivated by sin and selfishness
inside.
God never intended to grant
mercy through law keeping.
From the foundation of the
world he planned to send the
Messiah to redeem us.
Those under the old covenant
looked forward to the coming of
the Messiah, and we look
backward to his first coming and
forward to the To his second,
but all of us are going to be
saved through faith in the blood
of Christ.
In 4, 9 through 11, Paul asks,
if you're an heir now, why would
you go back to childhood and
slavery?
What would persuade you to
limit yourself the way a child
needs to be limited when you
were meant for maturity?
Let's think about that a little
bit.
When my children are young and
growing up, they had many
restrictions.
And we had lots of discussions
over the rules and regulations
we built into their lives.
Don't cross the street unless
you're holding the hand of an
adult.
Don't talk to strangers.
Don't approach the neighbor's
dog unless the neighbor is there
holding the leash.
You need to be home by eleven
or ten or whatever.
You need to budget your
allowance.
Here are the rules about
homework.
Call me when you arrive safely.
We gave them all kinds of rules
to keep them safe and also to
teach them right from wrong and
how to make wise choices.
As they grew in wisdom and
maturity, the rules relaxed and
changed.
We expected them to begin
taking responsibility for
themselves and acting as a
responsible adult.
We expected them to manage
their own lives without us
making a hundred rules for them.
Eventually they set their own
bedtime, they managed their own
money, and they completed their
own homework.
They made their own lunches,
they did their own laundry, and
they set their own homework
schedule.
They grew up.
And Paul's arguing that the law
functioned in a similar way.
It was necessary and helpful
while we were immature children
and especially rebellious
adolescents, but now we ought to
be spiritually mature.
My children are adults now and
they have kids of their own.
Why would my grown children
ever want to go back to the
restrictions of childhood?
That's the argument Paul is
making.
The Judaizers are teaching you
that you need to go back to
childhood and place yourself
under the guardianship of the
law.
They're telling you to follow
the dietary rules, keep kosher,
be circumcised, attend all the
feasts and festivals.
But now that the Messiah has
come, the Jews aren't even
obligated to keep the law in the
same way, and neither are you.
Believing Jews are free of that
lifestyle, and so are you.
The Spirit of God at work in
you testifies to the fact that
you are a child of God.
You don't need any other proof.
You don't need to earn God's
favor through law keeping.
You have it.
You have tangible observable
evidence that you have God's
favor because you have his
spirit changing you from the
inside out.
Paul's going to talk more about
the work of the Spirit in the
next chapter, so we'll talk more
about it then.
His point here is you Gentiles
are heirs and nothing less.
God has intervened in Christ.
God is your loving Father, not
your taskmaster.
When we need wisdom, he'll
supply it, he'll make us
courageous.
We've been given gifts to serve
him and a calling to explore,
and we were made for freedom and
maturity under the Lordship of
Christ.
He then ends this with a
warning in 10 and 11 you observe
days and months and seasons and
years.
I am afraid I may have labored
over you in vain.
Paul raises the fear that they
will succumb to the teachings of
the Judaizers, that they will
return to spiritual childhood
despite all his teaching and his
prayers.
He fears that all his work
among them was in vain.
I think this phrase, observe
days and months and seasons, is
a reference to the prescriptions
of the Mosaic Law.
Drill instructors are necessary
for juvenile delinquents, but
they are not necessary for those
who have learned the lessons
and graduated.
Why go back to the days,
months, seasons, and years of
the Jewish ceremonial laws and
calendar?
Why go back to those kind of
childhood restrictions?
Why would anybody who has
graduated ever want to go back
to the life of a minor?
Having received our
justification by faith, we
should rejoice in our freedom in
Christ.
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
My mission is to explain not
only what a passage means, but
show you how to figure it out.
Please rate and review us on
your favorite podcast app.
The more people who do that,
the easier it is for others to
find us.
But even more important, tell a
friend what you learned and
where you learned it.
You can hear all previous
episodes in this series as well
as find many other series on my
website, WednesdayInTheWord.com.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by my friend and
favorite musician Reggie Coates.
You can find his music and his
CDs on heartfeltmusic.org.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm Krissan Murata and I'll see
you next week at Wednesday in
the Word.
In the meantime, I hope you
find some time to visit my
website, WednesdayInTheWord.com,
and take advantage of some of
my free Bible study resources.