Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Welcome back to
Wednesday in the Word.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
We are studying 1 Corinthians
12, verses 1 through 3 today.
This is the 35th talk in our
series on 1 Corinthians.
You can find lecture notes for
today's talk on the link below
the podcast so you don't have to
take notes.
And you can also find them on
my website.
Just go to
wednesdayintheword.com slash 1
Corinthians 3.5.
And while you're on the
website, you'll find lots of
helpful information to improve
your Bible study.
There's no charge, no spam, no
ads, just Bible study.
Glad to have you along.
Well, we're starting a new
section today.
Paul is still addressing topics
related to how the Corinthians
are handling themselves when
they meet together.
He's done with the Lord's
Supper, and now he's turning to
the topic of spiritual gifts.
Chapters 12 through 14 of 1
Corinthians function as one
unit, but within that unit he
makes several distinct
arguments.
His thought moves in units or
subpoints, and we're going to
look at one unit of thought each
week.
Today we're only going to look
at the first three verses of
chapter twelve.
This is the foundation for his
argument, and I want to make
sure we understand it because
everything he's going to say to
from now till the end of
fourteen depends on these three
verses.
Let me go ahead and read them
for us.
This is first Corinthians
chapter twelve verses one
through three.
Now concerning spiritual gifts,
brethren, I do not want you to
be unaware.
You know that when you were
pagans you were led astray to
the mute idols, however you were
led.
Therefore I make known to you
that no one speaking by the
Spirit of God says Jesus is
accursed, and no one can say
Jesus is Lord except by the Holy
Spirit.
In twelve one he starts out now
concerning spiritual gifts or
manifestations of the Spirit,
and this phrase now concerning
is the marker we've seen since
chapter five that signals that
Paul is about to address a new
topic.
You'll recall that this letter
is a response to a verbal report
Paul has received about what's
happening in the church in
Corinth, and it's also a
response to a letter they have
written to him in which they
asked him specific questions.
And these questions are not
academic philosophy, rather,
they relate to actual problems
that the church is having.
So it's not like they're
randomly debating the value of
meat sacrifice to idols or the
nature of spiritual gifts.
These issues are causing
disagreements and divisions
within their church, and they've
written to Paul for help.
The first question we want to
ask as Bible students today is
what question did the
Corinthians ask Paul?
What is it that he's about to
address?
And as we've seen in previous
sections, how you understand the
question influences what you
think Paul's saying in the
answer.
For example, one commentary I
looked at argued that Paul was
asked these questions, and I'm
quoting.
Does every believer have them?
How can believers know which
gifts they have?
How important are they to the
individual and to the life of
the church?
What is the baptism of the Holy
Spirit and how does it relate
to spiritual gifts?
Are all of the gifts given in
every age of church history, or
were some given only during a
certain time period?
Can the gifts be counterfeited?
If so, how can believers tell
the true gifts from the false
gifts?
Well, while those are
interesting questions that we
might have today, it's really
hard to see how the Corinthians
would have asked those questions
of Paul.
And if we start there, we will
very likely miss Paul's point
and come away with answers that
Paul never intended.
And I'm gonna argue that that
list of questions does not
describe what this passage is
all about.
And as we go through the
various sections, I'm gonna
argue that the question that the
Corinthians asked came from
this situation, and this comes
from studying twelve through
fourteen as a unit.
Here's what I think was going
on.
In Corinth, there is a group
that strongly emphasizes
manifestations of the spirit,
and in particular, they are
infatuated with speaking in
tongues.
They think that if you have a
visible, obvious manifestation
of the spirit, like speaking in
tongues, that that is a surefire
guarantee that you are a
spiritual Christian and that the
spirit has come upon you and
that you're a believer.
That's the mark of spiritual
maturity.
You must have the spirit
because we can see it outwardly
in this expression of tongues.
Therefore, those who don't have
this visible manifestation of
the spirit are lacking.
We're not even sure if they're
spiritual or not.
And Paul is speaking to that
kind of situation.
He's speaking to a group of
believers who are grading and
judging each other by whether or
not they're speaking in
tongues.
And they're looking around and
they're saying, Well, God is
clearly working in those who
speak in tongues, but we're not
too sure about everybody else.
You guys who aren't speaking in
tongues, you better be worried.
And through the next chapters,
chapters 12 through 14, Paul's
going to make a series of points
to give them perspective on
that situation.
So if I had to sum all that up
in one question that he's
answering, it would be this Is
tongues a measure of true
spirituality?
