Read the transcript
Krisan Marotta: Welcome back to
the Wednesday in the Word
podcast.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and this is
my podcast about what the Bible
means and how we know.
Today is the sixth talk in our
series on the Gospel of John.
We'll be looking at John
chapter 2, verses 13 through 25.
I'm so glad you joined us.
We're continuing in our big
picture series on the Gospel of
John today.
I have been arguing that the
fundamental assertion of the
book of John is that eternal
life comes to those who believe
the testimony that Jesus is the
Christ.
But belief is not simple and
straightforward.
John is exploring the
complicated set of issues which
surround belief.
As we've talked about, John's
gospel focuses on three related
themes.
First, the importance of
testimony.
We believe because of the
testimony of those who were
eyewitnesses to the life of
Jesus.
Second, believing in Jesus is
the only way to receive eternal
life.
The point of all that testimony
is that we believe in Jesus,
and it's important we believe
because Jesus is the only one
who can grant us eternal life.
And the third theme we've seen
is the necessity of being born
again or baptized with the
Spirit.
John contrasts those who
believe with those who don't
believe, and the difference
between them is the activity of
the Spirit of God.
Today we're going to look at
the third of three stories that
involve the first disciples of
Jesus.
These are the men who will
eventually become the twelve
apostles.
Two weeks ago we looked at the
first of the three stories where
Jesus calls his disciples.
We saw Andrew, Peter, Philip,
and Nathaniel, and John himself
believe because of the testimony
of John the Baptist.
Then their belief is
strengthened through Jesus'
miraculous knowledge of
Nathaniel.
Then in the second story, these
disciples see Jesus turn the
water into wine at the wedding
in Cana.
Whatever else is going on with
that miracle, John is most
interested in the fact that the
disciples believed in Jesus as a
result.
They are now further convinced
that they are following the
right man and Jesus of Nazareth
is the Messiah.
The original disciples who
became the twelve apostles serve
as eyes and ears for you and me
and for all believers
throughout church history.
John wants us to know how they
became so convinced that Jesus
is the Christ.
In his gospel, John focuses on
the relationship between
testimony and belief, and the
apostles play a very important
part in that relationship.
They see firsthand the evidence
that Jesus is the Christ.
They are role models of people
who respond to that evidence,
that testimony with belief.
And it is their testimony,
ultimately, that you and I must
believe.
We didn't see the life of Jesus
firsthand, we rely on their
testimony, and these three
stories tell us how the
disciples came to believe and
why they're so convinced.
Let's look at the third story.
We'll start with John chapter
two verses twelve through
sixteen.
After this he went down to
Capernaum with his mother and
his brothers and his disciples,
and stayed there for a few days.
The Passover of the Jews was at
hand, and Jesus went up to
Jerusalem.
In the temple he found those
who were selling oxen and sheep
and pigeons and the money
changers sitting there, and
making a whip of cords, he drove
them all out of the temple with
the sheep and the oxen, and he
poured out the coins of the
money changers and overturned
their tables, and he told those
who sold the pigeons, take these
things away, do not make my
father's house a house of trade.
This little story has been the
subject of much debate in church
history.
In John's telling, following
the miracle at the wedding,
Jesus goes to Capernaum, and a
few days later he travels to
Jerusalem for the Passover,
where he cleanses the temple.
So John tells us this cleansing
of the temple occurred early in
the ministry of Jesus.
But the other three Gospels
describe the cleansing of the
temple as an event which
happened in the last week of
Jesus' earthly life.
So what's going on there?
Well, if we were doing a
detailed study, we'd get into
the various theories that have
been proposed and we'd sort out
the evidence between them and
make a decision.
For the purposes of this big
picture study, I'm just going to
tell you what I've concluded.
Without getting into a lot of
the details and the arguments, I
think the best way, the
simplest way actually, to
understand the situation is that
Jesus cleansed the temple
twice, once in his early
ministry, and again in the last
week of his earthly life.
Now, if you listen to my
introduction, you're familiar
with how John organizes the
story of Jesus differently than
the other three Gospels.
Matthew, Mark, and Luke tell
the story in two parts.
The first part they focus on
the ministry of Jesus in
Galilee, and they all tell the
story of Peter confessing that
Jesus is the Christ, and after
that confession, they begin part
two, which is Jesus' journey to
Jerusalem, culminating with his
death, resurrection, and
ascension.
