Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: You're listening
to the Wednesday in the Word
podcast, and I'm glad you are.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
Today we're gonna look at 1
Corinthians 10, verse 14,
through chapter 11, verse 1, and
this is the 27th talk in our
series on 1 Corinthians.
You can follow along with
lecture notes for today's talk
on the link below the podcast,
or you can find them on my
website, Wednesdayintheword.com
slash 1 Corinthians 2.7.
You'll find lots of helpful
information to improve your
Bible study on the website.
There's no charge, no spam, no
advertisements, only Bible
study.
So let's get started.
We're finishing chapter 10 of 1
Corinthians today, and this is
the conclusion of a section that
began in chapter 8.
And I'm including chapter 11,
verse 1 because I think that
verse more properly goes with
this argument.
The church in Corinth has been
arguing over the issue of
whether it's okay for believers
to eat meat that was sacrificed
to idols.
One group insists that that's
perfectly okay.
We have the right to eat this
meat and the freedom to eat this
meat because there's nothing
wrong with eating it.
The idols are fake and the meat
is just meat.
But the other group is arguing
that eating the meat is a form
of participating in idolatry and
we should abstain.
In chapter eight, Paul agreed,
yes, it is okay to eat the meat,
but that freedom is not
absolute.
If eating the meat sacrificed
to idols would cause someone
else to stumble, then we should
avoid eating it out of love for
our neighbor.
Then in chapter nine, Paul used
his own situation as an example
of how we ought to limit our
freedoms and exercise our
freedoms.
And he argued as an apostle, he
has the right to take support
from those he preaches to.
But also in that chapter he
tells us that he declined
support for his own sake as
well, that his free choice to
work instead of taking support
showed that he believed this
gospel he preaches, that he
valued the gospel he preaches
more than money, and he isn't
just in it for the money or
doing it out of compulsion.
The Corinthians are facing the
same kind of test in this
question of eating meat.
The test is is the gospel the
real and valuable truth that I
claim to believe such that I'm
willing to limit my choices and
my freedoms to gain it?
Or do I just want to have my
own way and eat whatever I want
to eat whenever I want to eat
it?
Chapter ten then continues that
theme.
Paul used the example of the
Israelites in the wilderness to
remind the Corinthians that each
individual has to choose to
follow Christ.
It's not enough to be part of
the tribe and go through the
motions of being religious.
You have to personally believe
the promises of the gospel.
And I'm going to go through
eleven one because I think that
verse belongs in the section.
And we're going to cover a lot
of verses today because we've
been discussing these ideas for
the last three chapters, and
he's summarizing them.
So they should be familiar to
you if you've been listening
along.
So I'm going to start in first
Corinthians ten fourteen and
read through eleven one.
Therefore, my beloved, flee
from idolatry.
I speak as to wise men, you
judge what I say.
Is not the cup of blessing
which we bless a sharing in the
blood of Christ?
Is not the bread which we break
a sharing in the body of
Christ?
Since there is one bread, we
who are many are one body, for
we all partake of the one bread.
Look at the nation Israel.
Are not those who eat the
sacrifices sharers in the altar?
What do I mean then?
That a thing sacrificed to
idols is anything or that an
idol is anything?
No, but I say that these things
which the Gentiles sacrifice,
they sacrifice to demons and not
to God, and I do not want you
to become sharers in demons.
You cannot drink the cup of the
Lord and the cup of demons, you
cannot partake of the table of
the Lord and the table of
demons.
Or do we provoke the Lord to
jealousy?
We are not stronger than he,
are we?
All things are lawful, but not
all things are profitable.
All things are lawful, but not
all things edify.
Let no one seek his own good
but that of his neighbor.
Eat anything that is sold in
the meat market without asking
questions for conscience sake,
for the earth is the Lord's and
all it contains.
If one of the unbelievers
invites you and you want to go,
eat anything that is set before
you without asking questions for
conscience sake.