And if not, what is true
spirituality?
Now that's a very important
question for us to understand,
and it's a very different
question from what are the gifts
and how do I know what I have.
Honestly, I don't think Paul
addresses those questions of
what are the gifts and how do I
know which one I have.
I don't think he addresses that
type of question at all.
But let's dive into this.
Let's read the first verse
again.
In 12.1, now concerning
spiritual gifts, brethren, I do
not want you to be unaware.
If you're reading the New
American Standard Version,
you'll notice that the word
gifts is in gray font.
And that means the word is not
in the original Greek text, but
it's been supplied or added by
the translators to fill out the
meaning.
The translators think it's
implied.
Literally 12.1 reads now
concerning spirituals.
And the word we have is just
the Greek word for spiritual in
the plural.
We have to supply the noun by
the context.
So it could be spiritual gifts,
it could be spiritual things,
it could be spiritual people or
something else.
And you could make a case to
translate this as spiritual
gifts, but I think that is kind
of misleading for us modern
Christians because we have an
entire theology about what the
term spiritual gifts means.
And when we see that phrase, we
read our pre-understanding into
it rather than letting the
context tell us what the
author's talking about.
So in modern Christianity, the
term spiritual gifts has become
a kind of technical term with a
very specific theology behind
it.
When we see spiritual gifts, we
immediately think of a
supernatural enabling or an
ability that God gives us to
serve Him in a particular way.
So like the gift of teaching,
the gift of evangelism, of
mercy, helps, or something like
that.
When we read the term spiritual
gifts in a verse, we
immediately assume that Paul is
talking about this supernatural
abilities or supernatural
enablings.
And in this case, I think that
starts us off on the wrong foot.
Interestingly, there is only
one place in the New Testament
where we actually see the phrase
spiritual gifts, and that's in
Romans 1.
Paul is telling the Romans that
he wants to visit Rome so that
he can impart a spiritual gift
to them.
And then he explains what he
means by spiritual gift.
He says he wants to encourage
them in the faith and be
encouraged by them as well.
So this is Romans 1, 11 and 12.
For I long to see you that I
may impart to you some spiritual
gift to strengthen you, that
is, that we may be mutually
encouraged by each other's
faith, both yours and mine.
So that is the one explicit
place in the New Testament where
we see the phrase spiritual
gift, and in that case, Paul is
not talking about spiritual
gifts in the way we talk about
it today.
The gift in Romans in that case
is a gift that Paul wants to
give to his readers, not a gift
the Holy Spirit is giving to
believers, and it's spiritual in
the sense that he wants to
encourage their faith as opposed
to give them a physical
present.
It's not a talent or an
enabling.
It's very clear in Romans that
Paul is not talking about
supernatural abilities that God
gives each believer.
Paul is clearly not saying I
want to come to Rome so that I
can give you the gift of mercy
or teaching or something like
that.
For us today the term spiritual
gift has developed a very
specific meaning, but in the
Bible that phrase was not used
that way at all, and that's
something we need to be aware of
as we study, and especially
when we come to a verse like
twelve one.
We want to be careful not to
read our modern understanding
into this section, and I would
argue that the commentator I
quoted earlier made exactly that
mistake in his list of
questions.
He took the term spiritual
gift, read in our modern
understanding of that term, and
then came up with a list of
questions based on our modern
idea.
Well as I read chapters twelve
to fourteen, I come up with a
very different picture of the
situation Paul is addressing.
And I think that situation
helps us figure out what Paul
means by spirituals or spiritual
things here in 12 1.
I would translate this
manifestations of the spirit.
I think the question on the
table is what is the mark of
being a spiritual person?
What do these manifestations of
the spirit, like tongues,
indicate about our spirituality?
So I don't think he's about to
address something like let me
explain spiritual gifts to you
so you can figure out which one
you have.
Rather, it's let's talk about
these manifestations of the
spirit so you can get the right
perspective on what they're all
about.
So now concerning spirituality
or now concerning manifestations
of the spirit, what does it
look like when the spirit makes
himself known in someone's life?
That's the question.
All right, let's add in twelve
two.
So this is twelve one and
twelve two.
Now concerning manifestations
of the spirit, brethren, I do
not want you to be unaware.
You know that when you were
pagans, you were led astray to
mute idols, however you were
led.
Twelve two is kind of tricky to
translate.
It's missing a verb, and the
word led astray is a bit
difficult to understand.
Fundamentally, it means to lead
away.