John uses a different
structure.
He includes many small side
trips that Jesus made to
Jerusalem before the final
triumphal entry.
For their purposes, Matthew,
Mark, and Luke did not include
these side trips, and since they
didn't include these side
trips, they also would not
include the events which
happened on those side trips,
like this first cleansing of the
temple.
Given the different goals and
purposes of the authors, I think
it makes perfect sense that the
other three Gospels omit this
incident.
However, some people are upset
by this idea of duplication,
they're bothered by the idea
that Jesus did something twice
and they reject that explanation
because of it.
I would argue back, repetition
is the mark of a teacher.
I find myself teaching the same
ideas over and over again
because the same themes come up
repeatedly in many different
books of the Bible.
Pick your favorite teacher.
If you wander through the bulk
of their teaching, I'll bet you
discover they often give the
same message more than once.
I don't think it's stretching
things at all to claim that
Jesus cleansed the temple twice
during his earthly ministry.
In fact, given human nature,
it's difficult for me to imagine
that the first cleansing solved
the problem.
I suspect after Jesus left
town, it wasn't very long before
all the tables were upright
once more and the money changers
were back in business.
It doesn't surprise me that
when he came back later the
money changers were back in
their usual spots.
So let's move on to the heart
of the story.
What provokes Jesus to cleanse
the temple?
Many Jews didn't live in
Jerusalem or in Judea.
They lived around the
Mediterranean in various places.
Some people lived quite a
distance from Jerusalem.
At least once in their
lifetime, Jews were expected to
travel to Jerusalem during one
of the feasts or festivals and
make sacrifices at the temple in
Jerusalem.
To make the various offerings,
you needed various livestock.
Well you could imagine
traveling with a live animal in
those days was difficult and
slow, especially on a long
walking trip.
Instead, pilgrims converted
their livestock to wealth, like
coins, pearls, or other
valuables, things they could
travel with easily.
When they arrived in Jerusalem,
they used those valuables to
buy whatever animal they wanted
for whatever sacrifice they
wanted to make.
Now once in Jerusalem they
might encounter another problem,
the region they lived in might
use a different kind of coinage
than what Jerusalem used.
For example, Galilee was under
a different Roman ruler than
Judea and Galilee used different
coins.
Also, the temple authorities
were very particular about what
kind of coins were acceptable
and what coins were not.
The temple authorities only
wanted currency of the purest
silver.
You can see how money changers
would thrive in that kind of
situation.
The money changers would take
whatever impure coins the
pilgrims had and exchange them
for the silver coins required by
the temple authorities and also
sell them the required
livestock, keeping a commission
for themselves, of course.
So far so good, but over time
the money changing system became
a thriving marketplace.
I think the critical words here
are in verse 214 where he says
in the temple, the oxen, the
sheep, the doves, and so forth,
they were being bought and sold
on the temple grounds.
I suspect that if the money
changers had set up shop on a
nearby hill, maybe across the
Kidron Valley or someplace,
Jesus would have left them
alone.
Instead, they converted the
outer court of the temple, the
Gentile court, into a
marketplace and a currency
exchange.
Imagine trying to worship and
offer your sacrifices when
you're surrounded by the sound
of bleeding animals, stomping
hooves, and voices calling and
haggling in an open marketplace.
Jesus is outraged by the way
God's house has been
trivialized, so he fashions a
whip to drive out the animals
and he turns over the tables and
scatters the coins of the money
changers.
Why is this event important to
John?
Well John tells us in 217.
His disciples remembered that
it was written, zeal for your
house will consume me.
Now for a long time I
misunderstood this verse.
The typical translation is Zeal
for your house will consume me.
And in my early study, I didn't
go back and look at where it's
written in the Old Testament, so
I understood that in the sense
we use the word consume today.
So I thought Jesus was consumed
with jealousy, like I might
say, I'm consumed with curiosity
or I'm consumed with fear.
I assume this verse meant that
zeal for God's house had totally
and passionately filled his
mind.
But when you look at the
context of Psalm sixty nine,
that's not what that verse is
saying.
In Psalm sixty nine, David is
lamenting the results that have
befallen him because he follows
God.
Let me read Psalm sixty nine
six through nine.
Let not those who hope in you
be put to shame through me, O
Lord God of hosts, let not those
who seek you be brought to
dishonor through me, O God of
Israel.