But if anyone says to you, this
is meat sacrificed to idols, do
not eat it for the sake of the
one who informed you and for
conscience sake.
I mean not your own conscience,
but the other man's, for why is
my freedom judged by another's
conscience?
If I partake with thankfulness,
why am I ashamed concerning
that for which I give thanks?
Whether then you eat or drink,
or whatever you do, do all to
the glory of God, give no
offense either to Jews or to
Greeks or to the Church of God,
just as I also please all men in
all things, not seeking my own
profit, but the profit of the
many, so that they may be saved,
be imitators of me just as I
also am of Christ.
In this section, we find Paul
wrapping up two themes that he's
been talking about since
chapter eight, and it's
important that we understand
both of them.
The question has been, is it
okay to eat meat sacrificed to
idols?
And one of his themes is that
the way we exercise our freedoms
says something about us.
And Paul has argued yes, in
theory we are free to eat the
meat sacrificed to idols, but in
practice we need to act out of
love for our neighbor.
If the impact of my eating such
meat is that I cause another to
stumble, then I should limit my
freedom and not eat the meat.
And some in the Corinthian
Church, in their sophisticated
knowledge, have pressured other
immature believers to join them
in eating which would violate
their conscience in this matter.
And Paul has argued it is
unloving and dangerous to
encourage another believer to do
what that believer thinks is
wrong.
And Paul has been exploring
this question of considering the
impact of your actions on other
people.
Are you becoming a stumbling
block to other people inciting
them to disobey God even though
you are right in thinking the
action itself is okay?
You're right in your
understanding, but they don't
agree with you, and if you
pressure them to join you, you
are encouraging them to disobey
God.
So that's the first theme.
The second theme is the idea
that the Corinthians want to
exercise their freedom because
of a cavalier casual attitude
toward idolatry.
It's not just that they want to
eat the meat, it's that they
also enjoy flirting with
idolatry.
They see themselves as cool and
hip and sophisticated in
skating along this line and
dabbling in idolatry.
And notice Paul starts this
section with therefore flee from
idolatry.
At first read that's confusing
because on the top level, no one
on either side of this debate
is engaging in idolatry.
The meat eaters know the idols
are fake and the abstainers are
abstaining.
So why would Paul start his
conclusion with therefore flee
from idolatry?
Well, I think he's addressing
this other level, this third
level, as I called it in the
last podcast, of maybe they're
crossing a line that they ought
not to be crossing.
Paul suspects that they are
insisting on eating the meat and
encouraging their immature
neighbors to join them because
they're really kind of soft on
idolatry and they want to
participate a little bit.
He's addressing this underlying
agenda they have.
They're not just exercising
their freedom, they are verging
on participating in idolatry
itself.
And Paul's been hitting both of
these themes.
Not only do you need to be
mindful of your impact on
others, you also need to be
careful that this freedom you're
exercising isn't a covering for
your own sinful desires and an
excuse to indulge yourself in
things you shouldn't.
So Paul starts with his second
theme.
Let's read ten fourteen and
fifteen again.
Therefore, my beloved, flee
from idolatry.
I speak as to wise men, you
judge what I say.
I think there's a bit of
sarcasm in this language.
You'll remember from the first
four chapters of the letter that
some in Corinth had concluded
that Paul was not wise, and they
saw themselves as the ones who
were in fact wise.
Now Paul clearly does not think
they're particularly wise or
mature in the faith, but they
think they're wise and mature in
the faith.
They base their argument to eat
the meat on their knowledge.
They know the truth about
idols.
They know that the idols are
fake and the meat is just meat,
while these other guys, they're
just confused and naive, but
they know better.
When Paul says I speak as to
wise men, I think he's saying,
You Corinthians think you're so
wise?
Okay, judge what I say.
Doesn't this make sense?
While he is being a little
sarcastic, I don't think he's
mocking them.
He calls them beloved in the
previous verse.