You would use this word to
describe taking a horse by the
bridle and leading it out to
pasture, or if you arrest
someone, you would use this word
to describe taking them off to
prison.
But it's got other nuances.
I think the basic idea here is
being carried away or losing
control to the god.
And we want to ask the question
then, why does Paul bring up
their pagan background and what
did they used to do before the
idols?
The Gentiles among the
Corinthians grew up going to
pagan temples, and their concept
of religion was formed in these
pagan temples.
In the pagan temples, the idols
were mute.
The idols themselves could not
speak as they're just statues
made by human hands.
But the priests and the
worshipers in the pagan temples
would speak mostly through
ecstatic experiences.
So they would rant and rave and
say things that were supposedly
the voice of the temple god.
In pagan worship, you became
possessed by the god.
You drank a bunch of wine, you
sniffed the incense, and you
danced yourself dizzy until you
lost control and the idol god
took control of you.
That's how an idol god
manifested itself in your life.
So for the Corinthians, what
does a spiritual person look
like in a pagan temple?
Well, the spiritual person is
the one who is speaking
ecstatically or babbling or
seems out of control.
And the Corinthians have
imported that concept into their
belief in Jesus.
They expect a similar kind of
phenomena to occur in the
Christian church.
And they look around and they
go, Well, what is like our pagan
experience?
Aha, it's speaking in tongues.
So the question on the table
is, is that true?
Are tongues really the mark of
being a spiritual person?
Because that's what we're used
to seeing in the temples.
And you know, tongues look a
little bit like the stuff we're
used to.
So that's what being a
spiritual person must mean,
right?
And if not, what is the nature
of spirituality?
Should we be given over to
these unusual and inexplicable
experiences or not?
And Paul is reminding them that
their idea of spirituality was
formed by their experiences of
going before the mute pagan
idols and being carried away.
They were led away supposedly
by the idol god and they had
these ecstatic experiences.
And now they've become
Christians, they've turned away
from the idols, but they still
have this idea that worship is
all about these ecstatic
emotional experiences and being
carried off by the Spirit.
So they still think the way you
can tell that a person is truly
spiritual, has truly been taken
over by the Holy Spirit, is
this outward manifestation of
speaking in tongues.
Paul's reminding them that
their pagan background gives
them this perspective on what
spirituality is all about.
Because pagan worship is all
about being carried off in an
ecstatic experience by an idol,
speaking in tongues looks to
them like the height of
spirituality.
It's kind of familiar.
So they've concluded, we know
how we can tell if someone's
truly spiritual.
We know because the Holy Spirit
has taken over their mouth and
is giving them the supernatural
speech.
So what's wrong with that group
over there who doesn't speak in
tongues?
They must not be truly
spiritual because we know from
our pagan background this is
what spirituality looks like.
And Paul's reminding them of
their background so that he can
go back and correct their
perspective.
He says, Remember what you used
to do when you were pagans.
Now let me tell you what the
true mark of spirituality is.
Let's add in verse three.
Now concerning manifestations
of the Spirit, brethren, I do
not want you to be unaware.
You know that when you were
pagans you were led astray to
mute idols, however you were
led.
Therefore, I make known to you
that no one speaking by the
Spirit of God says Jesus is
accursed, and no one can say
Jesus is Lord except by the Holy
Spirit.
Paul makes this very important
statement.
No one who has the Spirit says
Jesus is anathema or accursed,
and no one can say Jesus is Lord
except by the Spirit.
Now we don't want to take Paul
overly literally here.
There's no magic in this
particular phrase.
Paul is not claiming that I am
physically unable to utter the
phrase Jesus is Lord unless I
have the Spirit, and conversely,
once I have the Spirit, I'm
somehow physically unable to say
Jesus is cursed.
That's not what he's saying.
There are all kinds of people
who have said these phrases with
and without faith, and the
words themselves are not an
infallible sign of whether or
not the Spirit of God is at work
in someone.
The problem in Corinth is not
that someone is standing up and
ecstatically uttering Jesus is
Lord and they can't figure out
if the Holy Spirit's behind it
or not.
That's that doesn't make any
sense.
It makes much more sense to
understand these phrases as
summary statements of the
fundamental belief of the person
speaking.
If you embrace the idea that
Jesus is Lord, it is because God
has given you saving faith
through his Holy Spirit.
So no one can say and mean
Jesus is my Lord without the
Spirit of God at work in him
giving him faith.
Likewise, no one can say and
mean Jesus is a fraud and I
don't want anything to do with
him as an expression of faith.
