Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Welcome back to
Wednesday in the Word.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
We're gonna look at 1
Corinthians chapter 12, verses
11 through 13 today, and this is
the 37th talk in our series on
1 Corinthians.
Lecture notes for today's talk
are on the link below the
podcast so you don't have to
take notes.
And you can also find those
lecture notes on my website.
Just go to
wednesdayintheword.com slash 1
Corinthians 3 7.
And on the website, you'll find
lots of helpful information
about how to improve your Bible
study.
There's no charge, no spam, no
ads, only Bible study.
Thanks so much for listening.
We're continuing in chapter 12
of 1 Corinthians today, and in
this section, which begins in
chapter 12 and runs through 14,
Paul is addressing a problem in
the church in Corinth involving
manifestations of the Spirit.
And you'll recall this letter
is a response to both a verbal
report Paul has received about
what's happening in Corinth, and
it's also a response to a
letter that they have written to
him containing specific
questions.
And these questions are not
academic philosophy, rather they
relate to actual problems that
are going on in the Corinthian
church.
It's not that the Corinthians
are kind of randomly debating
the value of meat sacrifice to
idols or the nature of spiritual
gifts.
These are issues that are
causing disagreements and
divisions in their church, and
they've written to Paul for
help.
The problem that Paul started
addressing in 1201 is that there
is a group in Corinth that
strongly emphasizes speaking in
tongues.
They're influenced by their
pagan background where they were
used to seeing trances and
ecstatic expressions of idol
worship, and so they brought
that into Christianity and they
think that if you have something
obviously visible like speaking
in tongues, so if the spirit
has obviously come upon you in
such a way that you speak in
tongues, then that's the mark of
spiritual maturity.
You have the spirit clearly
because we can see it in this
expression of tongues.
And therefore, those who
haven't spoken in tongues who
don't have that visible
manifestation of the spirit,
well, they're lacking.
And they look it around and
they go, Well, that guy's
clearly speaking in tongues, so
God is clearly working through
him, but that other guy over
there, well, we're not so sure
he should be here at all.
And in response to that, Paul's
first point was that the mark
of the Spirit of God at work in
someone's life is not what kind
of ecstatic outward experience
they have.
The mark of the Spirit of God
at work in someone's life is
that they will say and mean in a
profound way that Jesus is
Lord.
That's the spiritual person.
The spiritual person is the one
who embraces and follows
Christ.
The person who is not spiritual
will reject Christ.
So Paul basically started this
by saying, You want to know what
the mark of true spirituality
is?
That's it.
The mark of God at work in
someone's life is that that
person will say and mean Jesus
is Lord.
So you can tell if someone is
spiritual or not by what comes
out of their mouth, but it's not
tongues, it's the fact that
they can say and mean Jesus is
Lord.
Then Paul begins contrasting
unity and diversity.
So he begins contrasting what
is the same about all us
believers and what is different,
what has variety.
And his second point was that
all God's people have the same
spirit.
Everyone who belongs to Christ
has the same spirit of God at
work in them.
But that same spirit gives a
variety of differing gifts to
different people.
Now, why is that important to
the Corinthians?
Because some of the Corinthians
are saying, well, look, if you
lack a particular gift, if you
lack speaking in tongues, then
you aren't a spiritual person.
And Paul is saying, no, you
have that wrong.
It is God's intention to
distribute different gifts to
different people.
So God's purpose and plan is to
make us different.
And this is the way God is
working among his people.
You should expect to see
genuine believers without
specific gifts.
So if I see a person who lacks
tongues, that shouldn't surprise
me because it's God's intention
to design and gift us
differently.
So the Corinthians who are
saying, well, that person isn't
spiritual because he's never
spoken in tongues, he lacks that
particular manifestation of the
spirit, they have misunderstood
what God is doing in the
church.
God intends to create diversity
among his people.
He gives a variety of gifts
through the same spirit.
And in the last podcast, I
argued that we should think of
spiritual gifts as roles and
opportunities to serve the body
of Christ rather than as a kind
of superpower.
And that Paul's purpose in this
section is not to give a
catalog of gifts so that you can
figure out what gift you have,
but to say this one and the same
spirit does a variety of
things.
And here's a few examples of
some of the many, many ways he
will work.