I think he's gently prodding
them.
Stop and think.
Start making the right choices.
Think about what I'm saying.
Doesn't this make sense?
And then he goes on to make his
argument in ten sixteen through
eighteen.
Is not the cup of blessing
which we bless a sharing in the
blood of Christ?
Is not the bread which we break
a sharing in the body of
Christ?
Since there is one bread, we
who are many are one body, for
we all partake of the one bread.
Look at the nation Israel, are
not those who eat the sacrifices
sharers in the altar?
So the key word in this section
is sharing, and this is the
Greek word coininia, which often
gets translated as fellowship.
The idea of this word is having
a share in something with
someone else.
I am joining and partaking with
the rest of the group.
If I have fellowship with a
certain group, I belong to that
group.
I participate in whatever
benefits you gain by being in
that group.
In our modern Christian
vernacular, we tend to use the
word fellowship as a synonym for
friendship or simply going to
the same meeting place at the
same time.
But the idea, I think, is more
that we are fellow believers, we
belong to the same tribe, we
are members of the same body.
And the picture Paul's painting
is when we share the cup and
the bread in the Lord's Supper,
we're participating together in
the life that Christ gives.
We belong to Christ.
We share together in the life
of Christ.
When we take communion
together, part of the symbolism
is that together we share in the
life of Christ.
We share this cup and bread
because all of us are looking to
the same Savior and to share in
the life that Christ offers.
And we do this together because
we see ourselves belonging to
Christ.
And Paul mentions two religious
meals here.
He mentions the Lord's Supper
communion, a ceremony where
Christians commemorate the
sacrifice of Christ on our
behalf that brings life to us.
And he talks about eating at
the Jewish temple.
At the Jewish temple, you would
make a sacrifice, typically a
meat offering of some kind, and
after the ritual was over, you
could eat part of the meat that
was left.
So this was a very similar
practice to what was happening
in the pagan temples.
And Paul's saying, look at
these two religious meals.
Aren't the people who
participate in this ritual
saying, We share in this group?
We are part of this group.
This is the group we belong to.
When we take communion, we're
saying we share in the benefits
of the sacrifice of Christ's
body and blood together.
When the Jews ate the meat in
the temple, they were saying we
share in the benefits of the
sacrifice to our God.
Okay, think about what I'm
saying, you wise Corinthians,
what do you think you're saying
when you eat at the pagan
temple?
If the Jews had gone to the
temple and then gone home to eat
afterwards, it wouldn't have
been the same kind of meal, even
if they ate the exact same meat
at home that they had just
sacrificed in the temple,
because eating at the temple is
part of the ritual, it's part of
the symbolism.
We're eating together because
we belong to the group of people
who look to God for life and
blessings, and we are looking
for these sacrifices to be
effective on our behalf, and
we're eating together to
celebrate that hope together.
These religious meals are
intended to be about more than
simply eating.
They're about sharing, they're
about participating.
When I take the Lord's Supper,
I'm saying I want to be part of
God's people.
I want to share in the benefits
of the sacrifice of Christ.
If I'm not interested in
Christ's sacrifice, then I have
no business participating.
Likewise, when the Jews ate at
the temple, they were saying we
are part of God's people.
They want to share in the
benefits of the sacrifice they
just offered and the promises of
God.
The eating of these meals then
is about sharing, belonging,
being part of the group.
So what do you think you're
saying when you eat at the pagan
temple?
Now Paul is not saying that
there is some property in the
food itself that makes you part
of God's people.
He argued earlier it's just
plain meat, the idols are fake,
there's nothing mystical or
magical about it.
And he hasn't changed his mind
on that.
But he's saying the meal has
symbolism.
The meal is about koinania.
It's about fellowship and
sharing.
It's about sharing in the life
of Christ and saying together we
are in this group of people who
hope in the promises bought by
the blood and body of Christ.
They are intended to remind us
of something.
