Read the transcript
Welcome to Wednesday in the Word with Krisan Marotta. What the Bible means and how we know. For more talks and study materials, visit wednesdayintheword.com.
Speaker 1: We are in Matthew 13
today, and for those of you who
are new, we're it starts on page
13 of your study guide.
And there is a schedule on page
two that tells you where we're
going to be each week.
So if you missed, you can
always figure out where we are.
Most of you will recall that we
were hit by the state of
Virginia was hit by one of those
big storms.
I've forgotten what you call
them, they have a funny name.
Yeah.
Dere how do you say it?
Derecho.
Derecho.
On last June.
And of course we were one of
several states, and almost the
entire state was without power.
And I bet you all have stories
to tell about that.
We were out without power for
over a week.
And then following the storm,
we had this record heat and
humidity, which makes me wonder
how anyone lived in Virginia
before air conditioning.
I don't I don't know how that
how we survived.
But part of what made that
storm so fierce was not just the
fact that we had these
hurricane force winds without
the hurricane, but it came out
of nowhere.
So unlike most of the storms
where they're tracking them for
days and you're getting warnings
and they tell you what's
coming, there weren't any
warnings, there weren't any
watches posted, there was no
advanced notice from the media.
All of a sudden we got this
violent wall of wind and none of
us were ready for it.
Well, I bring that up because
the Bible uses images of storms
and natural disasters to teach
us about God's judgment, and
judgment is at the heart of our
parable today.
So we're looking at the parable
of the wheat and the tares, and
if I could summarize that in
one sentence, I'd say God delays
his judgment to give us time to
prepare.
But rest assured, judgment is
coming.
So we could stop there, but I
have a microphone, so I'm going
to keep going.
So the parable is going to
teach us that judgment when it
comes will be fierce and
terrible like the storms we had
last summer, but unlike our
summer storm, we have had, we've
been warned well in advance.
Now, the concept of God's
judgment has fallen out of favor
today.
It's not something we like to
talk about.
Um we think of, oh, you know,
that's what Jonathan Edwards
talked about and those kinds of
preachers, but to our modern
ears, judgment seems unfair and,
well, judgmental.
We'd much rather talk about how
God is a God of peace and love
who unites us in our diversity
and overcomes our social
barriers and the class barriers
we erect.
But the fact remains that God
is a judgmental God, and the
Bible presents him as such.
So while our culture is trying
to insist that all ideas are
equal, there are everything's a
shade of gray, the truth is
relative, the Bible paints a
very different picture.
The Bible claims there is such
a thing as good and evil, right
and wrong, sin and
righteousness, goats and sheep,
or in our parable today, wheat
and tares, and God is going to
make a distinction.
So we're going to delve into
those unpopular waters today and
talk about judgment.
So this parable that we're
looking at, the wheat and the
tares, immediately follows the
parable we talked about last
week, the sower and the seed.
And just to review briefly from
last week, the parable of the
sower explained why Jesus'
ministry seemed to be
ineffective.
Remember, the Jews expected
that when the Messiah came, that
he would bring these kind of
cataclysmic changes, that he
would usher in the kingdom of
God, that evil would be judged,
and that not just Israel, but
everyone would bow to God as God
and recognize him as such.
And now Jesus was here and
there didn't seem to be that
much response.
So the people were saying,
What's going on?
This doesn't mean this isn't
what we expected, and the
parable of the sower and the
seed addresses that expectation.
That it's no surprise that out
of the many people who hear the
message of the gospel, only a
few respond because only a
certain type of person will
respond.
The person who is like the good
soil, that is, those to whom
God has given ears to hear and
eyes to see, those to whom God
has given faith.
So the first part of their
expectation was that the whole
world would bow down to God as
king when the Messiah came, and
the sower addresses why that's
not happening.
But the second part of their
expectation is that the Messiah
would establish his kingdom by
judging the powers of evil.
And so the parable of the wheat
and tares addresses, well, why
isn't that happening?
Okay, so the Messiah's here,
and we understand that salvation
is only granted to those who
have faith, and faith itself is
a gift of God, and only those
who have been given faith will
have the eyes to see and the
ears to hear.
But why isn't the Messiah
judging everyone else?
That's the cultural
expectation.
So why are the wicked
continuing to prosper alongside
the righteous?
And what's happening here?
So the kingdom of God we know
must contain no evil, therefore,
evil must be judged.
So when the Messiah comes and
establishes his kingdom, it
should involve this moral
cleansing because God is a holy
God.