For it is for your sake that I
have borne reproach, that
dishonor has covered my face.
I have become a stranger to my
brothers, an alien to my
mother's sons.
For zeal for your house has
consumed me, and the reproaches
of those who reproach you have
fallen on me.
Verse nine of Psalm sixty nine
is the verse the disciples
remembered.
This Psalm is written in Hebrew
poetry.
The main feature of Hebrew
poetry is parallelism.
Each idea is written in a
paired parallel line, and the
two lines work together to
complete the meaning.
Oftentimes the two lines mean
the same thing.
For example, the first line
might be my mother's son hates
me, and the second line might be
my brother despises me.
Those two lines mean basically
the same thing and you have to
put them together to get the
full idea.
Look at the two lines in Psalm
sixty nine nine.
For zeal for your house has
consumed me, and the reproaches
of those who reproach you have
fallen on me.
Those two statements, zeal for
your house has consumed or
devoured me, and the reproach of
those who reproach you has
fallen on me, are in parallel.
They're meant to be taken
together, they're meant to
complete one meaning.
In the second line, there's
this ironic twist.
The enemies of God want to
reproach God, but they can't get
at him, so their reproaches
fall on David instead.
David follows God, these people
hate God, so they hate David,
and they take it out on David
because David follows God.
So they're shooting at God, but
David's the one getting hit.
The zeal line, I think, is
meant to restate that same idea.
If we translate the word
consume as devour, I think the
parallelism becomes more clear.
Zeal for your house has
devoured me.
My zeal for your house has the
same negative consequences.
Those who hate your house hate
me, and this Hebrew word often
has this sense of consumed,
devoured, or destroyed.
Zeal for God's house ended up
having the same kind of negative
consequences for Jesus.
The religious authorities want
to kill him, and eventually they
will succeed.
John's comment is that's what
the disciples remember.
The story's over now.
Jesus has been executed and
resurrected.
Now the disciples have seen how
the story played out, they
think back to this event early
in his ministry, and they put it
in context of now everything
they've learned about Jesus and
what he came to do.
As they recall this event in
the ministry of Jesus, they
remember this lament that David
made.
David had zeal for God's house.
That zeal led to devastation
for David at the hands of his
enemies.
And they look back and say, the
same thing happened to Jesus.
And you can see why they might
be thinking about this as they
look back on the life of Jesus.
Here Jesus is at God's house in
the temple.
He's throwing down the tables,
he's driving out the animals,
he's creating all the chaos, and
that provokes the religious
authorities.
At the time, the disciples were
probably thinking, uh-oh, the
priests and leaders are not
going to like this, they're
going to be really mad, they're
going to be outraged that Jesus
is doing this, and we're going
to get in a lot of trouble.
And in fact, they do.
This kind of provoking the
leadership in Jerusalem is what
ultimately led to Jesus'
crucifixion.
This is one of those events
that turned the Jewish
leadership against Jesus.
And we can see that because
John dwells on their reaction.
John is interested in how the
disciples reacted to this event
and how the Jewish leadership
reacted.
Let me read the rest of the
story and you can see how that
plays out.
I'm going to start in 217.
His disciples remembered that
it was written, Zeal for your
house will consume me.
So the Jews said to him, What
sign do you show us for doing
these things?
Jesus answered them, Destroy
this temple, and in three days I
will raise it up.
The Jews then said, It's taken
forty-six years to build this
temple, and will you raise it up
in three days?
But he was speaking about the
temple of his body.
When therefore he was raised
from the dead, his disciples
remembered that he had spoken
this, and they believed the
scripture and the word Jesus had
spoken.
Jesus makes this scene.
It provokes the leaders.
The leaders come to him and
say, Who do you think you are?
What gives you the right to
overturn the tables and drive
out the animals?
We want to see a sign from God
that gives you the authority to
take this action, because only
God Himself could give you the
right to come into the temple
and upset everything.
And Jesus says, You want a
sign?
I'll give you a sign.
Destroy this temple and in
three days I will raise it up.
The Jewish leadership is angry,
they're dismissive of him.
I suspect he knew they wouldn't
believe any sign he gave them.
So he gives them a kind of
riddle, a kind of metaphor, and
he says, Destroy this temple and
I'll raise it in three days, by
which he meant, kill me and in
three days God will raise me
again.
You want a sign that I have the
right to do this?
You're going to kill me, but
God will raise me up as proof
that I am the Messiah.