And at a minimum, they say, I
left that group and now I'm part
of this group.
When I take the Lord's Supper,
I say I belong to Christ.
When I go to the Jewish temple,
my actions say I'm part of the
Jewish people.
When I go to the pagan temple,
my actions say I want to be part
of this pagan God.
And he's warning them, you
can't be in every group.
You have to choose which group
you want to share in.
He explains that in ten
nineteen through twenty two.
What do I mean then?
That a thing sacrificed to
idols is anything or that an
idol is anything?
No, but I say that the things
which the Gentiles sacrifice,
they sacrifice to demons and not
to God, and I do not want you
to become sharers in demons.
You cannot drink the cup of the
Lord and the cup of demons.
You cannot partake of the table
of the Lord and the table of
demons, or do we provoke the
Lord to jealousy?
We are not stronger than he,
are we?
I think the strength of his
warning here and what he's
saying tips us off that this
issue is about more than the
freedom to eat meat.
The Corinthians are flirting
with idolatry and they're
dabbling in idolatry, and Paul
is strongly warning them against
trying to have a foot in both
camps.
Why?
Because while it's true the
idols are fake, the demons are
real.
Now he's not saying the meat is
tainted and you'll get
possessed if you eat it, because
he's going to end this section
by saying, look, if someone
serves you meat, don't ask where
it came from, just eat it.
The meat itself, as he argued
earlier, is not the problem.
It has no magical power.
But remember the history of
Israel.
They would meet these other
people who worshiped other gods,
and then they would start
participating in the rituals and
sacrifices to these other gods.
They didn't always renounce
Yahweh, they just tried to have
it both ways.
They tried to incorporate both
sets of practices.
They mixed in a little pagan
practice with their worship of
the Lord, and the prophets
rebuked them for that.
And that's the kind of thing
Paul's warning against here.
To choose to add the practices
of some other god is to choose
against the Lord.
God has said, Look, I have no
partners, I only have
competitors.
If you want to worship Baal or
Malek, then you have decided not
to worship me, the Lord.
Worshiping both gods is not an
option.
You choose the Lord, or you can
choose one of all these other
gods or all the other gods, but
if you choose the Lord, he is
the one and only one you can
choose.
As we talked about in the last
podcast, idolatry is mixing the
worship of other gods into the
worship of Yahweh.
It's looking to someone or
something else other than Yahweh
to bring you life and
blessings.
So idolatry is playing both
sides of the table, trying to
keep any and all other gods
happy rather than recognizing
the creator and author of the
universe as the one and only
true God.
Just like the Israelites
slipped into these practices of
the pagans around them, the
Corinthians are being tempted by
their culture to slip into
their pagan practices.
And we know from the early
chapters that there is a group
in the Corinthian church who is
really attracted to the
sophisticated, powerful,
beautiful, elite people of
Corinth.
They want to belong to that
group.
And they wanted Paul to change
his message so that that group
would like it better.
Paul was embarrassing to them
because he offended this group.
And that group probably eats at
the temple.
And if the Corinthians eat
there too, they can sit at the
table with them, sharing the
meals with them, and belong to
that elite, sophisticated,
powerful people of the town.
They don't want to look like
these other stodgy Christians
who think Jesus is the only way
and who listen to Paul and won't
set foot in a pagan temple
door.
Now, obviously I don't know
their exact motivations and
thinking, but that seems likely
to me given all the pieces of
evidence we have about what was
going on in Corinth.
It's a plausible explanation
for why Paul is giving this
warning.
No one knows exactly what they
were thinking, but downplaying
the exclusive claims of Christ
in order to find acceptance in
the community is a likely
possibility.
Whatever their motivation, Paul
seems concerned that some of
the Corinthians who are
insisting on their freedom to
eat the meat are in fact
drifting into idolatry.
They're mixing a little pagan
practice into their
Christianity, and Paul's saying
that's not an option.
Choosing a little bit of other
gods is choosing not to belong
to Christ.