How else could you bring in the
kingdom of God except to have
that victory over sin and evil
and judging those who don't
adhere to the law, like the
Romans or other Gentiles, or uh
and establishing this political
reign of Israel.
So just to give you an example
of what they expected, this is
back in Matthew 3.
Um, and if you don't have a
Bible and you want a Bible,
there are lots of them on the
shelves in the back of the room,
so feel free to grab one.
Because I'm also going to be
looking at Zephaniah today, so
you you might want to grab a
Bible if you don't have one.
So I'm looking at Matthew 3,
verses 7 through 12.
This is John the Baptist
talking.
It says, But when he, that is
John the Baptist, saw many of
the Pharisees and Sadducees
coming for baptism, he said to
them, You brood of vipers, who
warned you to flee from the
wrath to come?
Therefore bear fruit in keeping
with repentance.
And do not suppose that you can
say to yourselves, we have
Abraham for our father, for I
say to you that from these
stones God is able to raise up
children of Abraham.
The axe is already laid at the
root of the trees, therefore
every tree that does not bear
good fruit is cut down and
thrown into the fire.
So he's speaking to the
religious leaders of his day who
are coming to him, and they're
saying, Well, why are you coming
to be baptized when you haven't
even repented?
Don't you understand that it's
not enough to be physically
Jewish or a descendant of
Abraham?
God can make anyone a
descendant of Abraham.
What you need to do is is
repent.
Then he goes on in verse
eleven.
As for me, I baptize you with
water for repentance, but he who
is coming after me is mightier
than I.
I am not fit to remove his
sandals.
He will baptize you with the
Holy Spirit in fire, and then
listen to verse twelve.
His widowing fork is in his
hand, and he will thoroughly
clear his threshing floor, and
he will gather his wheat into
the barn, but he will burn up
the chaff with unquenchable
fire.
So John the Baptist is
describing this coming judgment
and this moral cleansing that
the Messiah is going to bring,
and this is what the disciples
were looking for.
So Jesus is here teaching and
preaching, and they're looking
around, going, Well, the
response seems a little thin,
and look at all these people who
are following him.
They're sinners, they're tax
gatherers, they're prostitutes,
they're those who just want to
see a miracle or a sideshow,
those who want free food, those
who are seeking a civil war
against Rome.
So these people don't look like
the kind who are fit for the
kingdom of God.
And the parable of the wheat
and tears is to answer that
question, to say, well, when is
this judgment?
When where is the Christ who's
going to thoroughly cleanse his
chip his threshing floor?
When is that going to happen?
And that's what Jesus is
answering.
And he's saying, God delays his
judgment.
It's not now, it's not yet, and
he's delaying judgment to give
us time to respond so that no
none of his children will be
lost.
But rest assured, judgment's
coming.
Okay, so let's look at the
parable.
Turn back over to Matthew 13.
We're going to start in 24
through 30, which is where he
tells the parables.
And I'm going to slide over
here into the light a little.
Okay, so Matthew 13, 24 through
30.
Jesus presented another parable
to them, saying, The kingdom of
heaven may be compared to a man
who sowed good seed in his
field.
But while his men were
sleeping, his enemy came and
sowed tares among the wheat and
went away.
But when the wheat sprouted and
bore grain, then the tares
became evident also.
The slaves of the landowner
came and said to him, Sir, did
you not sow good seed in your
field?
How then does it have tares?
And he said to them, An enemy
has done this.
The slaves said to him, Do you
want us then to go and gather
them up?
But he said, No, for while you
are gathering up the tares, you
may uproot the re wheat with
them.
Allow both to grow together
until the harvest, and in the
time of the harvest I will say
to the reapers, First gather up
the tares and bind them in
bundles to burn them up, but
gather the wheat into my barn.
Alright, so let's talk about
the dynamic of the parable and
then we're going to talk about
then we're going to look at how
Jesus explains it.
Some scholars object to this
parable as unrealistic because
weeds don't need sowing.
They grow by themselves, right?
And if you need proof of that,
just come look at my front
flower bed.
I I'm conducting an experiment.
And you don't need to sow the
weeds, they just come along.
However, it must have been a
pretty common crime because
there's a whole section of Roman
law that deals with the
punishments of people who sowed
bad seed in someone else's
field.
So we assume it must have been
a common enough problem that
they had laws about it.
The plant he's talking about,
the tares, is also called the
darnell, and it's
indistinguishable from wheat in
its early stages.
It's kind of a pseudo-wheat,
but its seed is a narcotic when
it's eaten, so it's very
different.
And in its early development,
the plant's indistinguishable
from genuine wheat, and it so
closely resembles wheat that the
rabbis thought that it was like
a degenerate form of wheat,
like it was a subspecies of some
kind.