When we're confronted with the
claims of Jesus of Nazareth,
there are only two fundamental
responses.
We can accept and embrace his
claims, or we can reject his
claims and reject Jesus.
To say Jesus is anathema means
Jesus is under a band.
He is someone to dismiss, to
reject, or to avoid.
I don't accept his claims, I
don't want to follow him in any
way, he is to be rejected.
On the other hand, to say that
Jesus is Lord is to embrace and
accept a fundamental truth of
the gospel.
Now it's interesting that he
includes both, and it's I want
to kind of ask why couldn't you
just say Jesus is Lord and leave
out the other one?
But I think he includes both
because in the pagan trances,
when you were under the
influence of a temple god, you
could say just about anything.
You could say one thing and
another person could say the
opposite, and no one really
cared much.
But in Christianity, it matters
what you say.
The content of what you say
matters a great deal, and you
must be able to say and mean
Jesus is Lord.
Paul's trying to tell them,
look, your pagan background has
confused you about what
constitutes true spirituality
and what constitutes a sign that
the Spirit of God is at work in
someone.
The question is not have you
lost control in a trance or
speaking in tongues?
The question is what do you do
with Jesus?
It doesn't matter how ecstatic
you are or what you seem to be
experiencing, the question is do
you embrace and confess that
Jesus is Lord?
If you have come to genuine
saving faith and embrace the
claims of Jesus, then you're a
spiritual person.
It doesn't matter whether
you've ever spoken in tongues or
not.
We can only recognize that
Jesus is Lord by the power of
God.
We may never speak in tongues,
but if when we speak we show
that we understand that Jesus is
the Lord, the Messiah, the King
of kings, then we are
spiritual.
The Spirit of God has
manifested Himself in us because
we reveal that we genuinely
understand who Jesus is and we
embrace Him and want to follow
Him.
On the other hand, it doesn't
matter if we're ranting and
dancing and raving and speaking
in tongues if we've rejected the
claims of Christ.
Paul's saying, I don't care how
visual or dramatic your
experience is, your experience
is useless if you don't embrace
the claims of Jesus Christ.
So the mark of the Spirit, the
mark of the Spirit of God at
work in a person's life is not
what kind of ecstatic outward
experience they have.
The mark of the Spirit of God
at work in a person's life is
that they can say and mean in a
very profound way that Jesus
Christ is Lord.
That's the spiritual person.
The spiritual person embraces
and follows Christ.
The person who rejects him is
not spiritual.
So you do you want to know what
the mark of true spirituality
is?
That's it.
The mark of God at work in
someone's life is that that
person will say and mean that
Jesus is Lord.
Okay, since this is the
foundation for the rest of his
argument, I want to spend some
time on what it what does it
mean when we say Jesus is Lord?
When I say Jesus is Lord, what
am I saying?
It's not that different from
saying Jesus is the Christ.
Jesus is Lord is a shorthand
phrase for the specific beliefs
that make up the gospel.
The gospel is sometimes summed
up as Jesus is Lord, and God
demonstrated that by raising him
from the dead.
So Jesus is the anointed king
who will rule over God's
creation, which is to say, He's
Lord.
He is the one who has been
given rule over all.
He has been chosen to speak for
God, to rule for God, to teach
in God's name, to Represent him
to judge and forgive in God's
name.
Paul summarizes it this way in
Romans ten, this is Romans ten
nine.
If you confess with your mouth
Jesus is Lord and believe in
your heart that God raised him
from the dead, you will be
saved.
Peter says something very
similar in his sermon in Acts.
This is Acts 236.
Therefore let all the house of
Israel know for certain that God
has made him both Lord and
Christ, this Jesus whom you
crucified.
That's a quick summary of the
gospel.
Jesus is the one God made Lord
and Christ, and God demonstrated
that He did that through this
sign of raising Jesus from the
dead.
When I first come to faith, one
of the first things I realize
is that I have been created by
God, and God has the right to
tell me what is true, what is
not true, and to determine my
destiny.
So he has the right to tell me
right from wrong, how I must
live my life and determine my
fate.
He is the standard by which I
will be measured, and he has the
authority and the right to
judge me.
And God has appointed Christ to
represent him and proclaim
truth and teach us how to find
life.
So the Messiah, the Christ,
represents God for all those
things that God has the right to
do, like tell me what is right
and wrong, tell me what is true
and what's a lie, tell me how I
must live and determine my
destiny.