Now remember, John has set the
stage by saying the disciples
remembered this verse, zeal for
your house will destroy me.
This angry response is exactly
what the disciples were afraid
of at the time.
They were worried that Jesus is
provoking the powers that be,
and that is going to turn out
badly for him.
Jesus says, You want a sign,
kill me, and in three days I
will rise again.
Well, killing him is exactly
what the disciples are afraid
of.
Now, naturally, because they're
standing in the temple, the
Jewish leaders are going to
think literally, not
metaphorically, and they say,
Well, that's a safe sign to say
you'll give.
If you destroy this temple,
you'll raise it up in three
days, because of course we're
not going to destroy the temple,
just to see if you can rebuild
it.
Besides, it took 46 years to
build this temple.
Rebuilding it in three days is
impossible.
They misunderstand Jesus
doesn't explain.
He's not ready to reveal that
part of the plan yet.
But in the end, we know that's
exactly what happened.
The Jewish leaders and the
Romans destroyed the temple of
Jesus' body, and three days
later God raised him up.
And what he said to them in
this context is exactly what
ended up happening.
It's only in retrospect that
the disciples looked back and
they put all the pieces
together.
I don't think Jesus expected
anybody to understand what he
was saying at the moment he said
it, but he knew this would be a
lesson that his disciples would
learn eventually, they just
weren't ready to understand it
yet.
But later the disciples would
look back and understand.
This event would be another
piece of evidence that confirmed
their belief.
It's also interesting that
Jesus displays so much courage
in this situation.
He's taken this provocative and
disruptive action.
The powers that be are angry
and upset, they can bring down
the force of Rome on him.
But he doesn't back down.
He doesn't say, wait, I can
explain, don't take it wrong.
Instead, he says something
nobody there will understand at
the moment he says it.
Even his disciples had no idea
what he was talking about.
Yet he's so completely
confident in the plan of God
that he can speak with utter
courage and conviction.
He knows the authorities aren't
going to harm him yet, that's
not part of God's plan.
He can act boldly, he can speak
in riddles, he doesn't have to
explain himself.
He knows God's plan will be
done, and he can trust God no
matter how angry the leaders
get.
Similarly, he knows the
disciples won't really get it
right now.
They won't understand the
significance of this event.
He knows they'll be confused on
the day it happened, but one
day they will get it.
God has them in his plans too,
and when the time is right, they
will look back, they will
understand, and they will
believe.
And that's exactly what
happened.
After the resurrection, his
disciples remembered he had said
this thing about being raised
after three days, and they put
all the pieces together.
He said, Destroy this temple,
and in three days I'll raise it
up, and after three days he rose
from the dead, and now the
disciples realize Jesus was
talking about himself.
He knew early on that he was
the Messiah.
And what's the significance of
all of this as John tells the
story?
Look at 222.
When therefore he was raised
from the dead, his disciples
remembered that he had said
this, and they believed of the
scripture and the word that
Jesus had spoken.
The disciples believed the
scripture, they believed the
words of Jesus.
They had this experience with
Jesus, and that experience
reinforced their confidence that
Jesus is the Messiah.
This event is one more piece of
evidence for them, and they
believe.
Why are they so confident that
Jesus of Nazareth, who died on
the cross and was resurrected is
the Messiah?
Well, here's another reason.
Jesus knew he had the authority
of the Messiah, and he could
throw out the money changers.
As Messiah, it was his right to
clear the temple.
Further, he knew from the
beginning that as Messiah he was
going to die, and God would
resurrect him.
And the disciples saw that.
They have evidence that Jesus
knew who he was, knew what was
going to happen to him, knew the
plan of God in advance, and
once they'd seen the whole plan,
they remembered and understood,
and it reinforced their belief.
Now John gives us a note of
caution.
Up until now we've seen this
pattern of testimony and belief,
miraculous sign and belief.
But belief is not always simple
and straightforward.
Sometimes belief is not
genuine, it's not what it
appears to be.
Let's look at verses twenty
three through twenty five.
Now when he was in Jerusalem at
the Passover feast, many
believed in his name when they
saw the signs that he was doing.
But Jesus on his part did not
entrust himself to them, because
he knew all people and needed
no one to bear witness about
man, for he himself knew what
was in man.
With the next story, John
changes tone.
Author John is going to start
exploring the nature of belief.