Modern botanists say that's not
true, but at least it points to
how similar the two plants are.
So at their early stages of
growth, you can't tell the two
apart, and even careful scrutiny
will produce errors.
But once the grain develops,
you can tell the two apart
because the tears are shorter
and they're darker colored.
But by that time they've grown
so closely together that their
roots are intertwined.
So you can't pull up one
without pulling up the other
because their roots are
intermingled in the ground.
So as best we can figure out in
practice, tares were separated
from the wheat after the harvest
at the threshing, and then they
were bundled and dried and used
for fuel.
So, like the parable of the
sower, Jesus gives us an
explanation of this parable.
So we're going to look at his
explanation and skip down to
1336, and we'll look at 1336 to
43.
Then he left the crowds and
went into the house, and his
disciples came to him and said,
Explain to us the parable of the
tares of the field.
And he said, The one who sows
the good seed is the Son of Man,
and the field is the world, and
as for the good seed, these are
the sons of the kingdom, and
the tares are the sons of the
evil one.
And the enemy who sowed them is
the devil, and the harvest is
the end of the age, and the
reapers are the angels.
So just as the tares are
gathered up and burned with
fire, so shall it be at the end
of the age.
The Son of Man will send forth
his angels, and they will gather
out of his kingdom all
stumbling blocks, and those who
commit lawlessness, and will
throw them into the furnace of
fire.
In that place there will be
weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Then the righteousness will
shine forth then the righteous
will shine forth as a sun in the
kingdom of their father.
He who has ears to hear, let
him hear.
And in what Daniel is talking
about, there is a promise of the
future resurrection.
So that I think that's what
Jesus is saying, and they there
will be this resurrection, the
righteous will shine forth as
the sun.
Now, at first glance, it looks
like Jesus is interpreting this
parable as if it were an
allegory.
And so we have to address that
because it looks like he's
making a one-to-one
substitution.
But I look closer, I don't
think it is, and I don't think
he interprets it as an allegory.
Like the parable of the sower
that we looked at last week,
this is an analogy with many
points of similarity.
So how do we know it's not an
allegory?
First, the story doesn't rely
on any symbolic value of the
elements.
So there's no indication that
wheat or tares or the field or
the enemy or the landowner or
any of those were always used to
refer to son of man, son of the
devil, the world, and so on.
They didn't have any obvious
cultural symbols in and of
themselves.
And the disciples, if they had,
the disciples wouldn't have
required an explanation.
And Jesus could have told the
same story by talking about a
good twin and an evil twin and
not judging them until they've
grown up and revealed their true
characters.
So there's a he could have told
the same story with a different
p different dynamic.
The point comes from the
dynamic of the story, and the
elements in the story are like
reality.
So I would understand Jesus'
explanation as saying the one
who sows is like the good seed,
the field is like the world in
some way, and so on.
Then he's making a comparison.
But the most compelling
argument is look at how Jesus
sets it up and how he concludes
it.
In 1324, he says, the kingdom
of heaven may be compared to a
man who sowed good seed in this
field.
So he's telling you right at
the outset, this is a
comparison.
I'm making a relationship
between the dynamic of the story
and something in reality.
And a comparison is an analogy,
not an allegory.
And then when he concludes it
in 1340, he says, so just as the
tares are gathered up in bird
with a fire, so shall it be at
the end of the age.
And that just as just as in the
story, so something in reality
is the hallmark of an analogy.
That is the like the golden uh
medal that you're trying to get
to with analogy is to be able to
come up with a just as-so
statement.
And that's the point of the
comparison.
So he tells us this has
something to do with judgment,
that it's a comparison between
what's going on in the story and
what happens in reality, and
then he gives us this just as-so
statement to conclude it.
So that's why it's an analogy.
So the parable teaches us
there's this delay in the coming
judgment, so just as pulling up
the tares was delayed until the
harvest, so no wheat would be
lost, so judgment will be
delayed until the day of the
Lord, so that none of his people
will be lost.
But notice that in his
explanation, Jesus emphasizes
judgment is coming.
Just as the tares were gathered
up in the harvest, so it will
be at the end of the age.
So there will be this gathering
and this judgment.
So some people make the mistake
of thinking that the Old
Testament presents God as a
judge and the New Testament
presents God as a God of love.
But the fact is there are
hundreds of references to God as
of love and mercy in the Old
Testament, and hundreds of
references to God as a j
judging, righteous judge in the
New Testament.
And this is one of them.