And I contrasted the modern
notion of spiritual gifts as
kind of supernatural talents
with what I think Paul is
teaching here, and that is that
they are opportunities to serve
the kingdom.
They are roles we play.
And so if I have the gift of
teaching, the gift is not a
superpower to teach, the gift is
the opportunity to teach it
all.
In the modern view, spiritual
gifts are kind of God-given
supernatural abilities that come
from a fixed list, and each
believer is given a particular
gift or a set of gifts upon
conversion, and it's our job to
discover which gifts we have and
to use them.
And in this modern view, the
gifts limit what the Holy Spirit
might call you to do.
I think as we go through this
chapter that spiritual gifts
should be understood more as
opportunities, roles, or
responsibilities, and that these
are roles and responsibilities
God gives each believer that
we're privileged to play.
They're gifts in that they're
part of His grace to us.
But rather than a fixed list,
the gifts are potentially as
numerous as the number of
believers.
We are not limited by them in
any way, and what we do can vary
and change with the seasons of
our lives.
I think this is a better
understanding of the metaphor of
the body that Paul's going to
go on to use in this chapter,
and that's what we're going to
look at today.
So he just said in twelve
eleven, but one and the same
spirit works all these things,
distributing to each one
individually just as he wills.
And I argued that this is the
heart of the point he's making.
One and the same spirit works
all these things.
The variety that we see amongst
the people of God is by design.
It's not a defect.
Each person is given a
different role to play in the
body of Christ on purpose.
And now Paul's going to explain
that with the metaphor.
So picking up in verse twelve
for just as the body is one and
has many members, and all the
members of the body, though many
are one body, so it is with
Christ.
For in one spirit we were all
baptized into one body, Jews or
Greeks, slaves are free, and all
were made to drink of one
spirit.
For the body does not consist
of one member but of many.
So Paul's making this analogy.
Just as in the human body we it
functions this way, so also are
the people who belong to
Christ.
Now we have to be careful here
because we are very used to
talking about the body of Christ
today.
It is modern Christian jargon
or terminology for us.
And if you've been around the
church much, you're probably
familiar with this language.
And as soon as we see the body
of Christ or this analogy of the
body, we start filling in the
gaps with our pre understanding.
And in studying this section,
we want to be patient and let
Paul make his point first.
Paul is saying just as the
human body is made up of lots of
different parts and pieces, so
also are the people who belong
to Christ.
And we want to be careful, slow
down, read through this in
context and think about the
point he's making without
jumping to our pre
understanding.
And it's hard to do, but it's
worth it.
So my body is a unified whole
made up of many different parts
with different functions.
My eye plays one role, my
finger plays a role, my heart
plays a role, but you put it all
together and it's me.
My body is one unified entity
made up of lots of different
parts that play different roles.
So there are a variety of
members of my body, but together
they form this unified whole.
So the body is a picture of
unity in diversity.
I am one unified body made up
of different parts that do
different things.
By God's design, the human body
is meant to be a coherent whole
made up of different parts, and
Paul's saying, so it is with
the Church of Christ.
Christ has saved and redeemed
and gathered together his
people.
Together we're one unified
whole, but we are made up of
individuals who play different
roles and have different
functions just like the parts of
the body.
And it's not just each local
church, but all the people who
have believed throughout
history.
We have all had a role to play
in the story and the drama of
redemption, and each of us plays
a different role.
Just as it's God's purpose for
different parts of the body to
play different roles and have
different functions in the body,
it is God's purpose throughout
history for different people to
play different roles in the
story of redemption.
The Spirit of God works his
will for the church through
various people in various ways.
And Paul's saying, You
Corinthians are judging each
other as if everybody should
look the same.
You think that those who are
different are lesser Christians
or maybe not spiritual at all,
and you're saying, Well, I have
the gift of tongues and you
don't, I'm somehow superior to
you because we should all look
the same and you're lacking.
And Paul's saying, No, that's
not the right perspective.
Just like the human body has
diversity to it, so the body of
Christ has diversity to it, and
that diversity is by God's
design.
Paul gives a one sentence
summary of the source of our
unity.
This is twelve thirteen.
For by one spirit we were all
baptized into one body, whether
Jews or Greeks, whether slaves
are free, and we were all made
to drink of one spirit.