These three little verses set
the stage for that change.
While Jesus was in Jerusalem
for the Passover feast, he did
many other signs, people saw him
perform those signs, and many
people believed.
Well, at this point, it would
be easy for Jesus to get all
excited.
Look, all these people are
believing in me.
This is great.
The crowds are interested.
I'm popular.
Momentum is building.
Look at this great big initial
response.
But Jesus did not entrust
himself to them.
He did not assume that they
were really on his side.
He did not assume they had
genuine saving faith.
Because he knows what people
are like.
People are fickle.
People can get excited by
seeing a miracle and then turn
and walk away.
People can be drawn by the
miracles, but ultimately refuse
to believe.
Just look at the story of the
Exodus.
God did miracle after miracle
for that generation, and
ultimately the people grumbled,
got to the edge of the Promised
Land, and said, Let's kill Moses
and go back to Egypt.
Later in John, we'll read about
how many disciples quit and
stopped following him because
they didn't like something he
said.
Another example, eleven of the
original twelve disciples
developed into men of mature and
stable faith, but one of those
twelve betrayed Jesus and ended
up committing suicide.
Jesus knows that sincere,
committed, genuine saving faith
takes more than just being
impressed by a miracle.
And John is going to start
exploring that theme in the next
story.
Is initial excitement and
interest enough to qualify as
belief?
No.
Belief requires something more,
and we'll see that explored
next.
But first, let's review the
themes we've seen in the last
three stories.
The original disciples serve as
eyes and ears for all believers
throughout church history.
John is explaining to us how
they became so convinced that
Jesus is the Christ.
In fact, they become so
convinced that Jesus is the
Christ that all except John
would eventually suffer and be
martyred because of their faith.
John wants us to have
confidence in their testimony,
so he traces the progress of
their belief.
John is explaining how the
disciples came to know that
Jesus is the Christ.
First, they're drawn to Jesus
by the testimony of John the
Baptist.
Prophet John said, God told me
how to recognize the Messiah,
and the Messiah is Jesus.
The sign happened when I
baptized Jesus.
Then they saw Jesus' miraculous
knowledge of Nathaniel, and
Author John tells us they
believed.
A few days later, the disciples
see Jesus turn water into wine
at a wedding.
God testifies that Jesus is the
Messiah through this
supernatural event, and again
they believe.
Then they see Jesus cast the
money changers out of the
temple.
When the leaders confront
Jesus, demanding to know what
gives him the right to do this,
Jesus said he would perform a
sign.
If the Jewish leaders destroyed
the temple, he would raise it
up in three days.
After the resurrection, the
disciples remember this event,
they remember what Jesus said,
they realize he was talking
about a great sign, he was
talking about the temple of his
body, and they realize he knew
early on that as Messiah He was
going to be executed and
resurrected.
They now understand what he was
getting at back then.
And what's the result?
They have all the more
confidence, they have all the
more belief that Jesus is who he
said he is.
So the disciples had testimony
from the prophet John the
Baptist, they have seen several
miracles firsthand, and they
have the words of Jesus
demonstrating his understanding
of who he was and what he came
to do.
During the wedding, he implied
that his hour had not yet come,
that hour when he's glorified as
Messiah.
It was not yet then, but it
will come.
He audaciously takes it upon
himself to defend the purity of
his father's house by vigorously
disrupting the merchants in the
temple, and there he hints that
he would be executed and
resurrected.
This is the picture we've seen
so far of this man whom the
disciples are coming to believe
is the Messiah, and this is
their testimony to us.
John is telling us these things
because each of us has to
decide for ourselves whether or
not we will believe their
testimony.
You've been listening to the
Wednesday in the Word podcast.
My mission is to explain not
only what a passage means, but
how we figure it out.
The blog version of this
episode is on the link below
this podcast, or go to
wednesdayintheword.com slash
John 6.
If you've been blessed by this
podcast, please support the show
by subscribing and leaving a
positive rating on your favorite
podcast platform.
But most importantly, tell a
friend what you learned and
where you learned it.
Our theme music is graciously
provided by my friend and
favorite musician Reggie Coates.
You can find all of his music
at heartfeltmusic.org.
If you want to find out more
about Bible study or hear all
the episodes in this series,
please go to
wednesdayintheword.com.
Thank you so much for listening
today.
I'm Krisan Marotta, and I'll
see you next week at Wednesday
in the Word.