So the fact that Jesus teaches
a parable to explain why
judgment is not yet coming means
it's coming.
So God is both just and loving,
both merciful and
compassionate, and just and
judgmental, if you will, or are
a righteous judge.
So we have to understand both
sides of his character to
understand him.
Okay, so we're going to talk a
lot more about judgment.
This is probably not going to
be too popular a topic, but I
think it's necessary because
it's fallen so out of far out of
favor today, we just don't
quite understand what's coming.
And most scholars see Matthew
13, 41 through 43 as a reference
to Zephaniah 1.3, because while
Jesus doesn't quote word for
word from Zephaniah, he uses the
exact same language we find in
Zephaniah, and he makes a
similar point of comparison.
So I want to look at that.
The book of Zephaniah is not
taught very often today.
In it you'll find, as one of
the commentators said, a very
judgmental prophet who speaks
for a very judgmental God.
And what Zephaniah, he allows
no shades of gray, there's no
moral relativism, there's no
compromise between good and
evil.
And while you'll find a lot of
books in the Bible talk about
God as a righteous judge at
points, Zephaniah gives us the
most intense, kind of complete
picture of the coming judgment.
And if we were going to go
through and edit out the
passages that talk about
judgment, we would have to erase
the whole book of Zephaniah.
Just about.
So, but we don't want to do
that.
So before we look at this
section, let me give you a
little background.
Zephaniah preached during the
reign of King Josiah, which was
640 BC to 609 BC, and his basic
message is judgment is coming,
so be prepared.
That's essentially the point of
the book.
So just where we are in
history, you'll recall that
under the unit the monarchy or
the country was united under
David and Solomon.
After Solomon's death, the
nation underwent a civil war
that resulted in a split
kingdom.
So there was the northern
kingdom that was made up of ten
tribes, and the southern kingdom
with two tribes, and they had a
different king on each throne.
At this point, the northern
kingdom has been wiped out.
The Assyrians conquered them in
722 BC, and only the two
southern tribes are left, the
kingdom of Judah, and that's the
kingdom that Zephaniah is
preaching to.
At the point he's preaching,
there hasn't been a good king on
the throne for about two
generations, and the people are
turning away from God.
Wickedness is rampant.
Now Josiah turns out to be a
good king.
He uh during his reign, we
don't know if it's before or
after Zephaniah preached, he's
cleaning out the temple and he
finds the law, and they read it
and they go, Oh my gosh, we're
messing up.
And there's he institutes a lot
of reforms.
So it's in this setting that
Zephaniah comes along and he
says, Jerusalem's gonna fall,
and more than that, judgment is
coming.
So let if you have your Bible,
I look at Zephaniah chapter 1,
and these first three verses are
what uh Jesus is alluding to.
So this is Zephaniah 1, 1
through 3, and God is he is
warning that God is going to
judge the entire earth.
So the word of the Lord came to
Zephaniah, son of Cushai, son
of Gedaliah, son of Amariah, son
of Hezekiah, in the days of
Josiah, who was the king, son of
Amnon, king of Judah.
I will completely remove all
things from the face of the
earth, declares the Lord.
So that's the thesis of the
book.
And from there he's going to
amplify it.
But this is there's no like
greetings, peace.
It's I will completely remove
all things from the face of the
earth, unless you think anything
will be spared.
Look at 1.3, I will remove man
and beast, I will remove the
birds of the sky and the fish of
the sea and the ruins along
with the wicked, and I will cut
off man from the face of the
earth, declares the word the
Lord.
Now that word ruins is also
translated stumbling blocks, and
it is the word that's the
Aramaic or Greek word Jesus is
using is from this passage.
So he starts out and he says,
I'm going to judge the entire
earth, and then in 4 through 11
he focuses on the southern
kingdom itself.
He says, I will stretch out my
hand against Judah, against all
the inhabitants of Jerusalem, I
will cut off from this place the
remnant of Baal and the name of
the idolatrous priests along
with the priests, those who bow
down on the roofs to the host of
heaven, those who bow down and
swear to the Lord and yet swear
by Milcom, which is another god,
those who have turned back from
following the Lord, who do not
seek the Lord or inquire of him.
Be silent before the Lord God,
for the day of the Lord is near.
The Lord has prepared a
sacrifice and consecrated his
guests.
And on the day of the Lord's
sacrifice, I will punish the
officials and the king's sons,
and all who array themselves in
foreign attire.
On that day I will punish
everyone who leaps over the
threshold, and those who fill
their master's house with
violence and fraud.
On that day, declares the Lord,
a cry will be heard from the
fish gate, a wail from the
second quarter, a loud crash
from the hills.