You may know the idols are
fake, but the demons are real.
There are other forces out
there who would love to knock
you off the path of following
Christ.
They would love to entice you
into a little idolatry because
that's all it takes.
God is a jealous God.
You follow him and no one else.
And if they can get you to take
a little step off that path in
the direction of an idol, then
they've got you.
So remember, a religious meal
says I'm part of this group.
I share in this group.
The problem is not the meal
itself, the problem is
participating in a meal that's
dedicated to a deity other than
God.
Because part of the symbolism
of taking that meal is I belong
to this other God.
And Paul is warning them
there's the creator God, the
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
and there's everything else.
And behind all those other gods
are the powers of evil, the
demons.
The pagans may be ignorant
about what they're really doing.
If they're not sacrificing to
God, they're sacrificing to
these other powers besides God,
but you should know better, you
Corinthians.
And his concern is that I would
knowingly and deliberately
associate myself with a meal
that says I belong to this other
God when in fact I do not
belong to them.
To that group.
1021.
You cannot drink the cup of the
Lord and the cup of demons.
You cannot partake of the table
of the Lord and the table of
demons.
He's saying you can't belong to
both groups.
You can't go on Sunday to the
Corinthian church and take
communion and then on Monday go
to the temple dining room and
partake of their religious meal.
You can't have it both ways.
You may know there's no idol,
but that's not the message
you're sending.
You're sending the message I am
part of something other than
God, and that's a line you
should not cross.
You're sending the message that
you are part of something you
should have nothing to do with,
and you need to decide which
community you want to belong to.
In 1022, or do we provoke the
Lord to jealousy?
We are not stronger than he,
are we?
Jealousy is the word that God
used when he insisted that his
people worship him alone.
He says in the Old Testament, I
am a jealous God.
The analogy he's using is like
a husband who wants his wife to
be faithful to him alone, God is
jealous.
He's not satisfied with the
answer, Oh, but honey, I come
home to you too.
The husband has a right to be
jealous, and that's the analogy.
God is like the jealous
husband, and Israel is like the
adulterous wife who is messing
around with other gods.
And Paul's saying, what you're
doing here in these temple
meals, you're putting yourself
in the same place that Israel
was.
You're messing around with
these other gods.
Don't you know that's gonna
provoke the Lord to jealousy?
Do you think God's gonna look
the other way?
Do you think that you're
stronger than he is and you can
prevail against him?
You can toy with him and go
behind his back and think he's
not gonna notice?
Not gonna happen.
You have to decide which group
you belong to.
You can't eat at both tables.
Now Poco's back to his other
theme of thinking about your
impact on others, and the issue
I think at this point shifts
from am I being idolatrous to
how do my actions influence
others?
So ten twenty three and twenty
four, all things are lawful but
not all things are profitable.
All things are lawful, but not
all things edify.
Let no one seek his own good
but that of his neighbor.
You may recognize this language
from earlier in the book.
Paul used it when he was
discussing sexuality, and now
he's using it again in this
context.
And he's saying, Yes, it's
lawful to eat the meat
sacrificed to idols, but is it
worth doing?
It's legal, but does it edify?
The question is not whether
it's okay, whether it's legal.
The question is are my actions
harming someone else?
It's not enough to be able to
say, look, I'm following the
rules.
The rules allow my behavior.
I have to ask what impact is my
behavior having?
Now we've talked about this
quite a bit in the last few
podcasts, so I won't go through
that line of thinking again.
Let's look at his summary.
This is ten twenty five through
twenty eight.
Eat anything that is sold in
the meat market without asking
questions for conscience sake,
for the earth is the Lord and
all it contains.
If one of the unbelievers
invites you and you want to go,
eat anything that is set before
you without asking questions for
conscience sake.
But if anyone says to you this
is meat sacrificed to idols, do
not eat it for the sake of the
one who informed you and for
conscience sake.