I think this is a very
important statement in the
argument Paul's making here, but
it's easy to misunderstand.
First he uses the word baptism,
and our temptation is to take
that literally as if it's
referring to the physical act of
baptism.
But I think in the context it's
clear he's speaking
metaphorically, and actual
physical baptism is not in view.
He makes two analogies here.
There's a baptism in one spirit
and a drinking in one spirit.
Now we don't have a ritual
where we drink the spirit, so
it's not going through these two
rituals that makes us
Christians.
He's speaking metaphorically.
But some people have taken this
language of baptized by one
spirit and made it a technical
term, which I think is a
mistake.
Some people understand this
language of baptism in one
spirit as a kind of second
blessing where after you've been
baptized with water, you need a
second baptism in the spirit
where you speak in tongues.
But I don't think that fits the
context.
Paul has just said that the
Spirit does not give everyone
the same role to play in the
body of Christ.
The Spirit gives different
opportunities to serve to
different people on purpose as
part of God's plan.
So having said that tongues is
one of those gifts that some
people get and some people
don't, I don't think he would
then turn around and argue, oh,
and by the way, you need a
second blessing where everyone
gets tongues.
That would conflict with the
point he just made.
His whole point is that some
people speak in tongues, but
everyone is baptized in the
spirit.
Now both these analogies
involve water.
Baptism is a ritual that
involves symbolically cleansing
with water.
Similarly, when I'm thirsty, I
quench my thirst with water.
Where does this language come
from?
Why would Paul pick these two
analogies to describe his point
this way?
Both of these metaphors come
from the Gospels.
All of the Gospels report that
John the Baptist says, I baptize
you with water, but there's one
coming after me who will
baptize you with the Spirit.
So John is saying, I baptize,
and the medium of my baptism is
water, but there is another who
is coming, and the medium of his
baptism is going to be the Holy
Spirit.
This is Matthew three verse
eleven.
As for me, this is John the
Baptist speaking, as for me I
baptize you with water for
repentance, but he who is coming
after me is mightier than I,
and I am not fit to remove his
sandals.
He will baptize you with the
Holy Spirit and fire.
And we also find that in Mark
one eight, Luke three sixteen,
and John one twenty six.
Likewise, the Gospel of John
records two places where Jesus
says, If you're thirsty, come to
me and I will give you living
water.
In one case Jesus is speaking
to the woman at the well and we
find that account in John four.
The other is in John seven, and
there it's explained that the
metaphor of living water is a
description of the Spirit.
So this is John seven, verses
thirty seven through thirty
nine.
Now on the last day, the great
day of the feast, Jesus stood
and cried out, saying, If anyone
is thirsty, let him come to me
to drink.
He who believes in me, as the
scripture said, from his
innermost being will flow rivers
of living water.
That's the end of the quote,
and then John explains, but this
he spoke of the Spirit, whom
those who believed in him were
to receive, for the Spirit was
not yet given because Jesus was
not yet glorified.
It seems likely that Paul is
borrowing this language he uses
from the words of John the
Baptist and the words of Jesus.
Baptism is an outward cleansing
with water that symbolizes
conversion and becoming a
disciple of someone.
The true baptism is the baptism
of the Spirit, where the Spirit
cleanses our hard hearts and
truly makes us people who want
to follow Christ.
It is an inside washing and
transformation of which the
outward symbol of water baptism
is a sign.
When we're physically thirsty,
we drink water to quench our
thirst, but the true drink is
water of the Spirit, which works
inside us to quench our
spiritual thirst.
So the reality behind this is
the same idea he introduced in
the first verses of the
chapters.
No one can say that Jesus is
Lord except by the Spirit
working in him to give him faith
and understanding.
The Spirit cleanses us of our
hostility to God.
The Spirit enlightens us and
gives us understanding of truth.
The Spirit gives us the courage
to persevere in the faith.
That's the work of the Spirit
in the lives of believers.
We belong to Christ because of
the work of the Spirit.
We see our need for Christ
because the Spirit has been at
work in us to give us the eyes
to see it.
We persevere in the faith
through trials because of the
work of the Spirit giving us
that strong, mature faith.
We are, in a sense, a
miraculous work of the Spirit in
progress.
So in that sense, we have been
washed by the Spirit of God and
we drink the Spirit of God.