Wail, O inhabitants of the
mortar, for all the traitors are
no more.
All who weigh silver who weigh
out silver are cut off.
And then he focuses in on
Jerusalem itself.
At that time I will search
Jerusalem with lamps, I will
punish the men who are
complacent, and those who say in
their hearts, The Lord will not
do good, nor will he do ill.
Their goods shall be plundered
and their houses laid waste.
Though they build houses, they
shall not inhabit them.
Though they plant vineyards,
they shall not drink wine from
them.
The great day of the Lord is
near, near and hastening fast.
The sound of the day of the
Lord is bitter, the mighty men
cries aloud there.
A day of wrath is that day, a
day of distress and anguish, a
day of ruin and devastation, a
day of darkness and gloom, a day
of clouds and thick darkness, a
day of trumpet blast and battle
cry against the fortified
cities and against the lofty
battlements.
Now, if that isn't bad enough,
listen to how he concludes.
I will bring distress on
mankind so that they shall walk
like the blind, because they
have sinned against the Lord.
Their blood shall be poured out
like dust and their flesh like
dung.
Neither their silver nor their
gold shall be able to deliver
them on the day of the wrath of
the Lord.
In the fire of his jealousy,
all the earth shall be consumed.
A full and sudden end he shall
make of all the inhabitants of
the earth.
Okay, not a pretty picture,
right?
So when God's judgment comes,
is there going to be anything
left?
Not much.
Now notice that what Zephaniah
is rebuking them for.
He's rebuking them because they
are turning to other gods and
they are not living.
Like judgment is coming.
So they're practicing other
religions, they're following the
superstitions of other religion
and trying to blend in with the
other cultures.
So the references in verse 5 to
bow down on the rooftops to the
host of heaven is worshiping
the stars.
Swearing by Milcom is swearing
by another god, arraying
themselves in foreign attire,
verse 6, they're trying to look
like other people around them.
Jumping over the threshold in
verse 9 is a reference to mixing
other practices into their
worship.
And just let me explain that
one to you, because a few years
ago we studied 1 and 2 Samuel.
So those of you who are in 1
Samuel, you'll remember this.
You'll remember that early in
Samuel the Ark of the Covenant
is captured by the Philistines,
and they put it in their temple,
and their God Dagon, their big
s statue is there, and the next
morning their their statue of
Dagon has fallen over.
So they prop him back up, and
the next morning he's fallen
over again, but this time his
hands and his feet or his hands
and his head are cut off.
And the text tells us they fell
over the threshold and cut off.
So what happened in Philistine
culture is they this
superstition developed about the
mighty power of the threshold.
You couldn't step on the
threshold or it would anger the
God and you would be harmed in
some way.
And so they would they, you
know, like don't step on a crack
or you'll make your mother
mother's brack, you know, that
little child's rhyme.
They would jump over the
threshold or make sure they
didn't step on it so as not to
anger their God.
Well, the Israelites should
have known better.
That it wasn't the power of the
threshold that decapitated
their God, it was Yahweh, the
the God of their their religion.
So he's he is chastising them
for bringing in this
superstition from the
Philistines when they really
should have known better.
So just since those of you who
are here in 1 Samuel, I thought
you'd like to see how that
carried through history.
So they're mixing in the
reference uh religions of other
gods and superstitions, and they
think gods are relevant.
Notice in verse 12, or is it
wait, I lost the reference.
He talks about they've grown
complacent.
Yeah, in 12, they won't he
won't do good or evil.
Um, and they're thinking that
because God has delayed his
judgment, he's going to be
merciful forever, and they begin
trusting in their wealth and
their posterity instead.
So that's the references to the
building houses, planting
vineyards, drinking wine and
their gold and silver.
So Zephaniah issues this
morning.
He says, look, God is a holy
God, he cares, and judgment is
coming, and you need to live
like it.
Now the fact that judgment is
coming means there is a standard
of right and wrong.
So our culture who's saying
there isn't a standard, truth is
relative, if it works for you,
that's okay, but if it works for
me doesn't work for me, that's
okay, it's all relative.
I can pick whatever truth I
want.
God, the Bible would say, not
so.
There is a standard by which to
judge, and God is going to
follow it.
So the whole fact that judgment
is coming means there must be a
basis on which to judge, and
that is the righteousness and
holiness of God.
So God's judgment when it comes
will be devastating and
complete, and it may seem like
it's slow in coming, but we
don't realize what fully what
that coming means.
Or we secretly believe we're
going to escape it, you know,
like those keep off the grass
signs, they apply to everyone
but me, right?