So the Messiah is my master and
king who tells me what to do on
behalf of God, and he is the
one who will ultimately
determine what happens to me.
And that Messiah is Jesus of
Nazareth.
And I know this because God
raised him from the dead.
Jesus stood right in front of
the teachers of the law, the
people who were described as
searching the scriptures to find
the Messiah, and they failed to
recognize him.
He stood right in front of them
teaching and preaching and
performing miracles, and they
said, No, you're not the
Messiah, we're looking for
someone else.
So to say that Jesus of
Nazareth is Lord, that the
carpenter who lived at a certain
period in history, who taught
and performed miracles and was
crucified on the cross and rose
from the dead, to say that he is
Lord is to say that He is the
Messiah.
He is the one who's been
appointed to speak for God.
What he says is true.
His teaching is the truth I
have to follow.
His words are the words of
life.
He is the one who has the power
to forgive my sins and grant me
eternal life.
He is also the one who has the
power to judge and condemn and
destroy me.
His commands will set the
course of my life, and he is the
one I will seek to worship and
obey.
To say Jesus is Lord is to look
at the life and message of
Jesus of Nazareth and say, I
believe He's the one.
I believe He is the Messiah.
He is the one who speaks for
God.
God has appointed him as King
of kings and Lord of Lords, and
He will rule over all creation.
I believe He has the words of
life, and I want to find eternal
life, so He's the one I must
listen to.
That's the truth I have to
embrace.
As I look at His teaching then
I see I'm called to love the
Lord with all my heart, I'm
called to love my neighbor as
myself, and I have profoundly
failed at both of these because
I'm a sinner.
Thankfully, Jesus the Messiah
has come to offer his life as
the payment for my guilt so that
I might find forgiveness and be
reconciled to God.
True life is not found in the
things of this world, but it's
found in the coming kingdom of
God.
I'm not saved by my religious
performance, by my outward
keeping of the law, or by how
good or wise I am, I'm saved by
the mercy of God through the
blood of Christ.
If the Spirit of God is at work
in me, then I see that set of
ideas as truth.
I know that what Jesus is
teaching is from God, that He
has the words of life, that the
truth is what He says is true,
and that my eternal destiny is
in His hands.
So to summarize Paul's point in
these three verses, Paul's
speaking to a group of believers
who are grading and judging
each other by whether or not
they speak in tongues.
God is clearly working in those
who speak in tongues, they
think, but we're not sure about
everyone else.
Because of their pagan
background, they think that the
mark of spirituality, the mark
that the Holy Spirit is at work
in someone's life, is that that
person speaks in tongues.
If you're not speaking in
tongues, then you better be
worried because you may not be a
child of God or a spiritual
person.
Paul says that's not the mark
of a child of God.
The person who is truly
spiritual, the person in whom
the Holy Spirit is clearly at
work is the person who can say
and mean in a profound way that
Jesus is Lord.
You can tell a truly spiritual
person by how they respond to
Jesus.
If they embrace and accept him
as Lord, then they're his
children.
If they reject him or mock and
dismiss him and think he's a
fraud, then they're not his
children.
If I'm going to ask the
question who's spiritual, which
people are following God, that's
the criteria I want to use.
If I'm judging myself as to
whether or not I'm a child of
God, that's the standard I want
to use.
So you want to know who's a
spiritual person?
You can tell by what comes out
of their mouth, but it's not
tongues, it's whether or not
they embrace the fact that Jesus
is Lord.
Before we go on, I want to stop
and think about this
perspective on what true
spirituality looks like.
The Corinthians thought true
spirituality was marked by these
visible, outward, ecstatic
experiences, and some people
today would share that same
view, but think about the other
ways that we define spirituality
and how we grade how mature or
how spiritual someone is today.
A couple of years ago, it was
very popular to talk about
kingdom oriented vocation.
It's a great phrase.
And the basic idea is that all
jobs are not created equal.
As a believer, you ought to
choose a vocation that gives you
not just a job and an income,
but you ought to choose a job
that allows you to do kingdom
work.
And that was the phrase kingdom
work, kingdom oriented careers.
And not surprisingly, the way
they defined kingdom work looked
a lot like liberal social
justice causes.
Companies that made lipstick or
frozen yogurt or pet food, well
that's just kind of trivial,
that's not kingdom work.
And I heard one speaker
actually use these exact
examples and argue that God
would never call believers to
work in a lipstick factory or to
make dog food or to create ice
cream flavors.
And further, she went on to
argue, if you think he is
calling you to do that, then
you've wasted your life.