That's the basis for our unity
because each of us believers
received the same spirit.
All of us were washed by the
same spirit.
All of us quench our spiritual
thirst with the same spirit.
The miraculous work of the
spirit has made us one people,
one community.
So in this section, Paul is
highlighting two ways the Spirit
works, and I think it's
important for us to see the
difference.
One is how the Spirit works the
same in all of us, and one is
how the Spirit works differently
in all of us.
On the one hand, the Spirit
gives us all the same faith, the
same spiritual awakening, the
same perseverance in the faith,
and the same desire to follow
Jesus.
On the other hand, the spirit
gives us very different roles to
play in the body of Christ.
We have different functions.
Like different parts of the
body have different jobs to
fulfill to keep the body
healthy, so we believers have
different jobs to fulfill in the
history of God's people to
bring about His glory and His
purposes.
These roles we have revolve
around service to each other.
Their purpose is to be
beneficial to the people of God,
like the purpose of the various
parts of the body are to
benefit the health and welfare
of the body.
In this life, all of us
believers are on a journey of
faith where we move from
childhood to maturity, from
immaturity to wisdom and
understanding.
And God has graciously given us
fellow travelers to help each
other on that journey.
We are to encourage each other,
to remind each other of what's
true, and to manifest the love
of God in various ways to each
other.
So through this list he's just
given us, he's been saying,
look, one speaks wisdom so that
others may grow and be corrected
in their understanding.
Another works miracles of
healing, partly as a sign of
God's power in the world, and
also to benefit the one who's
sick.
One serves another who is in
need.
Maybe it's through monetary
support or practical support or
just a word of encouragement.
One can speak a word of truth
to another who needs
encouragement.
If you're not interested in
serving your fellow believers,
then you're really not
interested in spiritual gifts
because that's what they're for.
We are intended to help and
encourage and build each other
up in the faith, just like the
body pieces and parts work
together.
God has given us various
opportunities through the
workings of His Spirit so that
we can be of help to each other.
You may be the right person at
the right moment to speak a word
of wisdom to another.
You may be the friend who's
there at the right time to offer
a shoulder to cry on, or the
helper who sees another in need
and steps in.
It is God's intention and
design that these gifts vary.
So it's entirely inappropriate
to judge someone else's
spirituality by what gifts that
person has or does not have.
The person who speaks in
tongues is no more or less
spiritual than the person who's
hospitable.
Now that leaves us with this
question of what is the gift of
tongues and what is the gift of
healing and where do they fit in
the church today?
Should I be worried if no one
in my local church has healed
anyone?
I mentioned this briefly in the
last podcast, but I want to
give it a little bit more space.
First, as I said last time, we
have to realize that Paul has
not answered those questions,
and it is really not his
intention in this passage to
answer them.
He says there are miracles of
healing, but he does not say
that every local church
throughout history will have
someone who can miraculously
heal.
From the New Testament, We know
that there are workings of the
Spirit where at times people are
inexplicably healed.
Jesus healed many people, Paul
healed people, Peter healed
people.
Actually, I think all of the
apostles miraculously healed
people at times.
And we do have stories today
that this same kind of
miraculous healing is happening
in various places and has
happened at other times
throughout history.
From what Paul has said here, I
think we can conclude that if
God wants that to happen at a
particular point in history to
any particular person for some
reason of his own, then the
Spirit of God will make it
happen.
If that kind of activity is not
happening now and we don't see
it, then I would conclude that
too is part of God's plan.
Because as Paul has said, the
gifts are diverse.
Miracles, healing, and tongues
are gifts of the Spirit
variously given to various
people at various times in
history.
Paul has not really answered
our modern questions about what
should we expect to see today.
All we know from what he has
said is that there are gifts and
they are various and they are
different, and we should expect
to see diversity.
So that leads me to conclude
that these gifts will vary and
therefore we may or may not see
them in our local churches, but
that if and when we need to see
them for God to accomplish his
purposes and plans, then we
will.
Now I do want to be clear that
I am not criticizing certain
wings of the charismatic
movement that we see today.
From what we've studied so far,
I would say Paul has not said
anything that rules the modern
phenomenon of tongues in or
rules it out.