So we think, well, judgment is
coming, but it's going to apply
to everyone but me.
Just uh Amos addresses this.
This is one of my favorite
judgment passages.
This is Amos 5, 18 through 20.
He says, Alas, you who are
longing for the day of the Lord,
for what purpose will the day
of the Lord be to you?
So he's saying, okay, those of
you who are looking forward to
judgment because you think
you're gonna pass, here's the
answer.
It will be darkness and not
light, as when a man flees from
a lion and a bear meets him, or
goes home and leaves his hand
against the wall and a snake
bites him.
Will not the day of the Lord be
darkness instead of light, even
gloom with no brightness in it?
So Amos is addressing that
expectation saying, You think
that you're gonna escape God's
judgment because you're good
enough.
You've made this sincere good
faith effort at middle class
morality and decent living, and
you know, you're not like those
sinners and tax gatherers and
drug dealers and and murderers.
So you think judgment will come
and God's gonna praise you
while he's judging everyone
else?
And he says, You're like a man
who flees from a lion only to be
eaten by a bear, or a man who
flees from a lion only to go
home and be bitten by a snake.
You don't realize the depth of
your sinfulness, and that no
human being is going to be able
to stand.
Now, Zephaniah gives us this
terrible picture of judgment in
chapter one, and then look at
how chapter two starts.
This is what he expects us to
do in response.
It says, gather yourselves
together, yes, gather, O nation
without shame.
Before the decree takes effect,
the day passes like chaff,
before the burning anger of the
Lord comes upon you, before the
day of the Lord's anger comes
upon you, seek the Lord, all you
humble of the earth, who have
carried out his ordinances.
Seek righteousness, seek
humility.
Perhaps you will be hidden in
the day of the Lord's anger.
So he points out the severity
of God's judgment, and then he
says, prepare for it.
And how do you prepare?
You seek God.
You humble yourself before him
so that you will be hidden on
the day of his wrath, because
none of us can stand on our own
merits.
So this he gives us this
incredible, devastating, severe
picture of judgment, wants us to
realize we're all in trouble,
and we should be grateful that
God delays long enough to bring
us to saving faith.
And then he said, There is a
way of hope.
Seek the Lord, all you humble
of the earth, seek righteousness
and seek humility.
Now don't be confused by that
perhaps in verse 3, where it
says, Perhaps you will be hidden
in the day of the Lord's anger.
The idea there is not that he's
a whimsical God.
You know, it's this isn't the
daisy game of he loves me, he
loves me not, he'll save me,
he'll save me not.
You know, it's not that's not
what he's saying.
The idea is that salvation is
entirely up to God.
So the perhaps is recognizing
that he has mercy on whom he
will have mercy, and he is not
required to save any of us.
So there none of us have earned
it.
None of us left to our own
merits have gained salvation
such that God is now obligated
to grant it to us.
Apart from the blood of Jesus
Christ, none of us has a claim
to salvation.
So that perhaps is recognizing
God owes us nothing.
We've done nothing to earn it.
We will be saved because God is
a loving, gracious, merciful
God who is lavish with his
grace, not because of anything
we've done.
So let me just conclude
Zephaniah, and then we're going
to look at trying to apply some
of this and ask, so what?
He goes on in the rest of
chapter three to kind of it's a
chiastic structure where he goes
back through judgment, or
through the rest of chapter two,
he goes back through judgment
against the nations, focuses in
again on Jerusalem, and then
returns to judgment over the
whole world.
And then in 3.8, he he comes
back around to his conclusion
again, and he says, Therefore,
wait for me, declares the Lord.
For the day when I rise up as a
witness, indeed my decision is
to gather the nations, to
assemble kingdoms, to pour out
my indignation, all my burning
anger, for all the earth shall
be devoured by the fire of my
zeal.
So he's saying, Yes, judgment
is coming, that's my decision,
but wait for me.
And then in 3 9, for then I
will give to the people purified
lips, that all of them may call
on the name of the Lord to
serve him shoulder to shoulder.
For beyond the rivers of
Ethiopia, from beyond the rivers
of Ethiopia, my worshippers, my
dispersed ones will bring my
offerings.
In that day you will feel no
shame because of all your deeds
by which you have rebelled
against me.
For then I will be removed from
your midst your proud, exalting
ones, and you will never again
be haughty on my holy mountain.
I will leave among you a humble
and lowly people, and they will
take refuge in the name of the
Lord.
The remnant of Israel will do
no wrong and tell no lies, nor
will a deceitful tongue be found
in their mouths, those for they
will feed and lie down with no
one to make them tremble.