Because in this speaker's
opinion, lipstick, dog food, and
ice cream don't bring any value
to the kingdom the way
something like bringing clean
water to a remote African tribe
brings value to the kingdom.
Well, is that what being a
spiritual person looks like?
Would Paul really say that the
mark of a spiritual person is
that they choose not to design a
new flavor of ice cream and
instead they choose to design a
clean water filter?
I think God could call you to
design ice cream and minister to
the people in your factory just
as easily as he could call you
to work on clean water in
Africa.
And I think that's the same
mistake the Corinthians were
making in elevating tongues over
all the other gifts.
We've just changed the mark.
Today we elevate social justice
causes over everything else and
define that as the mark of
being a spiritual person.
I'm pressing on this point
because it's foundational to his
argument, and if we really
grasp what he's saying here
about the mark of spirituality
is being able to say Jesus is
Lord, it's gonna make a big
difference as we go through the
rest of chapter twelve.
So think about some of the
other ways we define
spirituality.
We sometimes define the
spiritual person as the one who
can say think deeply and
meditate on the meaning of life,
and they're above all the
mundane daily tasks.
Or sometimes we think the
spiritual person is the one who
has forsaken worldly possessions
and simplified their life like
Thoreau on Walden Pond.
Or maybe the spiritual person
is someone who's devoted her
life to serving the poor like
Mother Teresa.
Or maybe it's someone who's
traveled to a foreign country to
be a missionary and maybe even
given his life for it, like Jim
Elliot.
The non Christian world tends
to define a spiritual person as
someone who does something
extraordinary, something other
than work and raising a family,
and we fall into that same trap.
But Paul has a very specific
definition of spirituality, and
his definition does not depend
on the fact that your job is
something that you could call
kingdom oriented or not.
It's not dependent on whether
or not you're a missionary,
whether or not you're a
professional minister, whether
you start a nonprofit, cure
cancer, work on racial
reconciliation, or social
justice causes.
Those are all good things to
do, but they do not mark you out
as a spiritual giant.
They do not make you a better
Christian than someone who works
at Walmart and raises children.
For Paul, to be a spiritual
person means that the Spirit of
God is working in me, and the
work that that spirit is doing
is to transform my heart so that
I can say and mean in a
profound way that Jesus Christ
is Lord.
Ultimately, the Holy Spirit is
changing me from a rebel sinner
who rejects the claims of Christ
and hates God to a forgiven,
repentant sinner who embraces
the claims of Christ and loves
God.
In Paul's letters, he
frequently contrasts the spirit
and the flesh, and he means more
than the contrast between that
which is physical and seen and
that which is intangible and
unseen.
The contrast is between what I
am by nature left to myself and
what I am after the Spirit of
God has started working in me to
write his law in my heart.
So the flesh is what I am left
to myself with my own resources
apart from the Spirit of God at
work in me.
The Spirit is what I am and who
I am after the Spirit of God
has started working in me.
So how do I know the Spirit of
God is at work in me?
Paul tells us right in this
passage.
Therefore, I make known to you
that no one speaking by the
Spirit of God says Jesus is
accursed, and no one can say
Jesus is Lord except by the Holy
Spirit.
That fundamental stance that
accepts that Jesus is Lord is
the mark of a spiritual person.
That's the manifestation of the
Spirit of God working in a
person's life.
So spirituality for Paul is
very specific, but it's not
necessarily flashy outward
emotional experiences.
It's not the feeling I have
after singing the right songs.
It's not the feelings I have
after a great sermon or a
devotional talk.
It's not any kind of vague
mystical feeling I get when I
meditate on God's words.
It's not marked by social
justice causes or giving away
lots of money to worthy causes.
It's not marked by my choice of
profession or my lack of
material things.
It's not even marked by being a
good, nice person.
For Paul to be a spiritual
person is to be someone who can
say and mean in a profound way
that Jesus Christ is Lord.
That is true spirituality.
And that idea is going to
become very important as we go
through the rest of the chapter,
because that's the foundation
he's going to build his argument
on.
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
My mission is to explain not
only what a passage means, but
how I reach those conclusions.
If you've been helped by this
podcast, please leave a positive
comment on your favorite
podcast platform and tell your
friends.
It's really easy to subscribe,
just go to
Wednesdayintheword.com and click
on subscribe to this podcast.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by Reggie Coates of
heartfeltmusic.org.
I invite you to check out his
other music.
Thanks for joining me today.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you here next week at
Wednesday in the Word.