But what we can say about the
charismatic movement is that if
their understanding is that
everyone ought to speak in
tongues, and if their theology
is if you're not speaking in
tongues, you're not spiritual,
you're a lesser Christian, then
I would say that's a mistake.
If that's your theology, then I
would say you have
misunderstood because Paul seems
to be clearly saying that's the
wrong perspective.
Paul has just argued that the
gifts are diverse and you cannot
judge someone's spirituality by
whether or not they have the
gift of tongues.
So I would argue it's
inappropriate to suggest that
any particular gift ought to be
happening in every single
believer's life.
That's the point Paul's making.
Gifted teachers are no more
spiritual than those gifted at
mercy.
Prophets are no more spiritual
than those who are hospitable
and so forth.
God gives different roles and
different functions to different
people on purpose to carry out
his plan of redemption and to
glorify his name.
Okay, so what exactly was going
on in Corinth that involves
tongues?
Well the details are tricky and
it has led to a divide in the
American Church.
We have the charismatic camp
and the non-charismatic camp,
and both sides point to 1
Corinthians twelve to bolster
their case.
And these chapters twelve
through fourteen are a key part
in the debate.
There is a sense in which I
think both sides could
peacefully and gracefully
coexist and agree to disagree,
but there's a hitch.
Both sides tend to see the
other side as deficient and
missing out.
So charismatics tend to see
non-charismatics as missing out.
They would say God is offering
us power, some sort of success
and emotional exaltation, and
you're missing it.
You're living a second best
Christian life.
So the charismatics see the
other side as being too
intellectual, selling God short,
settling for a lesser Christian
experience, and missing out on
the fullness of what God has to
offer.
On the other side,
non-charismatics tend to see the
charismatics as following a
fairy tale.
Non charismatics tend to view
the charismatics as believing
something that's not really
happening.
They think the tongues and
prophecy of today are largely
human fabrication, and they
think charismatics are gullible
and focused on the wrong things.
And I suspect all of us know
someone on the other side of the
debate.
Churches have split over this
issue, friendships break up
because it of it, so how are we
to live together?
Well, here's what I think Paul
has clearly said so far.
One, the mark of true
spirituality is not having a
particular spiritual gift or
role to play, including speaking
in tongues, but rather the mark
of true spirituality is that
you can say and mean that Jesus
is Lord.
Second, Jesus brought us
together to be his people and to
belong to each other as his
family.
Third, God gives every
individual believer a role to
play in the body of Christ and
in bringing about his kingdom.
Fourth, it is wrong to judge
people based on whether they
have a particular gift or a
particular role to play, so it's
wrong to judge them based on
what role they have been given
or not given.
And five, the purpose of having
these roles or these gifts is
to build each other up in the
faith.
Now I know people who have a
charismatic practice who have
that perspective that I just
outlined.
They put the important things
first and their lives fit with
that perspective I just
described.
So while we disagree on certain
points, I think we agree on
what's most important.
We're both trying to be
submissive to what the Bible is
calling us as believers to do
and to think and believe.
I know other people with
charismatic practices and people
with non-charismatic practices
who seem to violate some of
these principles.
They seem to put the least
important things first and they
seem to judge and grade each
other by the wrong standards.
I don't think the Bible says
one way or other whether God
intends to keep acting in
miraculous ways.
It does not tell us whether the
New Testament was a unique
period of church history or the
beginning of some new way of
working.
Now we do have some clues.
One of them is that the
miraculous signs were typically
given to verify and confirm that
the apostle or the prophet or
the teacher was genuinely
speaking for God and that Jesus
was in fact the Messiah.
So we know that God gave the
ability to perform miracles and
healings to Jesus and the
apostles to say, You will know
that these people are speaking
the truth because of these
signs.
We also know that God
distributes various gifts as he
wills and that he intends to
give different gifts to
different people at different
times in history.
Now I don't think there are
apostles today, although some
would disagree with me.
So I would tend to think that
we're not typically going to see
these kinds of sign gifts, the
miracles, healings, and speaking
in tongues, because we don't
need that kind of apostolic
confirmation or the confirming
sign that this person has the
authority to speak for God.
The author of Hebrews says in,
I think it's two, three, and
four, that God testifies to the
truth of the apostle's message
by the signs and wonders and
miracles.
So the signs were a testimony
that God was behind these
people.