So he's promising salvation and
restoration for his people, for
those who wait for him.
And Zephaniah says, What should
our response be?
314, shout for joy, O daughter
of Zion, shout in triumph, O
Israel.
Rejoice with all your heart, O
daughter of Jerusalem.
The Lord has taken away his
judgment against you.
He has cleared away your
enemies.
The King of Israel, the Lord,
is in your midst.
You will fear disaster no more.
On that day it shall be set in
Jerusalem, fear not, O Zion, let
your hand let not your hands
grow weak, for the Lord your God
is in your midst, a mighty one
who will save.
He will rejoice over you with
gladness, he will quiet you with
his love, he will exalt over
you with loud singing.
I will gather those of you who
mourn for the festival so that
you will no longer suffer
reproach.
Behold, at that time I will
deal with all your oppressors, I
will save the lame and gather
the outcast, and I will change
their shame into praise and
renown in all the earth.
At that time I will bring you
in, at that time when I gather
you together, for I will make
you renowned and praised among
all the peoples of the earth,
when I restore your fortunes
before your eyes, says the Lord.
So he gives this amazing
picture of judgment, this uh the
severity and completeness and
devastating picture of God's
wrath, and then he says, But
those who wait for the Lord will
escape, they will feel no
shame.
Not only that, they will be
made um given purified lips,
they are their shame will be put
away, they will rejoice.
So that's the balance we want
to remember, because Jesus is
pointing in this parable to
judgment is coming, and the
passages that teach us judgment
is in coming also teach us there
is a way out, there's a way of
escape, and it's through
trusting the Lord.
And so we should live like it.
So there is a standard of right
and wrong, and God cares about
it, and God delays his judgment
long enough to have mercy, so
that some of us will prepare and
come to know him.
So that that's what the parable
is as is assuring us.
So judgment is coming, not when
the Jews expected it to come
with the Messiah's first coming,
but with his second at the end
of the age.
And when that judgment comes,
it will be complete and thorough
and devastating.
But if you wait for him, if you
trust him, there is a a way of
hope.
So I would summarize this just
as the tares were not separated
from the wheat until the time
was right at the harvest, so God
will judge evil at the end of
the age.
Judgment is coming, and just as
the workers delayed pulling up
the tares until the harvest, so
no wheat would be lost, so God
delays his judgment so that none
of his people would be lost.
And what should our response
be?
Well, as Zephaniah said, seek
him.
Don't grow complacent, don't be
tempted to think that God's
delay in judgment means he's
left the left the room never to
come back.
Um or don't think you can
escape on your own merits.
There's only one way of escape,
and that's humbly trusting in
the blood of Jesus.
So let me let me go through a
little bit of application, and
then I'll give you time to ask
some questions.
Historically, this parable was
applied to church discipline.
So I want to talk about that.
So historically, people use
this parable to debate in the
church what do we do with
heretics, or what do we do with
people who aren't don't seem to
be following God?
What's the place of church
discipline?
And I don't pretend to have all
the answers here, but I want to
give you a flavor of the
debate, and then I'll tell you
which which side I can I fall
on.
So there was one group, the
Donatist, who emphasized the
idea that the field is the
world.
So they said, in the world, we
um we should tolerate evil, but
not in the church.
So the f Jesus is talking about
the world, and there we should
just let the sinners do what
they're gonna do.
They're not our place, but in
the church, we need to come down
on these people who are in the
church and and with discipline.
The pre-Reformation Catholics
emphasized the idea of gathering
the tares, you might uproot the
re the wheat.
So they said, no, you tolerate
evil if wheat is in danger.
So if there's danger of harming
a believer or a or a true
follower, then you you let it
go.
So but as long as there's no
danger from the wheat or danger
to the to the church, you can
rip up all the tares you want,
field or church, so world or
not.
And that led to their practice
of excommunication.
Then Luther came along and he
argued, no, what's forbidden is
the destruction of the tares.
So it's not its gathering.
So you can excommunicate
people, but you can't kill them.
So no more burning at the
stake, you know, because they
did burn heretics at the stake
back then.
And then there was another
group in that, in that around
the 16th century, who argued,
no, no, it's God and his angels
who do the judging.
So the church is just to bear
it patiently.
And so we should just recognize
that we live in an evil world
and we are not to judge at all.
And then around the early
1900s, scholars said, no, no,
they went back to the idea that
the point is not to uproot the
wheat by mistake, but as long as
there were no room for doubt,
you could uproot all you want.
So that's kind of where how the
debate's gone throughout
history.