This is Paul's summary of what
your conscience should lead you
to do.
So he says, First, at the meat
market, just buy the meat.
You don't need to ask where it
came from.
You can buy it and you can eat
it.
The meat at the meat market no
longer belongs to any idol.
There's no symbolism in buying
it.
In fact, it belongs to the
Lord.
You can be grateful for the
gifts he gives you, buy it, take
it home and eat it.
Second, if you go to an
unbeliever's house for dinner,
just eat the meat.
Don't ask where it came from,
it doesn't matter where it came
from.
This meal is just a meal.
It has no symbolic value and
you have the freedom to eat the
meat.
But if someone says, hey, this
meat is sacrificed to idols,
implying they're concerned about
it and they understand eating
it to be wrong, then don't eat
it.
Don't send the message that
it's okay to do that which you
believe to be evil.
When you become aware that
you're communicating a message
that you have no business
communicating, then you need to
stop.
Likewise, if they invite you
over to dinner and say, this is
idle meat, and they see it as a
significant fact of worshiping
their God, then don't eat it.
If they're essentially saying,
Does your faith in Jesus keep
you from joining me in idolatry?
The answer is yes.
If they would interpret your
eating as joining them in
idolatry, then you ought not to
eat.
So it's all about what they
understand you to be saying.
It's all about what message am
I communicating to others?
I don't want to send the
message that I don't care about
what's right and wrong, and I
don't want to send the message
that I can participate in the
worship of other gods.
Then he clarifies in ten twenty
nine and thirty, I mean not
your own conscience, but the
other man's for why is my
freedom judged by another's?
If I partake with thankfulness,
why am I slandered concerning
that for which I give thanks?
Paul's saying, In my own
conscience, in my own
understanding of what's right to
do, I'm free to eat the meat.
That hasn't changed.
Just because someone else
thinks differently about the
question does not change my
conscience.
I'm free in my own home to do
what I want and no one else's
conscience is in view there.
My freedom hasn't changed.
I will exercise that freedom
when appropriate, but I care
about you and I will choose not
to exercise my freedom when it
helps and edifies you.
So I think he's stopping to
clarify, look, theology hasn't
changed, I haven't changed my
understanding, don't get
confused here, I haven't changed
my understanding, I am still
choosing to act based on what
message I'm communicating to
those I'm with.
Then in ten thirty one through
eleven one, whether then you eat
or drink or whatever you do, do
all to the glory of God.
Give no offense either to Jews
or to Greeks or to the Church of
God, just as I also please all
men in all things, not seeking
my own profit, but the profit of
the many, so that they may be
saved.
Be imitators of me just as I
also am of Christ.
The sophisticated Corinthians
pride themselves on being
theologically hip.
They know there are no idols,
but they like to be edgy and
partake of the temple meals, and
maybe they're secretly wanting
to continue a little bit of
their Pagan practices, or maybe
they just want to be part of the
sophisticated, beautiful people
in town.
In either case, their actions
are not being done to the glory
of God.
They're not stopping to think
about how their actions are
being interpreted by others or
what message they're sending.
And they're not stopping to
consider the fact that they're
sending the message you can
follow Jesus and worship these
other pagan gods.
No problem here mixing up these
religions.
And that's a message they ought
not to be sending.
And as they push immature
believers to join them in
eating, they show how little
they value loving their
neighbor.
As they dabble in idolatry,
they show how little they value
God's exclusive claim on their
lives.
They are making God's claims
trivial in the way that they're
pushing their freedoms.
So knowing what's right and
wrong is not enough.
We have to consider what
message our actions communicate
to others, and we want that
message we communicate to be to
God's glory, to reflect his
values, like love my neighbor as
myself, to reflect his claims,
like he is a jealous god, and
you should worship no other
gods, and to reflect the fact
that we belong to him and no
other god.
And Paul says this is how I
live my life.