Now that doesn't explicitly say
that when the New Testament
period is over, there will be no
more signs, but it does imply
that that is part of their
purpose.
The apostles had a unique
authority that no other Bible
teachers have.
Their authority and their
message needed to be confirmed
and validated because of that
authority.
My message doesn't need
validating by signs because I
have no authority.
Now we know that God does not
value chaos and gullibility, and
we know that he can act however
he wants to act in history and
that he can distribute the gifts
as he wills.
So I think we ought to be
prepared to believe in the power
and miracles of God.
We don't want to be like the
Pharisees who reject Jesus when
he's standing right in front of
them because they think
supernatural things can happen.
On the other hand, we don't
want to be gullible and chaotic.
So all that is to say God can
do and does do what he wants,
and I'm not sure he's ruled it
in or out.
What exactly were tongues?
Well, again, that's debatable.
There are two main ideas.
The Greek word simply means
languages.
To speak in tongues is
literally to speak in languages,
just like we talk about our
mother tongue.
It just means language.
The story of Pentecost in Acts
2 makes it pretty clear that the
people involved were speaking
actual real languages.
These people were inspired by
the Spirit to speak out in
praise of God, and they were
speaking in a language that was
not their own, but that language
was understood by the people
listening.
There are two other places
where we see that happening
again in Acts 10 and in Acts 19,
and in both those places the
gospel is going to a new group
of people.
So in those other two places,
we see the same phenomenon that
we see on Pentecost, that it is
a confirmation that yes, God is
at work here too, and that
people are speaking languages
that are not their native
language, but they are
understandable by the persons or
the people listening.
So while Acts seems to give
this coherent picture that
people speak in actual languages
they don't know, it's not clear
that if the people speaking
knew what they're saying.
So in Pentecost or in the Acts
chapter ten and nineteen, is it
that I set out to say something
in English but it comes out in
French?
Or is it that I just start
speaking and it sounds like
babbling to me and I have no
idea what I'm saying, but the
French person next to me
understands.
Well, Acts doesn't say, but
given what Paul says about God
being orderly in chapter 14 that
we're gonna look at coming up,
I suspect that they knew what
they're saying.
If all we had was Acts, the
picture I think would be clear.
Because in Scripture we really
only have these chapters in 1
Corinthians and then we have
Acts.
But then we have what we see in
the modern church today, which
is often called glossolia.
And not only in the Christian
church, we see it in a number of
different religions.
Non-believers seem to be able
to do this thing we call
glossolalia, and it is not
distinguishable from what
believers are doing.
So that practice, glossolia, is
the practice of speaking in a
language that no one hearing
understands, and usually the
person speaking doesn't
understand either.
It's an ecstatic outburst, and
the idea is that this experience
is beyond words, it's beyond
human language, and it comes out
in this kind of babbling
language that no one
understands.
Now some people claim that the
practice of glossolalia is what
we see in Acts, but I think Acts
makes it clear that the
speakers there were speaking
regular known human languages.
Then in a passage coming up
we're going to look at in 1
Corinthians 13, Paul talks about
speaking in the tongues of men
or the tongues of angels.
And some people claim that
glossolalia are the languages of
angels, and that's why we don't
understand them.
Paul could mean that, but as
we'll see when we get there, I
think that section follows a
pattern.
Paul says something and then he
pushes it to exaggeration.
So I think this tongues of
angels is that kind of
exaggeration, even if I speak in
the tongues of angels.
Not that anyone actually does
speak in that, but even if I did
do that and I didn't have love,
then I would have nothing.
So the Corinthians could be
speaking in the tongues of
angels.
That's an option, but I not the
one that persuades me.
It could be that the
Corinthians believe that they're
speaking in the tongues of
angels, and Paul's saying, even
if you were, it's useless
without love.
So he doesn't think they are
speaking in the tongues of
angels, but even so, here's the
rub.
Or it could be that he's just
saying, let me push this to the
point of exaggeration to make my
point, which is what I think is
going on.
I think that the gift Paul is
talking about is the Acts kind
of speaking in a foreign
language.
I suspect that the Corinthians
are practicing something like
Glossolalia or something closer
to it, and they are calling it
what we see in Acts.
And in either case, as we get
into chapter 14, Paul's gonna
say, if there is no actual
content in what you're saying,
then you need to be quiet.