And as I said, I don't have all
the answers.
When we judge, what we
tolerate, how long we delay, uh
it's complicated.
But the group that I agree with
is the scholars who say this
parable is addressing final
judgment, not church discipline.
So we need to realize that its
main focus and main point is
judgment at the end of the age
is coming, and Jesus does not
mean to address church
discipline.
And that kind of judgment, the
kind that's we will see at the
end of the age, is reserved for
God.
We're not even close to being
able to address that.
And so I would I fall in that
camp.
I don't think the parable is
addressing the issue of church
discipline directly directly,
and so we need to tread lightly
and carefully to find a theology
of church discipline from it.
There are other passages that
are much more clear and much
more helpful when it comes to
church discipline.
And I think just to go back to
Bible study, part of the reason
for the debate in history is
because of the methodology.
At that point, they were still
very much interpreting parables
as allegories, and so you'll
notice everyone's arguing from
the wording of the story, so
they're emphasizing the field,
or they're emphasizing the
reaping, or they're emphasizing
the uprooting, or who's doing
the pulling.
So they're arguing from the
little elements of the story,
and with parables, you want to
argue from the dynamic of the
story as a whole, not the
individual vocabulary.
So, as far as the question of
how much evil should we tolerate
in the church, which is really
the issue behind church
discipline, it seems to me
rather than looking at this
parable, we ought to look at,
say, Jesus' attitude toward
sinners.
Then it's beyond us who's a
Christian and who isn't to judge
that with 100% surety, what
looks to like wheat to us, maybe
tears and vice versa.
And Jesus' attitude toward
sinners was not particularly one
of judgment, but seeking.
So he was always trying to win
them.
Yes, to give them a healthy
view of their sinfulness, but to
win them to the kingdom.
And and to be fair, most
churches practice church
discipline with that goal in
mind.
Whatever they do is done with
the goal of winning back the one
who has lost.
So it seems to me the parable
is teaching us judgment is
coming, and we ought to live
like it.
That means we recognize there's
a standard of right and wrong.
We're not free to just say it's
all relative, it's all moral, I
can make my own truth.
And in the meantime, we should
take the same care and concern
to seeking the loss that Jesus
took.
And we're going to talk more
about that when in some of the
future parables.
Now that doesn't mean we ignore
sin.
I think we can be discerning
without being condemning.
And it's right and proper we
ought to seek to discern right
from wrong and truth from
falsehood and um moral and
proper actions from immoral,
selfish actions.
We ought to discern that, but
and we can discern that without
condemning the person behind it
or ourselves.
So look at the way Jesus dealt
with the lost.
He does give them a healthy
view that they are sinful and
they are lost, but he also seeks
to win them over.
So he doesn't whitewash sin or
excuse it as socially
acceptable, but neither does he
condemn the person behind it.
So he offers them grace and
hope.
Actually, you can't my husband
said, Well, except for the
Pharisees, you know, he said a
woe to them a lot.
And there is a point, there's
times when you someone needs to
hear the law because they need
to come face to face with their
sin, and there are times when
they need to hear grace because
they recognize their sins, and
now they need to know there's
hope.
So as I said, it's it's a
complicated issue, and I don't
have all the answers.
But at least from I think from
one of the things we can draw
from this parable is that
judgment is God's prerogative,
not ours, at least final
judgment.
And it's his job to judge those
who remain lost, and not our
job.
Our job is to try to win them
and to judge ourselves.
I mean, to see where our own
heart is, and are we prepared
for the kingdom?
Have we sought him and humbled
ourselves before him?
And um are we counting on
ourselves somehow to be good
enough in that day of judgment?
All right, let me pray for us
and then I'll give you a chance
to respond, ask some questions.
Father, thank you that um you
do delay your judgment to give
us time to come to know you and
to love you and and to become
people of a broken heart and
humble heart who uh count on
nothing but the blood of Jesus
for our salvation.
We pray that we would not grow
complacent in the delay, that we
would not grow um superstitious
or uh begin to turn away to
other practices, other gods,
other standards and systems of
right and wrong, but that we
would continually seek your face
and your word and your values
and your holiness.
And I pray that um you would be
taking these words and making
them real in our lives, not just
knowledge that we have in our
head, but that you would change
who we think we are, how we
understand, so that we would
grow more and more people who
trust you and follow you and
seek uh your kingdom.
In Jesus' name.
Amen.
Thank you for listening to Wednesday in the Word with Krisan Marotta. What the Bible means and how we know. For notes and study questions, visit wednesdayintheword.com. We hope you'll join us again, and may God richly bless you.