When I'm with Jews, I limit my
freedoms so that the Jews will
not think I'm an evildoer.
When I'm with Gentiles, I
participate in practices so that
they hear the gospel and know
they don't need to earn their
salvation by keeping the law.
When I'm with immature
believers, I make sure I don't
push them to do what they
believe is wrong, but when they
have confused or misunderstood
the gospel, I speak the truth in
love.
As Christ did not serve
himself, but served us, so I,
Paul, seek not to serve myself,
but to serve others, and you do
likewise.
Let me make some closing
comments on this section.
First, this admonition to flee
idolatry is very relevant to us
today, even though you probably
don't have a pagan temple in
your neighborhood.
The key of idolatry is giving
God a competitor.
Idolatry is looking to find
life and blessing from some
source other than God.
There is no other power,
person, or thing that will grant
me life and blessing.
I'm not gonna find life and
belonging to the in crowd in
beauty and health and wealth and
fame in prestige, in resume
stars.
We get caught up in all those
things and we think that's where
I'm really gonna find success
and fulfillment and happiness,
but it's just not true.
I can participate in the good
gifts of this world because the
earth is the Lord and everything
in it.
But I have to put first things
first.
I have to get right with God
and understand what He wants for
me.
We live in a world filled with
competitors to God that tempt us
to believe we have to deal with
them and satisfy them and not
God.
They may not be pagan temples,
but they tempt us to the same
kind of idolatry, and that's the
kind of thing Paul is saying
flee.
Second, let's talk about this
idea of fellowship, of belonging
to a community.
God said he's calling a people
for himself.
Jesus talked about calling his
people.
Paul tells us we are part of
Christ's body.
The two greatest commandments
are love the Lord your God with
all your heart, mind, and soul,
and love your neighbor as
yourself.
There's a group of people that
God is calling together to
inherit eternal life, and the
fact that I am part of that
group, or not part of it, is
significant.
The Lord's Supper symbolizes
that I am part of that group.
When I partake of that meal,
I'm saying I want to be saved by
the blood of Christ, but it's a
communal meal.
It's meant to be enjoyed
together, and we are also saying
we're on this journey together.
We together hope in the life of
Christ.
Over and over again, the New
Testament says loving God means
loving the things of God, and
that includes loving God's
people.
So we ought to think about what
our actions are saying to
people.
What does it look like both to
the world and to immature
believers and make sure that
we're communicating the right
message?
Finally, let's go back to this
idea of a stumbling block.
In our culture today, people
think that they have the right
not to be offended.
And it's getting a little out
of hand, I think.
But Paul is not concerned that
I never do anything that offends
someone else.
Sometimes you have to be
offensive to stand up for the
gospel.
The idea he's communicating is
that you have to consider the
welfare of the other person,
that I want to communicate the
right message.
And sometimes the right message
is offensive because the world
will find the gospel offensive,
but we still need to act in a
way that communicates the gospel
and what is true.
If someone thinks a particular
practice is wrong or evil and I
urge them participate, then I'm
confusing the gospel.
I'm communicating that the
gospel includes pursuing evil or
mixing in idolatry.
So the guiding principle is not
am I being offensive?
Because sometimes you're gonna
have to be offensive.
The guiding principle is what
message am I communicating and
is it the truth of the gospel?
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
My mission is to teach you both
what the Bible means and how we
know.
I really appreciate you
listening, and I have three
favors to ask.
Subscribe to the podcast, leave
a positive rating or review
wherever you listen to your
podcast, and tell a friend.
And if you can only do one of
those things, telling a friend
is best.
I don't accept any advertising
on my website, nor do I ask for
donations, but it does encourage
me to hear from you about what
you've learned.
So please send me an email or a
comment or a question and leave
a positive rating on your
favorite podcast platform.
To find out more or hear
previous episodes, go to
wednesdayintheword.com.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by Reggie Coates of
Heartfeltmusic.org.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you next week at Wednesday
in the Word.