So someone needs to be able to
translate.
If you speak and it comes out
in German, and there's someone
there who knows German and can
translate, okay, but if no one
is there who can understand what
you're saying and you don't
understand what you're saying,
then you need to keep quiet and
refrain from speaking in public.
So we're gonna get to that, but
all of that suggests to me that
you ought to know what you're
saying.
So I think what was going on in
Acts is this practice of
speaking in a language that you
weren't officially taught.
I think probably what's
happening in the Corinthian
church is it's some kind of
incoherent babbling that no one
understands, and Paul is going
to rule that out because it
lacks content that edifies the
entire body.
And whatever perspective you
take on this passage and on what
tongues means and what it means
today, I think we need to
refrain from judging each other
and grading each other on their
our spirituality, because that
seems to be Paul's main point.
God gives people different
gifts on purpose, and it is not
our place to judge each other by
them.
So, one final comment about the
unity of the spirit.
It's easy to lose sight of the
fact that how the spirit works
in all of us is extremely
important.
We get so caught up in the
question of what's my gift, what
are my gifts, what roles do I
have to play in the body, that
we forget that the supremely
important gift of the spirit is
the gift of saving faith.
That working of the spirit that
allows me to say, Jesus is
Lord, that's what determines my
eternal destiny.
That working of the Spirit is
the difference between being
part of the people of God and
not being part of the people of
God.
And that working of the Spirit
makes the difference between me
being lost and without hope, and
me being forgiven and
profoundly hopeful.
This is the salvation Jesus
brought us with his death.
This is what makes us one.
If I'm a believer, the Holy
Spirit has done that for me.
If you're a believer, the Holy
Spirit has done that for you.
The Holy Spirit is the water
that washes us and makes us the
people of Christ.
The Holy Spirit is the water we
drink that quenches our thirst
for righteousness and holiness
and forgiveness.
The Holy Spirit is what makes
the difference between those
headed for destruction and
judgment and those headed for
life.
And this is the work of the
Spirit that determines how we
think about each other.
The world in Corinthians are
judging and rejecting each other
based on whether or not they
speak in tongues.
And Paul's saying that's the
wrong perspective.
The dividing line is not
whether or not you speak in
tongues, the dividing line is
whether or not you understand
that Jesus is Lord.
And if you understand that
Jesus is Lord, it's because the
Spirit of God is at work in you.
And that makes us one body
together.
When I see faith that
perseveres through trials, when
we see hope in the midst of
difficult circumstances, when we
see grief and repentance over
sinfulness, we are seeing the
work of the Spirit, and that is
the one work of the Spirit that
God gives to everyone.
We're not just a club of people
with a religious hobby.
There's a sense in which a
local church gathering is a room
full of miracles, because we
are a people who are being
turned away from rebellion and
hostility toward God and toward
faith and holiness.
That's an incredible miracle of
God, and that is the one
miracle that happens in all of
God's people, and it is the
thing that makes us one.
We are in this together because
the Spirit of God is working in
us.
Church can seem so mundane, you
know, we're just meeting here
again, yet another Sunday,
singing the same old songs,
saying the same prayers, no one
may get healed, no one may speak
in tongues, but from Paul's
perspective, there's a really
big miracle happening in that
local church gathering.
Rebel sinners are turning to
faith in God because of Christ
through the work of the Spirit.
And Paul is challenging the
Corinthians, why are you
complaining that someone in that
gathering is not speaking in
tongues when that person is
turning from darkness to life?
How can you prefer that his
mouth be babbling some
incomprehensible language when
his mouth is speaking faith and
wisdom?
And faith is the really
important gift.
Thank you for listening to
Wednesday in the Word, the
podcast that explains not only
what a passage means, but shows
you how to figure it out.
I really appreciate you
listening in, and I have three
favors to ask.
Please subscribe to the
podcast, leave a positive rating
or review wherever you listen
to your podcast, and tell a
friend.
And if you can only do one
thing, telling a friend is best.
You can find Wednesday in the
Word on Google Podcasts, Apple
Podcasts, Spotify TuneI,
Stitcher, iHeartRadio, Overcast,
Pocket Cast, and just about
anywhere you can get your
podcasts.org.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you next week at Wednesday
in the Word.